Ducati Monster Forum

Moto Board => Tech => Topic started by: NAKID on April 27, 2016, 02:30:47 PM

Title: Sprocket Ratio
Post by: NAKID on April 27, 2016, 02:30:47 PM
So, just a thought. Stock setup for the M821 is 15/46 (3.07). Would there be a benefit in terms of rotating mass to drop to a 14/43 (3.07)?

I mean, I imagine the weight savings on the front sprocket would be very minimal, but what about the rear? And what are the implications for a chain that is shorter (due to the smaller diameters) in terms of wear? I mean, I can imagine it would lose about 2 teeth minimum over the stock set up.

Thoughts?
Title: Re: Sprocket Ratio
Post by: ducpainter on April 27, 2016, 02:34:45 PM
Quote from: NAKID on April 27, 2016, 02:30:47 PM
<snip>

Thoughts?
Yes...too much. ;D
Title: Re: Sprocket Ratio
Post by: stopintime on April 27, 2016, 02:37:44 PM
Compared to a wheel at 10-15 lbs or a tire at about 15 lbs, both much further out - I'd forget about the rotating weight savings.

In theory, maybe also to some degree in real life, smaller sprockets wear the chain faster.

I support mods, but I think you should otherwise  [thumbsup]

Title: Re: Sprocket Ratio
Post by: koko64 on April 27, 2016, 02:43:10 PM
Is it over geared for your riding needs?
Title: Re: Sprocket Ratio
Post by: NAKID on April 27, 2016, 03:34:44 PM
Quote from: stopintime on April 27, 2016, 02:37:44 PM

I support mods, but I think you should otherwise  [thumbsup]



Not looking to do it in place of what I currently have. Just thinking for down the line when they need to be replaced.

Quote from: stopintime on April 27, 2016, 02:37:44 PM

In theory, maybe also to some degree in real life, smaller sprockets wear the chain faster.


I was thinking that too, one of the reasons I asked.

Quote from: ducpainter on April 27, 2016, 02:34:45 PM
Yes...too much. ;D

[laugh]

Quote from: koko64 on April 27, 2016, 02:43:10 PM
Is it over geared for your riding needs?

Not really. That's one of the reasons I wanted to keep the ratios the same.
Title: Re: Sprocket Ratio
Post by: cencalal on April 27, 2016, 05:10:25 PM
Smaller sprockets bring the chain closer to the swingarm, possibly causing a rub?

A hard anodized aluminum rear sprocket would be better - less rotating mass and unsprung weight.  They look nice too.
Title: Re: Sprocket Ratio
Post by: NAKID on April 27, 2016, 05:33:40 PM
Quote from: cencalal on April 27, 2016, 05:10:25 PM
Smaller sprockets bring the chain closer to the swingarm, possibly causing a rub?

A hard anodized aluminum rear sprocket would be better - less rotating mass and unsprung weight.  They look nice too.

I'm a commuter, going for longevity.
Title: Re: Sprocket Ratio
Post by: Charlie98 on April 27, 2016, 08:58:12 PM
Quote from: NAKID on April 27, 2016, 05:33:40 PM
I'm a commuter, going for longevity.

If you are happy with your ratios, just stick with what you have, in steel.
Title: Re: Sprocket Ratio
Post by: Howie on April 27, 2016, 11:16:13 PM
You can save weight with a Supersprox or Superlite sprocket and still have steel teeth.  Will it make a notable difference?  Doubt it.
Title: Re: Sprocket Ratio
Post by: jduke on April 29, 2016, 01:03:45 PM
Play around with this site some:
http://www.gearingcommander.com/ (http://www.gearingcommander.com/)