Title: aluminum vs lightened flywheels? Post by: BlackKat on March 06, 2011, 05:30:43 PM Just making my purchase list for the S2r1000 and I see a lot of people using lightened flywheels and few using actual aluminum flywheels...
it seems the aluminum are far lighter...is it just a cost issue or is there a down side to aluminum? Just wanted to be sure I'm not missing anything? Also, same principle to an aluminum clutch basket as the lightened flywheel? Title: Re: aluminum vs lightened flywheels? Post by: He Man on March 06, 2011, 05:38:11 PM Aren't the stock flywheels already aluminum?
Title: Re: aluminum vs lightened flywheels? Post by: kopfjäger on March 06, 2011, 05:38:39 PM I would go with a lightened stock flywheel.
Title: Re: aluminum vs lightened flywheels? Post by: ducpainter on March 06, 2011, 05:41:47 PM Some aluminum flywheels had issues with the splines.
The lightened stockers are bullet proof, plenty light, and less expensive. Title: Re: aluminum vs lightened flywheels? Post by: BlackKat on March 06, 2011, 05:43:32 PM They might be aluminum. I just have been reading about those people selling lightened stock flywheels for @ 75.00 and full aluminum that weigh under a pound (or whatever it is) for $200-300.00...
Whats the difference other than $125.00+? Title: Re: aluminum vs lightened flywheels? Post by: kopfjäger on March 06, 2011, 05:43:38 PM Aren't the stock flywheels already aluminum? They are steel Title: Re: aluminum vs lightened flywheels? Post by: kopfjäger on March 06, 2011, 05:45:43 PM The super light ones, like Nichols can be finicky in a street application.
Title: Re: aluminum vs lightened flywheels? Post by: He Man on March 06, 2011, 05:49:12 PM They are steel Ahh. DIdnt know that. The local shop said they do em for $75. They send em out to get milled and all. I have read that they are not a good idea for street bikes. Is it really a beneficial mod? Kinda like the crankcase breather mod... Title: Re: aluminum vs lightened flywheels? Post by: BlackKat on March 06, 2011, 05:51:34 PM Thats what I was after...It is a street bike...might be forced to a couple company sponsored track days, but a street bike for its life. I think a Ben Fox lightened flywheel is in my future when I get the HP pistons :)
I'd love to hear if anyone else has any words of wisdom or experience with Aluminum though... Title: Re: aluminum vs lightened flywheels? Post by: ducpainter on March 06, 2011, 06:43:22 PM Thats what I was after...It is a street bike...might be forced to a couple company sponsored track days, but a street bike for its life. I think a Ben Fox lightened flywheel is in my future when I get the HP pistons :) You should spend the extra money.I'd love to hear if anyone else has any words of wisdom or experience with Aluminum though... The company that sells them has a really expensive state of the art website. [thumbsup] Title: Re: aluminum vs lightened flywheels? Post by: BlackKat on March 06, 2011, 06:58:08 PM You should spend the extra money. The company that sells them has a really expensive state of the art website. [thumbsup] With exploding pics, prices and everything!? Touche my friend! [drink] Title: Re: aluminum vs lightened flywheels? Post by: hooligan machinist on March 06, 2011, 07:49:30 PM It could be a matter of perspective.
The nichols flywheel and high comp pistons made a huge difference in both throttle response and engine braking on my 750. I liked the new found life it gave the old gal. But it also made it very touchy in stop and go traffic.(aka: downside) Wrist control is an art form in it's own right. Title: Re: aluminum vs lightened flywheels? Post by: muskrat on March 06, 2011, 07:55:02 PM someone might have a turned down flywheel for sale. just saying....
I did it on mine and it's worth every penny; your mileage may vary. [thumbsup] Title: Re: aluminum vs lightened flywheels? Post by: kopfjäger on March 06, 2011, 08:20:58 PM It could be a matter of perspective. The nichols flywheel and high comp pistons made a huge difference in both throttle response and engine braking on my 750. I liked the new found life it gave the old gal. But it also made it very touchy in stop and go traffic.(aka: downside) Wrist control is an art form in it's own right. A lightened stock flywheel would have given you the same response, without the around town issues you ran into. ;) Title: Re: aluminum vs lightened flywheels? Post by: hooligan machinist on March 06, 2011, 08:38:18 PM I'm in 100% agreement with you on that. Except that you can't lighten a stock steel one down to 9oz. Which in hindsight is a bit much with the gearing changes i made. Down 1 on front and up 2 in the rear.
