|
Title: 696 exhaust Post by: MOUSEMAN on September 18, 2008, 10:09:19 AM Hows this look?
(http://xs131.xs.to/xs131/08384/0918081302192.jpeg) (http://xs.to) Title: Re: 696 exhaust Post by: Grampa on September 18, 2008, 10:15:56 AM [thumbsup]
how do she sound? Title: Re: 696 exhaust Post by: nkryptit on September 18, 2008, 10:22:56 AM Is that a custom 2 into 1 setup...I'm guessing there isn't another one on the other side?
Title: Re: 696 exhaust Post by: zedsaid on September 18, 2008, 10:26:17 AM All that work, and you still have stickers on your frame. [bang]
Other than that, it's pretty tight, not up my alley, but tight. (i have no interest in mods that eliminate my capacity to carry a supermodel on my back.) Title: Re: 696 exhaust Post by: Raux on September 18, 2008, 10:49:43 AM Hows this look? (http://xs131.xs.to/xs131/08384/0918081302192.jpeg) (http://xs.to) more pics... show from the back and other side. also how did you route the exhausts and who made that? what rearsets and is there capability to put on pillion pegs? couldn't you have kept the stock rearset and hung the pipe on that? Title: Re: 696 exhaust Post by: MOUSEMAN on September 18, 2008, 10:57:50 AM I don't know much about it. My buddy made it and sent me the pic. More info when I find out.
Title: Re: 696 exhaust Post by: Jarvicious on September 18, 2008, 12:21:10 PM Is that a scorpion can? One of the girls who rides the weekly ride here has one on her (I think) R6. Even on a 4 banger the thing sounds mean as shit. I do prefer underbody or undertail exhaust, but the low pipe looks good.
Title: Re: 696 exhaust Post by: rosstermyer on September 18, 2008, 01:19:25 PM it doesnt look bad, but the routing of the piping from the rear cylinder looks kinda meh. i also dont really care for the 1.5 foot brace bar for the muffler...there has to be a better way to do that.
Title: Re: 696 exhaust Post by: desmopr on September 18, 2008, 01:54:21 PM ^^I agree, but you have to admit it look tons better than fugly stock one. [thumbsup] from me.
Title: Re: 696 exhaust Post by: dbran1949 on September 18, 2008, 02:12:30 PM it doesnt look bad, but the routing of the piping from the rear cylinder looks kinda meh. i also dont really care for the 1.5 foot brace bar for the muffler...there has to be a better way to do that. It's important to keep the pipe lengths equal, don't know how else it could have been done Title: Re: 696 exhaust Post by: Jarvicious on September 18, 2008, 05:06:41 PM Wow, didn't notice the pipe brace the first time. That does look a bit ridiculous. Maybe some sort of angle frame setup that connects to the back part of the rearset? It would clean things up real nice like.
Title: Re: 696 exhaust Post by: MOUSEMAN on September 20, 2008, 07:09:45 PM Ok, more info, It was done kinda quick for Moto GP so the brace was kind of a necessary evil. The rear sets were already chopped so there was no other way to support the can. If the stock rear sets with passenger pegs were there it would be attached to them. It is a two into one with equal length pipes, that is why the routing looks like it does. Supposedly on the dyno it make 7 hp over the Termi system. It does sound great, but I only heard it idle. Anyway it cleans up the line of the bike a lot.
Title: Re: 696 exhaust Post by: 707soldier on September 20, 2008, 07:54:54 PM I like it, Low boy style [thumbsup]
Title: Re: 696 exhaust Post by: Raux on September 20, 2008, 07:59:54 PM Ok, more info, It was done kinda quick for Moto GP so the brace was kind of a necessary evil. The rear sets were already chopped so there was no other way to support the can. If the stock rear sets with passenger pegs were there it would be attached to them. It is a two into one with equal length pipes, that is why the routing looks like it does. Supposedly on the dyno it make 7 hp over the Termi system. It does sound great, but I only heard it idle. Anyway it cleans up the line of the bike a lot. CHOPPED rear sets? guess there's no going back huh? Title: Re: 696 exhaust Post by: Milk Run on September 20, 2008, 08:48:26 PM I like it. I would likely part with money to get it.
I'm not disappointed with the look of the stock system but I love the look of the stubby exhaust. It reminds of this Brutale. (http://www.emotouk.com/mvagusta/exhausts/brutale/arrow/2.jpg) Title: Re: 696 exhaust Post by: gearhead on September 21, 2008, 07:07:47 AM Is the ecu changed on it?
Title: Re: 696 exhaust Post by: MOUSEMAN on September 23, 2008, 03:44:40 AM Is the ecu changed on it? I believe it is stock.Title: Re: 696 exhaust Post by: zLoki on September 23, 2008, 08:51:28 PM Check it out...
http://www.blog.desmoworks.com/ducati/monster-696-custom-exhaust-system/ (http://www.blog.desmoworks.com/ducati/monster-696-custom-exhaust-system/) [evil] [moto] Title: Re: 696 exhaust Post by: Dareduc on September 23, 2008, 11:01:50 PM looks... nice
does it do anything for performance? Title: Re: 696 exhaust Post by: semyhr on September 23, 2008, 11:28:50 PM If the cat is gone, then probably it does :) no cat = usually more power.
Title: Re: 696 exhaust Post by: MOUSEMAN on September 24, 2008, 03:16:17 AM looks... nice Supposedly on the dyno it make 7 hp over the Termi system. does it do anything for performance? Title: Re: 696 exhaust Post by: TAftonomos on September 24, 2008, 07:25:43 PM Hrrrmmm....I like that can. I'm about ready to start the exhaust on my s4rt (after I finish a customers twin meg exhaust), and I'm still looking for a can.
Whatcha think....if it can flow enough for a 180hp gsxr (what it's made for), should be able to work on a 140hp twin (my s4rt)... |