|
Title: Well, they sure make the beast with two backsed that up. Post by: DRKWNG on November 24, 2012, 06:48:56 PM http://www.motorcycle-usa.com/643/14883/Motorcycle-Article/2013-Triumph-Daytona-675-and-675R-First-Look.aspx (http://www.motorcycle-usa.com/643/14883/Motorcycle-Article/2013-Triumph-Daytona-675-and-675R-First-Look.aspx)
http://www.asphaltandrubber.com/bikes/2013-triumph-daytona-675r/ (http://www.asphaltandrubber.com/bikes/2013-triumph-daytona-675r/) Title: Re: Well, they sure make the beast with two backsed that up. Post by: jaxduc on November 24, 2012, 07:07:14 PM ???
Title: Re: Well, they sure make the beast with two backsed that up. Post by: Triple J on November 24, 2012, 07:33:08 PM I don't think it looks too bad.
Title: Re: Well, they sure make the beast with two backsed that up. Post by: muskrat on November 24, 2012, 07:47:04 PM [thumbsdown] [thumbsdown]
Title: Re: Well, they sure make the beast with two backsed that up. Post by: extra330 on November 24, 2012, 07:47:40 PM Looks like a Yamaha [thumbsdown]
Title: Re: Well, they sure make the beast with two backsed that up. Post by: He Man on November 24, 2012, 08:02:18 PM really? i thought it looked like a CBR.
Title: Re: Well, they sure make the beast with two backsed that up. Post by: ItsaDuc on November 24, 2012, 08:25:19 PM Looks like a Yamaha [thumbsdown] First thing I thought. Looks like an r6 about 3-4 years ago. Title: Re: Well, they sure make the beast with two backsed that up. Post by: kopfjäger on November 24, 2012, 10:10:14 PM First thing I thought was Ducati still builds the best looking SBK's.
Title: Re: Well, they sure make the beast with two backsed that up. Post by: Monsterlover on November 25, 2012, 08:16:46 AM http://www.motorcycle-usa.com/643/14883/Motorcycle-Article/2013-Triumph-Daytona-675-and-675R-First-Look.aspx (http://www.motorcycle-usa.com/643/14883/Motorcycle-Article/2013-Triumph-Daytona-675-and-675R-First-Look.aspx) http://www.asphaltandrubber.com/bikes/2013-triumph-daytona-675r/ (http://www.asphaltandrubber.com/bikes/2013-triumph-daytona-675r/) I wouldn't say they make the beast with two backsed it up, but I will say it has evolved poorly. I'd still rock one, but I like the older ones better. Title: Re: Well, they sure make the beast with two backsed that up. Post by: DRKWNG on November 25, 2012, 08:21:27 AM I wouldn't say they make the beast with two backsed it up (http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/400x/27748752.jpg) Title: Re: Well, they sure make the beast with two backsed that up. Post by: Monsterlover on November 25, 2012, 08:22:06 AM Youd rather be seen on an R6 over one of those?
Title: Re: Well, they sure make the beast with two backsed that up. Post by: DucHead on November 25, 2012, 08:36:59 AM Meh...all sportbikes look alike. ;D
Title: Re: Well, they sure make the beast with two backsed that up. Post by: Travman on November 25, 2012, 08:48:26 AM Is that a third headlight?
