Title: Turbo S2R Post by: TwIsTeD on August 05, 2009, 04:10:03 PM http://www.duccutters.com/WaynePatterson-S2Rturbo.tpl (http://www.duccutters.com/WaynePatterson-S2Rturbo.tpl)
I searched "turbo s2r" and nothin came up.I swear. Title: Re: Turbo S2R Post by: LA on August 05, 2009, 04:39:02 PM Why would anybody go to all that trouble to get 100 hp when any decent used 03 - 06 S4R will put out well over 100 hp at the rear wheel with no mods at all?
LA Title: Re: Turbo S2R Post by: al@sktc on August 05, 2009, 04:49:10 PM Why would anybody go to all that trouble to get 100 hp when any decent used 03 - 06 S4R will put out well over 100 hp at the rear wheel with no mods at all? LA why not? Title: Re: Turbo S2R Post by: NAKID on August 05, 2009, 04:58:04 PM I'm on the same page as LA. All that trouble (and money) for less than 100 at the wheel?
And again, all that effort to plumb the turbo and they throw some plain jane muffler on the pipe blocking the view of the open wheel? Sorry, I don't get it... Title: Re: Turbo S2R Post by: TwIsTeD on August 05, 2009, 05:13:51 PM I was thinking the same about the labor/result ratio.
Nothing like having some extra time and cash'ola layin around. [popcorn] for now. Title: Re: Turbo S2R Post by: al@sktc on August 05, 2009, 05:35:45 PM it goes back to why we have motorcycles........to be different. i think i am going to do something stupid to my bike!
Title: Re: Turbo S2R Post by: Popeye the Sailor on August 05, 2009, 05:55:52 PM Hey if he wants to mod the bike, more power to him-it's damn cool.
If we're going to claim mods should add bang for the buck, or bikes in general should, then it doesn't make a lot of sense to be on a duc. Title: Re: Turbo S2R Post by: Ducatiloo on August 05, 2009, 06:04:28 PM I tip my hat to that work of art. [bow_down] It is on DucCutters.com, a stock S4Rs would not fly on that site.
Title: Re: Turbo S2R Post by: kopfjÀger on August 05, 2009, 06:22:49 PM Why would anybody go to all that trouble to get 100 hp LA Because you can. ;) Title: Re: Turbo S2R Post by: pennyrobber on August 05, 2009, 06:42:31 PM 100 hp out of an 800 is pretty damn good.
I feel that mods requiring tons of work are often the best stuff out there. Think about the dealer monster challenge that took place when the new 1100 came out. All anyone did was bolt on parts that were readily available. I would have been way more impressed with seriously custom stuff such as a one off turbo system. Title: Re: Turbo S2R Post by: TAftonomos on August 05, 2009, 06:56:13 PM Because you can exactly :) No real point in most of this madness...
Besides...some would say running an open set of pipes that sound like a flatuating rhino that has eaten a field of fruit and had 20 pots of coffee is retarded... ;D [laugh] [cheeky] Title: Re: Turbo S2R Post by: Latinbalar on August 06, 2009, 02:35:06 AM does anybody notice that in the video the out put for the turbo is not connected to anything while he is on the dyno. But on the pictures hits connected?
Title: Re: Turbo S2R Post by: Duck-Stew on August 06, 2009, 06:35:38 AM Mod your own ride. [moto] [thumbsup]
And a BIG [bow_down] to another Wayne Patterson creation. Dude's awesome.... [beer] Title: Re: Turbo S2R Post by: NorDog on August 06, 2009, 09:30:03 AM Why would anybody go to all that trouble to get 100 hp when any decent used 03 - 06 S4R will put out well over 100 hp at the rear wheel with no mods at all? LA Because it's fun? Because it's fun to push a design to see what YOU can do with it? Because. Title: Re: Turbo S2R Post by: duccarlos on August 06, 2009, 10:21:25 AM And a BIG [bow_down] to another Wayne Patterson creation. Dude's awesome.... [beer] My awesome scale is based on Shawn Connery in Highlander. Is he really that awesome? I think not. Title: Re: Turbo S2R Post by: Triple J on August 06, 2009, 11:01:02 AM Turbo Multistrada 1000. Apparently has 140 rwhp! :o [evil]
http://www.multistrada.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=17811&highlight=turbo (http://www.multistrada.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=17811&highlight=turbo) Title: Re: Turbo S2R Post by: TurboMonster on August 06, 2009, 11:03:25 AM The "turbo s2r" is a girls bike....
