Ducati Monster Forum

Kitchen Sink => No Moto Content => Topic started by: il d00d on April 22, 2010, 10:51:46 AM

Title: Our tech-savvy Supreme Court; or why they are "not on The Facebooks"
Post by: il d00d on April 22, 2010, 10:51:46 AM
 WSJ article  (http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2010/04/19/our-tech-savvy-supreme-court/)
"According to the story, the first sign of trouble came was about midway through the argument, when Chief Justice John Roberts asked what the difference was 'between email and a pager?'"

I think he means legally, but still...

Further reading (http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/2010/04/19/the-supreme-court-talks-about-an-employees-right-to-private-sexting/)
"Based on their ages alone, it's not surprising that many of the Justices are not technophiles (John Paul Stevens, 89; Antonin Scalia, 73; Anthony Kennedy, 73; Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 76; Stephen Breyer, 71)"
Title: Re: Our tech-savvy Supreme Court; or why they are "not on The Facebooks"
Post by: zooom on April 22, 2010, 10:58:11 AM
I bet they don't have 8-Tracks in their cars!
Title: Re: Our tech-savvy Supreme Court; or why they are "not on The Facebooks"
Post by: RAT900 on April 22, 2010, 10:59:19 AM
a stack of 78 rpms and a wind-up Victrola
Title: Re: Our tech-savvy Supreme Court; or why they are "not on The Facebooks"
Post by: Pip on April 22, 2010, 11:01:03 AM
Perhaps he meant "teH Facebookz"?

I can haz soopreem cort disishunz?
Title: Re: Our tech-savvy Supreme Court; or why they are "not on The Facebooks"
Post by: superjohn on April 22, 2010, 01:06:12 PM
And somehow, I think maybe they're better off.