(http://www.asphaltandrubber.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/2013-Triumph-Daytona-675R-12-635x1015.jpg) Title: Re: Well, they sure make the beast with two backsed that up. Post by: ItsaDuc on November 25, 2012, 08:50:06 AM I'd still rock one, but I like the older ones better. Sounds like a very familiar debate not long ago about monsters. Title: Re: Well, they sure make the beast with two backsed that up. Post by: DRKWNG on November 25, 2012, 08:54:03 AM Youd rather be seen on an R6 over one of those? Don't really care about being seen on, but the thing just looks like ass in my eyes. If anything, I'd pick up one of the remaining '12s that will be out there. Or, I'd just say F it and go whole hog with the RSV4R. Title: Re: Well, they sure make the beast with two backsed that up. Post by: Monsterlover on November 25, 2012, 08:57:48 AM Sounds like a very familiar debate not long ago about monsters. I like the older ones of those as well ;D Title: Re: Well, they sure make the beast with two backsed that up. Post by: Monsterlover on November 25, 2012, 08:58:52 AM Don't really care about being seen on, but the thing just looks like ass in my eyes. If anything, I'd pick up one of the remaining '12s that will be out there. Or, I'd just say F it and go whole hog with the RSV4R. I'd like to, at some point, pickup another 675. I was happy with my 06 I bought back in the day, but I have to say, the 675R has my interest (last years model) Title: Re: Well, they sure make the beast with two backsed that up. Post by: DRKWNG on November 25, 2012, 09:10:06 AM Eggxactly.
Title: Re: Well, they sure make the beast with two backsed that up. Post by: Pedro-bot on November 25, 2012, 10:29:54 AM I don't think it looks too bad. I don't think any manufacturer aims at building a bike "that doesn't look to bad." ;D Title: Re: Well, they sure make the beast with two backsed that up. Post by: MadDuck on November 25, 2012, 11:03:53 AM So far I like this one as much as I liked the first generation 675. Maybe a little more but I'll reserve final judgement until I see one in the flesh. The second generation 675 with the Darth Vader nose? I'll pass on that one.
Title: Re: Well, they sure make the beast with two backsed that up. Post by: DRKWNG on November 25, 2012, 11:28:20 AM Almost looks as if they've made the move to a plastic tank...
Title: Re: Well, they sure make the beast with two backsed that up. Post by: RC Fan on November 25, 2012, 11:33:11 AM I don't mind it except for the tail section/fender. It is the same one on the new Street Triple, and it makes me happy I bought mine this year.
Title: Re: Well, they sure make the beast with two backsed that up. Post by: Triple J on November 25, 2012, 05:06:27 PM I don't think any manufacturer aims at building a bike "that doesn't look to bad." ;D Probably not...but that's the best I could ever say about the 675. It's a cool bike, but hasn't ever been a great looking bike IMO. Title: Re: Well, they sure make the beast with two backsed that up. Post by: MadDuck on November 25, 2012, 07:25:27 PM So far I like this one as much as I liked the first generation 675. Maybe a little more but I'll reserve final judgement until I see one in the flesh. The second generation 675 with the Darth Vader nose? I'll pass on that one. Then I got a look at the head on / nose on shot. I'm not so sure anymore. ??? [puke] BTW --- it looks like I'm going to need another fuel tank for the 848. Title: Re: Well, they sure make the beast with two backsed that up. Post by: tuxicle on November 25, 2012, 07:48:33 PM I don't think any manufacturer aims at building a bike "that doesn't look to bad." ;D Even BMW? :DTitle: Re: Well, they sure make the beast with two backsed that up. Post by: kopfjäger on November 25, 2012, 09:43:43 PM Even BMW? :D Say what? [evil] (http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/aa91/chiflado/36df1254ca77fc4adf96a1cdd91f3ac9.jpg) Title: Re: Well, they sure make the beast with two backsed that up. Post by: DRKWNG on November 26, 2012, 03:41:42 AM Yeah, the S1K looks fine. Once you put a bag over its head.
Title: Re: Well, they sure make the beast with two backsed that up. Post by: webspoke on November 26, 2012, 07:59:45 PM The really sad part is so little technical change. Just +2hp and ft/lbs and only 3 pounds lighter than the bike developed 7years ago. The generic styling could be forgiven if it really moved the performance bar.
Title: Re: Well, they sure make the beast with two backsed that up. Post by: mitt on November 26, 2012, 08:18:50 PM Agreed, new one doesn't look as good as previous.
Title: Re: Well, they sure make the beast with two backsed that up. Post by: SDkid on November 26, 2012, 08:31:05 PM any thoughts if that rear subframe would fit on a new monster? It looks "trellis-enough" to be an improvement on the design flaw Ducati decided upon for the new models.
|