Seriously, Wayne and Todd built it for Wayne wife, Glenda. She wanted a turbo bike of here own to ride at there track events. Those dyno sheets are from the 1st version of the bike,when the turbo was on the lower left side and still have leaks in the air-box. Todd said he'd run some new ones when he gets a chance. The bike is set to only run 3psi of boost, it is Glenda's street bike... Did anyone notice the lower engine fairing incases a custom water tank? The bike uses a custom made water injector as an anti-knock/cooling system. Wayne's SuperSport (904cc) makes over 215Hp and there new 999 project should be over 300Hp. So I'm pretty sure they a lot more out of that 800, if they want to. I think they built turbo Ducati, for the simple reason "they can". :-) Title: Re: Turbo S2R Post by: CairnsDuc on August 06, 2009, 02:00:28 PM Turbo Multistrada 1000. Apparently has 140 rwhp! :o [evil] http://www.multistrada.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=17811&highlight=turbo (http://www.multistrada.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=17811&highlight=turbo) You need to be logged on to see this page. Title: Re: Turbo S2R Post by: Triple J on August 06, 2009, 02:05:47 PM You need to be logged on to see this page. Oops...here's his link. http://www.jedispark.com/me_bikes/Ducati_Multistrada_%28post_Turbo%29.html (http://www.jedispark.com/me_bikes/Ducati_Multistrada_%28post_Turbo%29.html) Title: Re: Turbo S2R Post by: NAKID on August 06, 2009, 03:50:06 PM Oops...here's his link. http://www.jedispark.com/me_bikes/Ducati_Multistrada_%28post_Turbo%29.html (http://www.jedispark.com/me_bikes/Ducati_Multistrada_%28post_Turbo%29.html) Wow, that could almost pass as stock... Title: Re: Turbo S2R Post by: bigiain on August 06, 2009, 06:14:01 PM Why would anybody go to all that trouble to get 100 hp when any decent used 03 - 06 S4R will put out well over 100 hp at the rear wheel with no mods at all? <devils advocate hat> Why would you spend all that money on an 03 - 06 S4R when any '99 Japanese 600 will put out over 100hp at the rear wheel and it'll run faster top speed and corner faster?</devis advocate hat> big (who can currently buy a brand new Hyosung with more power than my 11 year old Monster for less than I'd get selling even my 250,000km old Monster... But I'm not going too...) Title: Re: Turbo S2R Post by: LA on August 07, 2009, 08:49:59 AM <devils advocate hat>
Why would you spend all that money on an 03 - 06 S4R when any '99 Japanese 600 will put out over 100hp at the rear wheel and it'll run faster top speed and corner faster?</devis advocate hat> In your dreams dude ........ in your dreams. [laugh] [laugh] LA Title: Re: Turbo S2R Post by: Popeye the Sailor on August 07, 2009, 04:07:35 PM <devils advocate hat> Why would you spend all that money on an 03 - 06 S4R when any '99 Japanese 600 will put out over 100hp at the rear wheel and it'll run faster top speed and corner faster?</devis advocate hat> In your dreams dude ........ in your dreams. [laugh] [laugh] LA Uh, he's probably right, or close to it. Also, some carriers insure by CC, so the Japanese bike owuld be cheaper to insure, too. Title: Re: Turbo S2R Post by: Statler on August 07, 2009, 04:16:53 PM I'd personally rather ride with and see a bunch of completely changed and modified bikes (of all brands) than a gaggle of completely stock ones, and I never got the 'for the same money you could have had_______' arguments. Part of the fun is seeing what other people's interests in bikes are.