For mountain runs and off the line it's awesome for a 750, but yeah city riding can be some major suckage. And top end suffered about 20 mph. Gets there plenty fast, but long rides at high rpms are hard on it. I'm seriuosly considering going back to 15 teeth up front. Should still have plenty of balls but probably will never make a track bike. Title: Re: aluminum vs lightened flywheels? Post by: danaid on March 06, 2011, 10:23:27 PM It could be a matter of perspective. The nichols flywheel and high comp pistons made a huge difference in both throttle response and engine braking on my 750. I liked the new found life it gave the old gal. But it also made it very touchy in stop and go traffic.(aka: downside) Wrist control is an art form in it's own right. Did you notice any new engine vibrations with the lightened flywheel? Title: Re: aluminum vs lightened flywheels? Post by: BK_856er on March 06, 2011, 11:23:39 PM I have a nichols aluminum flywheel in my M695. I think it's a little over a year old at this point with about 6k miles on it. No problems at all. I would not go back to the stock flywheel, but as mentioned the nichols requires a finer touch on the throttle and the engine braking feel is a bit different. There might be some more vibes, but nothing irritating or mirror-blurring. I have no issue with around town riding. I had it out recently to do some shift linkage work and the flywheel splines looked absolutely perfect. Just a datapoint...
BK Title: Re: aluminum vs lightened flywheels? Post by: koko64 on March 07, 2011, 02:01:14 AM My steel flywheel had about a kilo machined off. It's about 900 grams now. I think that is a good compromise.
I have had a DP alloy flywheel on another 900 2 valver, and it was quite a bit lighter. The bikes had the same mods, FCRs, hi comp pistons, dialed cams, Vee Two light clutches, open A/B. The lighter flywheel was more snatchy down low and caused more engine braking than I liked. The machined flywheel feels about just right to me. It's a matter of personal taste, however. Title: Re: aluminum vs lightened flywheels? Post by: brad black on March 08, 2011, 05:19:20 PM the flywheel impacts inertia of the crank assembly. inertia is mass time radius squared.
the dp aluminium flywheel looked like a std one, but was al and about 1/3 of the weight, so had 1/3 of the inertia. we had a couple of them lose their splines years ago, so we stopped using them. this was about the time the torque on the rotor nut went up from 180 to 270nm, which could have been a contributing issue. a steel one on a fuel injected bike goes down from 148mm to 120mm od when i do them, and the weight from 1900 to 875 grams. combined i guess the reduction in inertia is .46 x .81 x .81 = .3 in very round numbers. so about the same. the carb bikes have the lump for the pick ups on the od, so you can't just take them down like a injected bike one. i took my 750m one down form 1900 to 1400 grams from memory being cautious. i did have a pre 98 600 flywheel on it previously to refitting the lightened 750 one as i'd played with the pick up trigger lump in conjunction with the ignitech. the 600 flywheel is a stamped steel dish weighing about 650 grams. went great, no low speed issues at all. just went harder and lifted the front wheel faster was about all i noticed. my 851 has an old dp one for the p7/p8 ecu, it's al with a steel ring bolted to the outer edge with 4 lumps on it, just like the dp ones for single phase alt 2v carb motors. it's about 690 grams, which is a bit of a theme. ime the injected bikes are a touch smoother with the flywheel machined. no idea why, but it's a common feeling from me and customers. it does exagerate poor low speed tuning, which in turn can make them unpleasant to ride. std crank weights 4.5kg, sp/r style crank 4kg. plus the alt rotor, starter clutch carrier, primary gear. there's still a lot of weight there. but look at an 848 crank and flywheel and you'll see how far the factory has gone in reducing the weight. personally it's one of the mods i'd make to anything after doing the cam timing. Title: Re: aluminum vs lightened flywheels? Post by: TAftonomos on March 08, 2011, 05:38:39 PM I've had the cheapo SSR aftermarket aluminum flywheel on the last dozen ducati's I've had. Made sure the threads were clean, seated the thing properly, used loctite and the double nuts that come with it, and torqued to spec.
Never had an issue that people claim the splines shear off the thing. Never thought....man, I shouldn't have done that the bike is terrible. Always a positive mod, and one of the first to be done after setting up the forks/shock for my weight. Title: Re: aluminum vs lightened flywheels? Post by: BlackKat on March 12, 2011, 05:32:53 PM Looks like I'm leaning towards the lightened stock flywheel. Does anyone know if there are any suppliers that offer them in their stock or have a core on yours to cut down on the down time of waiting for my flywheel to get turned down? We use Ben Fox. He does amazing work, but he's always really busy and Spring is creeping up on us in Ohio fast!
