http://www.wagnerlewis.com/site/ (http://www.wagnerlewis.com/site/)
Has anybody had any experience with these? I'm not likely to get one as I can think of a lot of other things to do before I spend 2k on a clutch.
I'm just curious how much of a difference these things make and why anybody would really want to drop that kind of money on one when you can replace the clutch for a couple hundred bucks if it is wearing out quickly.
what i have read from their literature is
1. it should last the life of the bike. so you save money in the long run
2. it provides consistent harder launches in that lifetime. so you save money not having to replace burnt clutches
3. it provides consistent predictable engagement. eliminating the need for high cost slipper clutches
so if you are looking for a higher quality clutch and have the upfront money as compared to replacements on intervals. it seems like a deal.
dumb. friction material wears no matter what.
buy a 48t slipper (evr) and be done.
like i said... it was their literature. not my experience
I wanna know...
Which SBK fanboy is going to convert his 848 to a dry clutch, and then buy this [laugh] [laugh]
i'd like to smack that person in the back of the head, condescendingly.