Ducati Monster Forum

I am working on having a run of these made.  ARCfab made this one and I have loved the look for a long time.  It would match to the stock udder or any header with the same 2 pipe locations.

Yes/No, what would you pay?

It would be a Y piece, a curve pipe and a small muffler as pictured.  The muffler will look different, probably will use something off the shelf for it, but the same idea will apply (i.e. oval, flat, etc)

(http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l309/ducatiz/DMF/7b1b45c0.jpg)

Single can under tail exhaust looks terrible IMHO.  Needs twin cans, or something integrated into the tail/tucked under where the light would be.  Otherwise, to me, it looks like something someone had made at a muffler shop.

m .05  [thumbsup]

twin can like a 916, right?

i like the single can, but i think you might be right.

you'll need to start looking at rear swingarm movement.

if it was tucked under the tail better it would look amazing, if the exhaust ended where the tail light is it would be perfect.

Where's the thread with this monster's exhaust?

(http://www.ducati.ms/forums/attachments/monster/49664d1245160821-s2r-s4r-undertail-exhaust-monster1ls6.jpg)


This may be more of what you're looking for.

Oh and for the love of God, stick some end caps in that tail chop!!!  [cheeky]

This Monster is fuggin' awesome.

that was the 696 from the Indy Grand prix 2 years ago i think.
the undertail flat exhaust took the place of the light.
really thought this would be the style they would go for the S4R replacement not the Streetfighter like they did.
The guy that built this one supposedly started offering them for sale.

I know that there were pics of the exhaust in another thread on here.

While i can appreciate the skill involved with making this exhaust I have to agree that twin exhaust would be better. 
Just my opinion


that is all
nothing follows

Anyone in Florida would have issues, since there was a law passed about the placement of the plate.

I've been thinking about doing an LED taillight for a while now, but the only thing that was stopping me was the glaring gap between the frame and the seat.  I think this would do nicely :)

Do you have any side shots?  What kind of midpipe compatibility are we talking about, or is it a full system?


As far as the two vs. one undertail goes, I think it depends on the bike.  While they're not pointy like a lot of the Japanese, I've always thought Monsters have a pretty thin rear end.  Tucking two big ass cans up there 1098 style would just jumble things up, but I agree the tip definitely needs to be located where the taillight presently is. 

http://www.ducatimonsterforum.org/index.php?topic=43386.15 (http://www.ducatimonsterforum.org/index.php?topic=43386.15)

Built by Brian Peterson

I have to disagree with others. I really like the look of the single can  [thumbsup] I would love to have something like this for my bike.

That's no 696.  Please note the 4V motor.

it looks great but it's impractical -- where is the tail light??

(http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4130/5082404830_8a7fe070bf_z.jpg)

ok... it started its life as a 696.

a 999 style tail light and tag system would just fine with this exhaust. i think the real problem would be the seat and cover. but i looks like he cut the seat pan as well.

How about a Desmo style GP exhaust? One under the tail, one in front of the rear wheel?

a gp style exhaust that is done well would look pretty sick, sort of a combo of boomtubes and underseat would be good if someone could do it right.

That is a pic of an old ARCfab exhaust. Pay attention will ya.

i like the idea of twin rounds, set slightly apart.

Just for the record the reason that has a single flat can is for tire clearance.

That's all that will fit under the tail of a Monster without frame mods.

I used to have a vid of the bike somewhere. Can't find it.

Wouldn't that muffler melt the plastic undertail?

IIRC that was removed

Maybe Mark can look into this...


I presume you would need to relocate a lot of wires as well.

I guess it could easily be replaced with an insulated two-piece aluminum undertail.

Found the vids...

http://frostysfinishes.com/media/MOV00018.MPG (http://frostysfinishes.com/media/MOV00018.MPG)

http://frostysfinishes.com/media/MOV00017.MPG (http://frostysfinishes.com/media/MOV00017.MPG)

http://frostysfinishes.com/media/MOV00019.MPG (http://frostysfinishes.com/media/MOV00019.MPG)

sounds fun, could be a bit deeper, but too bad nothing up close...

Doug took them with his phone on the street in front of BCM.

The sound is limited by the can.

I just wish I had more time to fiddle with it myself.  I think something wider would give a better sound.  Keep the same height.  But then the price goes up.. alas...

I'd like to have a twin exhaust set-up for my Arrow's.  I love the Arrow sound, but I kinda miss my twin set-up like my Sparks  were.  If you can come up with something that will except multiple cans (like Arrows), I'm in.