(http://i46.photobucket.com/albums/f150/trevorestvanik/sump2.jpg)
(http://i46.photobucket.com/albums/f150/trevorestvanik/testdrive.jpg)
Wait for it...
(http://i46.photobucket.com/albums/f150/trevorestvanik/wholerunning3.jpg)
Nadya Suleman injection
Doesn't look right, I think it's missing a turbo.
The ..um.. 'logo' on the top of the air-intake is classic. [thumbsup]
Now that's a sleeper, wonder what it's putting down
Looks like ass but if he got it to work even halfway decently it's kinda cool in an oddball way.
this thread needs a theme song
Judas Priest-Turbo Lover (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfDVY9pK2Oc#normal)
"gadzooks"
:o
the turbos are cool, but check out those fuel rails and lines!
awesome.
this is the kind of car that i really love [thumbsup]
Big fan of sleeper cars. ;)
I'd prolly go as far as washing it tho...
couple of thing i wonder.
are they blowoff valves? what does that thing sound like? what kind of tranny is handling that kind of power?
the only other car i know of that has 4 turbos is the Bugatti Veyron, wonder if this thing is approaching that kind of HP.
Bugatti has a few more cylinders than this does but I am curious too as to how much power he's making.
It appears to be an auto trans... the Torqueflite 727's are a beefy unit. I don't see the 904 holding up to tons of power.
A 727 behind this motor would handle it and since it's a Fury III, it's likely got the Chrysler 8 3/4" axle which could also be made to handle the power.
I'd rock it. [evil]
(back in Detroit I saw a beer-bottle brown 4-door 1983(ish) Ford mid-sized LTD with a (supposedly) stroked 351W and a BIG honkin' turbo on it.... That frickin' car was QUICK!)
I love a a good sleeper car.
Back in the late 70's my friends dad had a Chevy truck that looked stock...it actually scared people who rode in it with him. [evil] [laugh]
sleeper car (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A203ShFM854#vhq)
[laugh]
Quote from: bobspapa on March 06, 2010, 06:31:10 AM
sleeper car (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A203ShFM854#vhq)
[laugh]
[clap] Beautiful performance!
Betcha that guy has soiled a few people's britches too! [laugh]
Quote from: Raux on March 05, 2010, 11:56:00 PM
the turbos are cool, but check out those fuel rails and lines!
What's wrong with them?
Quote from: Raux on March 06, 2010, 03:16:50 AM
couple of thing i wonder.
are they blowoff valves? what does that thing sound like? what kind of tranny is handling that kind of power?
the only other car i know of that has 4 turbos is the Bugatti Veyron, wonder if this thing is approaching that kind of HP.
Looks like just one BOV. Can't see why you'd need more than one. Probably sounds bad-make the beast with two backsing-ass!!
I doubt that it's even close to the veyrons power numbers. Adding more turbos doesn't really mean more power. The rule of thumb on home done car is 10-15hp per pound of boost. That's an average.
You can run one huge turbo, two smaller turbos, 4 even smaller turbos or 8 tiny little turbos and achieve roughly the same power numbers.
This is a really really really cool project.
I would drive it and love it.
I would not wash it. Don't want anyone getting suspicious ;D
the fuel system is truly beefy. [thumbsup]
ooooooohhh. . . i get it
;D
is he ever going to make space for intercoolers?
They're not always needed though. I have a friend running a single holset on his 302 non intercooled and it made 450ft lbs with a so-so tune.
Quote from: Duck-Stew on March 06, 2010, 06:22:21 AM
A 727 behind this motor would handle it and since it's a Fury III, it's likely got the Chrysler 8 3/4" axle which could also be made to handle the power.
The stock mopar parts, at least in the V8's, were pretty beefy.
Mmmm-Mopar V8's.