Ducati Monster Forum

Moto Board => Accessories & Mods => Topic started by: muskrat on October 07, 2009, 07:39:20 PM



Title: corbin or sargeants?
Post by: muskrat on October 07, 2009, 07:39:20 PM
which seat is best? 


Title: Re: corbin or sargeants?
Post by: redial on October 08, 2009, 04:10:33 AM
going to be personal opinion, but i really like the corbins

harder to find than sargents, and more expensive to boot

DP gel seat gets good reviews too  [thumbsup]


Title: Re: corbin or sargeants?
Post by: muskrat on October 08, 2009, 04:20:50 AM
I have the DP seat now and it's too soft.  can't part with some $500 for a seat.......hurts bad.


Title: Re: corbin or sargeants?
Post by: RB on October 08, 2009, 06:16:36 AM
I have the DP gel, and actually like its feel better then the Corbin or Sargent. I beleive the fabric the Sargent and Corbin is more durable, i am refering to the softness in this case. I have done 600miles in a day and no butt pain. FYI, i wiegh 150lbs, and 5'7".
Plus the DP seat is only $220 US.

try to test out all of the mentioned first, your butt may vary from others.



Title: Re: corbin or sargeants?
Post by: Slide Panda on October 08, 2009, 06:33:27 AM
One nod to the Sargeant is the smuggler tube under the seat - it's a handy feature. On the down side, there's about 0 padding for a passenger as a result.

Also something to think about it is seat shape. The Sargent seat is wider in back than the stock or dp one. Depending on your build, that additional width may not be as comfy as the thinner stock profile.


Title: Re: corbin or sargeants?
Post by: causeofkaos on October 08, 2009, 07:11:57 AM
if you buy from Corbin, forget customer service. i got a seat from them, if i had to do it again i would NOT get the Corbin. They say the seat padding foam breaks in after 2000 miles mine has yet to feel like a well broken in seat after 3000 miles. And the fitment on the bike was off, also on mine for the 696 the rivets that hold the material on the base pan were set to close to the edge causing them to rub against my subframe. Flatblack subframe with 2 shiny aluminum dimples. I cant get corbin to even pretend to care.


Title: Re: corbin or sargeants?
Post by: arai_speed on October 08, 2009, 08:53:55 AM
Here is a good discussion the topic:

http://ducatimonsterforum.org/index.php?topic=10170.0 (http://ducatimonsterforum.org/index.php?topic=10170.0)


Title: Re: corbin or sargeants?
Post by: RVA Duc on October 08, 2009, 12:15:29 PM
I have a Corbin. I like it doesn't hurt my tail end after a few hrs of riding. [thumbsup]


Title: Re: corbin or sargeants?
Post by: muskrat on October 08, 2009, 12:52:47 PM
I know Corbin's service stinks.  I've had similar issues.

now, does anyone want to sell me their Sargeant with a DP in trade?  ???


Title: Re: corbin or sargeants?
Post by: erkishhorde on October 08, 2009, 04:05:49 PM
I thought you couldn't get Corbin seats anymore...


Title: Re: corbin or sargeants?
Post by: erkishhorde on October 08, 2009, 04:07:12 PM
One nod to the Sargeant is the smuggler tube under the seat - it's a handy feature. On the down side, there's about 0 padding for a passenger as a result.

Also something to think about it is seat shape. The Sargent seat is wider in back than the stock or dp one. Depending on your build, that additional width may not be as comfy as the thinner stock profile.

Sargeants seats also slope up toward the tank which isn't good for tank huggers like myself.


Title: Re: corbin or sargeants?
Post by: Rameses on October 08, 2009, 08:59:50 PM
I thought you couldn't get Corbin seats anymore...


As of when?


I have a Corbin on my '08 HYM.




Title: Re: corbin or sargeants?
Post by: erkishhorde on October 08, 2009, 10:48:56 PM
good luck getting a corbin seat. i hear they are rapidly sinking, and are failing miserably at that whole customer service aspect of running a business. for reference, i have 10 unreplied emails, and 10 unanswered/unreturned phone calls.

Iono... I was thinking of this post.


Title: Re: corbin or sargeants?
Post by: muskrat on October 09, 2009, 05:51:11 AM
Iono... I was thinking of this post.

I've heard the same thing and I understand parts unlimited may be dropping them (rumor mind you) and that would signal BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD things for them.


Title: Re: corbin or sargeants?
Post by: 10/10ths on October 10, 2009, 01:34:53 PM
I own both for my '97 Monster.

The Corbin is covered in leather and is one inch lower than stock and lower than the Sargeant.

The Sargeant is covered in a synthetic material, is taller, and has a storage tube underneath that will hold tools, a small beer can, tire "Seal & Air" tire fix-a-flat, or anything else you need to carry.

I prefer the Sargeant.

I am willing to sell my Corbin to anyone who wants a Corbin for a pre-2001 Monster.

Cheers.


Title: Re: corbin or sargeants?
Post by: superjohn on October 10, 2009, 03:39:44 PM
I've got Sargent seats on both bikes and really like them. They're very comfortable for one up riding (I don't normally have passengers), well made, and look good.

I've heard Corbin is/was about to go out of business unless they could find a buyer.

http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2009/02/17/corbin-pacific-motorcycle-seat-maker-up-for-sale/ (http://thekneeslider.com/archives/2009/02/17/corbin-pacific-motorcycle-seat-maker-up-for-sale/)


Title: Re: corbin or sargeants?
Post by: rgramjet on October 10, 2009, 05:31:04 PM
The corbin is a better looking seat and sits lower as stated before.

The Sargent is more comfortable and has more gizmos which I find handy.  Pull out tie down hooks and the storage cannister are great!


Title: Re: corbin or sargeants?
Post by: mattyvas on October 10, 2009, 08:16:47 PM
I have a Sargent which I kept of my previous bike to use on the current bike.
Even though the new one came with a Corbin which I think is like sitting on a surfboard.
It came off straight away and is tucked away along with the stock seat.

I like the Sargent, all the gadgets plus very comfortable.


Title: Re: corbin or sargeants?
Post by: RB on October 11, 2009, 05:30:53 AM
Oh i forgot to mention....
The DP Gel seat also has tie-downs that tuck away when not in use.

And it has the same storage as the stock seat....actually i think it is slightly larger then the stock seat.
However, thread now seems to be strictly about whether a Corbin is better then a Sargent seat or vice-versa. I like my DP Gel alot, and for the price you can't beat it.


Title: Re: corbin or sargeants?
Post by: kp on October 11, 2009, 05:43:36 AM
I had this same dilemma in May and drove myself crazy doing research on which seat to buy for my 06 M620. I sat on and looked at both Corbin and Sargent. I went with the Sargent in the perforated leather and red (matches the bike) welt. I LOVE this seat, took the bike from MN out west for 10 days and had NO butt fatigue at all. We did a ton of riding, our least mileage day was 250, (due to a chain & sprocket issue) and the most mileage day was 619. The Sargent in my humble opinion is a better looking and more finished looking seat and the customer service rivals Nordstroms. My local fav motorbike dealer had a Corbin that someone ordered and was prepared to sell me at cost because Corbin wouldn't take it back, but it looked rough and unfinished next to a Sargent. I truly feel that comfort is more important than how a seat looks though, and I am completely satisfied with both aspects of my Sargent. And the hooks and trunk tube are great!


Title: Re: corbin or sargeants?
Post by: djrashonal on October 20, 2009, 07:40:59 PM
I know Corbin's service stinks.  I've had similar issues.

now, does anyone want to sell me their Sargeant with a DP in trade?  ???

I might be interested.....


SimplePortal 2.1.1