Title: Re: aluminum vs lightened flywheels? Post by: ducpainter on March 13, 2011, 07:34:24 AM Looks like I'm leaning towards the lightened stock flywheel. Does anyone know if there are any suppliers that offer them in their stock or have a core on yours to cut down on the down time of waiting for my flywheel to get turned down? We use Ben Fox. He does amazing work, but he's always really busy and Spring is creeping up on us in Ohio fast! Try eric@clubhousemotorsports.com 603-393-8945.He had an assortment of lightened stockers hanging on the board ready to go earlier this winter, and he's a sponsor. Title: Re: aluminum vs lightened flywheels? Post by: BlackKat on March 13, 2011, 01:21:28 PM Dropped him a line-Thanks!
Title: Re: aluminum vs lightened flywheels? Post by: koko64 on March 15, 2011, 02:57:23 AM I reckon that's they way to go as far as bang for buck is concerned.
Given my comments, I'm still curious to try a very light Nichols flywheel. They are very light. The light DP flywheel on my Superlight had me hopping the rear into corners and wanting a slipper clutch. I found this effect was reduced with a light clutch (basket, hub/drum and plates). There was a relationship there. Title: Re: aluminum vs lightened flywheels? Post by: BlackKat on March 15, 2011, 06:58:36 PM Well, I emailed Eric on Sunday and never heard back. A DMF member emailed me and had one (lightened stock) at a great price, so I hope to do a nice before and after review on an otherwise bone stock s2r1000. The FBF pistons are in route and I'm considering the lightened adjustable timing pulleys...
well see if I can make a peppy retro cafe bike outa this one.... Title: Re: aluminum vs lightened flywheels? Post by: Goduc on March 15, 2011, 10:52:12 PM A lightened stock flywheel would have given you the same response, without the around town issues you ran into. ;) Not possible. The difference made is due to the reduction in rotating mass, If the stock machined flywheel weighed the same as a Nichols, for instance, they would behave exactly the same. In fact, the only way they would have the same characteristics is if they weighed the same. As for the engine braking I had a hard time noticing it, I had a Corsa Racing Slipper clutch installed in mine the same time as the lightweight flywheel. I love the combo!Title: Re: aluminum vs lightened flywheels? Post by: kopfjäger on March 16, 2011, 12:19:41 AM Not possible. The difference made is due to the reduction in rotating mass, If the stock machined flywheel weighed the same as a Nichols, for instance, they would behave exactly the same. In fact, the only way they would have the same characteristics is if they weighed the same. As for the engine braking I had a hard time noticing it, I had a Corsa Racing Slipper clutch installed in mine the same time as the lightweight flywheel. I love the combo! The nichols or other super lightweight flywheels are for race applications not the street. Title: Re: aluminum vs lightened flywheels? Post by: Raux on March 16, 2011, 09:03:05 AM Not possible. The difference made is due to the reduction in rotating mass, If the stock machined flywheel weighed the same as a Nichols, for instance, they would behave exactly the same. In fact, the only way they would have the same characteristics is if they weighed the same. As for the engine braking I had a hard time noticing it, I had a Corsa Racing Slipper clutch installed in mine the same time as the lightweight flywheel. I love the combo! pure physics, it's not just the weight, but the distribution of that weight on a rotating part. so say a steel flywheel has been reduce in diameter to be lighter vs a full size aluminum that is lighter than stock but the same as said reduce diameter steel... they would have different characteristics Title: Re: aluminum vs lightened flywheels? Post by: Goduc on March 16, 2011, 11:56:59 AM The nichols or other super lightweight flywheels are for race applications not the street. Well, I have been using it in a street application for about 8,000 miles and its worked great the whole time... Title: Re: aluminum vs lightened flywheels? Post by: Goduc on March 16, 2011, 11:57:47 AM pure physics, it's not just the weight, but the distribution of that weight on a rotating part. True, but I was assuming that much. Too much to assume apparently.so say a steel flywheel has been reduce in diameter to be lighter vs a full size aluminum that is lighter than stock but the same as said reduce diameter steel... they would have different characteristics Title: Re: aluminum vs lightened flywheels? Post by: 118811 on November 20, 2012, 01:58:22 PM I have a nichols aluminum flywheel in my M695. I think it's a little over a year old at this point with about 6k miles on it. No problems at all. I would not go back to the stock flywheel, but as mentioned the nichols requires a finer touch on the throttle and the engine braking feel is a bit different. There might be some more vibes, but nothing irritating or mirror-blurring. I have no issue with around town riding. I had it out recently to do some shift linkage work and the flywheel splines looked absolutely perfect. Just a datapoint... BK +! I too have the Nichol's on my M900. No issues in traffic at all. |