turbo s2r a girl's bike. hahahahahaha. oh the poor 620 riders now. ;D Title: Re: Turbo S2R Post by: LA on August 07, 2009, 04:33:26 PM Uh, he's probably right, or close to it. Also, some carriers insure by CC, so the Japanese bike owuld be cheaper to insure, too. Sorry pal. Not even make the beast with two backsing close. The S4R/RS being very competitive with anything out there (in the right hands)? This is not something I'm guessing about. Staying in front of present day 600's Jap bikes with very good riders on em is not just possible in my old feeble mind - been there, done that, got the tattoo. And the ONLY place the 1000's can do it is after the turn is finished. In some places there is little substitute for HP - 130 can't compete well with 160 on a very long straight. There's nothing "special" about me, I just can't let that shit go without at least a little defense. The bike weighs 420 lbs. full of gas, water and oil and makes 130 hp at the wheel (wish I could afford those wheels Statler's got). Live in the Blue Ridge Mts. and ride 1000 mi. a month and been doing it for longer than you've been alive. I got socks older. ;D :o Insurance cheaper? My Kitted RS is a "cruiser" according to my insurance company - $350 per year for comprehensive coverage. Try that with a 20 something on a current 600 cc sport bike. The coverage will cost more than the bike. If you are lucky, some day all the young guns will think you are all washed up because you're old enough to be their dad. ;D Love ya ...... mean it. [thumbsup] [moto] [thumbsup] LA Title: Re: Turbo S2R Post by: Popeye the Sailor on August 07, 2009, 07:03:30 PM Sorry pal. Not even make the beast with two backsing close. The S4R/RS being very competitive with anything out there (in the right hands)? This is not something I'm guessing about. Staying in front of present day 600's Jap bikes with very good riders on em is not just possible in my old feeble mind - been there, done that, got the tattoo. And the ONLY place the 1000's can do it is after the turn is finished. In some places there is little substitute for HP - 130 can't compete well with 160 on a very long straight. There's nothing "special" about me, I just can't let that shit go without at least a little defense. Okay for starters, no one is saying an S4R can't keep up with one of those bikes. Nor is that relevant. We're talking plain old specifications. The bike weighs 420 lbs. full of gas, water and oil and makes 130 hp at the wheel (wish I could afford those wheels Statler's got). Live in the Blue Ridge Mts. and ride 1000 mi. a month and been doing it for longer than you've been alive. I got socks older. ;D :o The bike most certainly does not weigh that, nor produce that amount of power. Keep in mind only the S4R was mentioned-NOT the S4Rs. According to http://www.bikez.com/motorcycles/ducati_monster_s4r_2006.php (http://www.bikez.com/motorcycles/ducati_monster_s4r_2006.php) We have a HP rating of 115. As far as I recall, Ducati currently measures at the crank, so the rear wheel sees less than that. The wet weight is not listed on that site, but going to http://www.sportrider.com/weights_measurements/146_motorcycle_weights_measurements/ducati.html (http://www.sportrider.com/weights_measurements/146_motorcycle_weights_measurements/ducati.html) Will show a listed wet weight of 459 pounds for an '05 S4R. Let's compare that to a 1999 Japanese bike. The YZF-R6 (600CC) http://www.bikez.com/motorcycles/yamaha_yzf-r6_1999.php (http://www.bikez.com/motorcycles/yamaha_yzf-r6_1999.php) Shows a HP rating of 120HP (where the rating is I don't know, but assuming the lesser amount of at the crank, it still produces more than the Duc). The weight listed 430 pounds. So, more horsepower, less weight, a good several years before the S4R. I don't see how your age is relevant, but for god sakes, buy new socks. Insurance cheaper? My Kitted RS is a "cruiser" according to my insurance company - $350 per year for comprehensive coverage. Try that with a 20 something on a current 600 cc sport bike. The coverage will cost more than the bike. If you are lucky, some day all the young guns will think you are all washed up because you're old enough to be their dad. ;D Love ya ...... mean it. [thumbsup] [moto] [thumbsup] LA Like I said-it depends on you're insurer. Previous ones I've had based it SOLELY on CC. AKA power to weight didn't matter. Which is why I stated it's possible ones insurance could go down, especially with the fact that a 1999 vintage as I referenced, would be much older than any S4R, and far less valuable. Yes, I'm that bored. [cheeky] Title: Re: Turbo S2R Post by: LA on August 07, 2009, 08:24:55 PM Sorry, I guess that's a little too much bravado even for me. Sent you a PM explaining what I meant.
The 600 was rated differently and didn't make more power or weigh less. Almost identical specs with the 03 s4r actually. I looked it all up too. Can't sleep. [coffee] LA |