Ducati Monster Forum

Local Clubs => OZ monsters => Topic started by: Dockstrada on November 19, 2008, 12:59:38 PM



Title: 696 not so ugly
Post by: Dockstrada on November 19, 2008, 12:59:38 PM
Wow look at my asss she looks nice and tidy

(http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3207/3044439992_e521eea590_o.jpg)


Title: Re: 696 not so ugly
Post by: Super T.I.B on November 19, 2008, 01:19:00 PM
Wow look at my asss she looks nice and tidy

(http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3207/3044439992_e521eea590_o.jpg)

Much cleaner with the Quat-D exbox.  [thumbsup]


Title: Re: 696 not so ugly
Post by: brimo on November 19, 2008, 02:31:38 PM
Termis and a tail chop make em look a bit less weighty round the a$$ too.

http://ducatimonsterforum.org/index.php?topic=15100.0 (http://ducatimonsterforum.org/index.php?topic=15100.0)


Title: Re: 696 not so ugly
Post by: craigo on November 19, 2008, 02:48:12 PM
Just add motowheels rearsets to remove the fugly passenger pegs and Voila!

(http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e344/Motowheelscom/Motowheels%20696/rearsetright2.jpg)


Title: Re: 696 not so ugly
Post by: mattyvas on November 19, 2008, 10:40:47 PM
I'm thinking an M1100 with that gear on it will look pretty neat.
Can you see the SSS with an EBox and those rearsets.


Title: Re: 696 not so ugly
Post by: craigo on November 19, 2008, 11:45:49 PM
I'm thinking an M1100S with that gear on it will look pretty neat.

there, fixed it for you.  ;D

You can't even consider the M1100 without the Ohlins. :)


Title: Re: 696 not so ugly
Post by: mattyvas on November 20, 2008, 01:09:20 AM
yeah but after speaking to another bloke on Saturday who has a 1098s and just spent $3k on suspension.
So don't know if I'd be that convinced that Ohlins is always worth it.


Title: Re: 696 not so ugly
Post by: Spider on November 27, 2008, 01:39:14 AM
yeah but after speaking to another bloke on Saturday who has a 1098s and just spent $3k on suspension.
So don't know if I'd be that convinced that Ohlins is always worth it.

don't tease Matty, what was the go of the conversation: he's ripped the Ohlins off? put cartridges in? front, back? both?

spill em kiddo!


Title: Re: 696 not so ugly
Post by: mattyvas on November 27, 2008, 01:46:52 AM
No he didn't rip the gear off, he just spent $3k on having it re-tuned for him.
And being 100kg's plus, I think there was a fair bit of work done.
But then if you saw the bike itself, a beautiful black 1098s with bling on it to rival your good self and the import company.

Must get a snap of it one of these days.


Title: Re: 696 not so ugly
Post by: Dockstrada on November 27, 2008, 01:53:12 AM
Here you go Matty

(http://www.nswroadandtrackbikes.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=3010&d=1227681278)

(http://www.nswroadandtrackbikes.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=3005&d=1227681140)


Title: Re: 696 not so ugly
Post by: Dannog on November 27, 2008, 02:21:46 AM
It certainly looks better with the Quad Box but I just can't get past the heavy tube frame and plastic tank. Alas the 1100 at the show didn't inspire me also. :'(


Title: Re: 696 not so ugly
Post by: mattyvas on November 27, 2008, 02:39:18 AM
was that going to be a snap of the 1098s in question.


Title: Re: 696 not so ugly
Post by: bmroxm5 on November 28, 2008, 03:22:33 AM
Wow look at my asss she looks nice and tidy

(http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3207/3044439992_e521eea590_o.jpg)

umm noobish question.. but this bike doesn't look like it has an exhaust?


Title: Re: 696 not so ugly
Post by: mattyvas on November 28, 2008, 03:34:46 AM
She's down below under the rearset, it's called an Ex-Box from Quad-D


Title: Re: 696 not so ugly
Post by: mattyvas on November 28, 2008, 04:12:20 AM
Just been messing about with colours on the M1100s.
I'd like to see with these combo's.

Silver with black frame.

(http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3252/3064913943_5248903402.jpg?v=0)

and Red with black frame.

(http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3154/3065752646_4535ab24ea.jpg?v=0)

I think with these combo's the lack of a full trellis frame is blended out.


Title: Re: 696 not so ugly
Post by: Spider on November 28, 2008, 10:56:26 PM
now change the cans for carbon Termi's and your getting there!


Title: Re: 696 not so ugly
Post by: mattyvas on November 28, 2008, 11:09:15 PM
Termi's are not for me.
I'd get either MIVV again or Quad-D or Zards.
You get where I'm going though don't you.

What's your news on a new machine?


Title: Re: 696 not so ugly
Post by: Spider on November 28, 2008, 11:37:44 PM
ah, just started today - went out and bought new gloves (Dainese Hellracers - frickin says something when you buy the product again - just so comfortable - tested 'the dual' but the side/blade "distortion control' (wank) panel is uncomfortable.

replacement helmet - Shoei X-11 unless anyone can suggest better....is next....then I'll start test riding....

848 and Dos Verde's S4R (I haven't told Brendan this yet though  ;D )

reckon I should try the 1100s? what's retail anyway? $18 odd? (no fairing - that will be SHITE for the highway and touring duties!)

not sure over what the next step should be, will sit done with Dos and discuss, cause with only 9 months and 8,000km under my belt I don't want to go overboard....be happy with another 992ds engine actually!


Title: Re: 696 not so ugly
Post by: bazz20 on November 29, 2008, 12:01:10 AM
hurry up ya big skirt i dont wont you on the back in feb unless your happy being my pregnant dog [cheeky] [laugh]


Title: Re: 696 not so ugly
Post by: Spider on November 29, 2008, 06:26:26 PM
that's alright - just drop yours off - I'll get the wheels painted/plated dark grey and be away!


Title: Re: 696 not so ugly
Post by: Dockstrada on November 29, 2008, 11:38:55 PM
looks great Matty,Id go for the sliver with the classic option [thumbsup]


SimplePortal 2.1.1