Title: Anyone else prefer the stock clutch slave cylinder? Post by: MAXdB on February 04, 2010, 09:57:12 PM Almost a year and a half ago, I was in an accident involving my gf's R6 that left me with a broken left radius as well as a couple broken fingers..sad for the totaled R6 but very good for my monster :) ..anyway, so when I finally recuperated enough to where I thought I could ride again, it was the clutch pull that was preventing me from being able to ride for more than 15 minutes at a time (my grip strength was very weak). I eventually went with the STM 28mm clutch slave which definitely helped and made life easier.. However, over the last 6-7k miles although everything associated with the new clutch slave was fine--finding neutral, clutch pull, changing gears--it never was quite as sweet as the way the stock clutch slave felt snicking through the gears.
So now that I have my grip strength back I spent the 15 minutes to put my stock one back on and the bike feels SOOOO much better! So I guess my question is... am I the only one that feels that the smaller 26mm feels better than the larger clutch slaves? And does anybody know of any 26mm aftermarket clutch slaves? Thanks! Title: Re: Anyone else prefer the stock clutch slave cylinder? Post by: He Man on February 04, 2010, 10:23:16 PM was the 28mm slave installed correctly? I think the aftermarket ones are smoother and more responsive.
Title: Re: Anyone else prefer the stock clutch slave cylinder? Post by: Bizzarrini on February 05, 2010, 12:15:01 AM With the larger diameter slaves comes a decreased clutch release (amount of displaced fluid is constant, so larger diameter = less travel). This could mean the plates aren't fully disengaging. I had the same problem when my new slave was just installed. I couldn't get the bike into neutral at all! After some adjustments it got a bit better, but it still fails to go into neutral sometimes when i'm at complete standstill. When I'm still going at a couple of mph, there doesn't seem to be any trouble. Upside is the lighter pull, but I guess it also has it's disadvantages...
Title: Re: Anyone else prefer the stock clutch slave cylinder? Post by: Duck-Stew on February 05, 2010, 03:59:07 AM I put a brass bushing in an 07 S4Rs stock slave cylinder so it would work on my 95 M900 and it's a big improvement over the 15yo stocker. The stock units from 2001 on are really good pieces (IMHO) but sometimes get swapped out b/c they don't look pretty... Not that this is the case w/the OP, just an observation.
Title: Re: Anyone else prefer the stock clutch slave cylinder? Post by: yotogi on February 05, 2010, 06:27:51 AM To be honest, I like the heavy clutch. It makes shifting very deliberate and I don't feel like it makes my shifts any slower. Besides my left hand is now as strong as my right. [evil]
From using a mouse, I write code all day. Title: Re: Anyone else prefer the stock clutch slave cylinder? Post by: gage on February 05, 2010, 11:59:59 AM From using a mouse, I write code all day. If you say so...I like the stock one also Title: Re: Anyone else prefer the stock clutch slave cylinder? Post by: ducpainter on February 05, 2010, 12:44:59 PM I've always run stockers.
The bikes shift flawlessly, even into neutral at a stop. If it doesn't it's leaking. Title: Re: Anyone else prefer the stock clutch slave cylinder? Post by: Tangerine Dream on February 09, 2010, 07:27:11 PM I've never had anything other than a stocker. It's always felt solid to me.
Title: Re: Anyone else prefer the stock clutch slave cylinder? Post by: Ivan on February 10, 2010, 07:03:09 AM I also prefer the stock slave cylinder.
Title: Re: Anyone else prefer the stock clutch slave cylinder? Post by: Xerxes1769 on February 10, 2010, 03:27:12 PM +1 on the stockers...
|