|
Title: New for Coogee Bay hotel (Not Safe For Work) Post by: Dockstrada on November 21, 2008, 12:04:01 AM The Coogee Bay Hotel has added a new ice cream for all to enjoy [puke]
(http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3062/3047782822_99f13ae7f9.jpg?v=1227328662) Title: Re: New for Coogee Bay hotel Post by: mattyvas on November 21, 2008, 12:56:06 AM Do you need to eat it with the little white strip over your eyes?
Title: Re: New for Coogee Bay hotel Post by: craigo on November 21, 2008, 03:59:47 AM <gentleranting>
Can you put [NSFW] for "Not Safe For Work" in the title if a post is gonna contain errmm, interesting photos my boss might not agree Dock? :) As much as I love CockIceCream and ChickenInAss post, my HR dept might think otherwise.. so if you [NSFW] it would be ace. </gentleranting> Title: Re: New for Coogee Bay hotel Post by: Betty on November 21, 2008, 04:05:21 AM That is just wrong on so many levels (http://smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/23/im/hhis.gif)
Title: Re: New for Coogee Bay hotel Post by: Jukie on November 21, 2008, 11:52:41 AM i would like one or two or maybe even three :P
Title: Re: New for Coogee Bay hotel Post by: tricolore on November 21, 2008, 04:20:53 PM slightly humerous if it were a grown woman in the pic, a child, not cool...
Title: Re: New for Coogee Bay hotel Post by: Jukie on November 21, 2008, 04:40:49 PM no not cool at all
Title: Re: New for Coogee Bay hotel Post by: Dockstrada on November 21, 2008, 08:33:44 PM True not so cool for those concentrating on the person eating the ice cream, it wasn’t posted in that context.
But for those concentrating on the ice scream based on the resent events its quite amusing. We all interpret things in a different ways, some are more twisted than others. make of it what you like. In any case i will make an adjustment for ethics . Title: Re: New for Coogee Bay hotel Post by: brimo on November 22, 2008, 10:07:12 PM We all interpret things in a different ways, some are more twisted than others. make of it what you like.... So what's wrong with an ice cream in the shape of an Axolotl ? |