G'Day Ducatters,
Am I right in thinking that the '09 Monster 1100S rear subframe is different to '12 1100 EVO rear subframe?
EVO pillion footrest hangers are much less awful than the 696/796/1100 type....  but a distant memory makes me think that EVO passenger footpeg hangers on 1100S is not a doable thing....
Please chime in with your wisdom.
			
			
			
				Doable? Everything is doable  8)
			
			
			
				Quote from: stopintime on September 17, 2020, 10:49:14 AM
Doable? Everything is doable  8)
....see.... when I said ....'wisdom'..... I hadn't anticipated it arriving in the form of Norwegian philosophy.
By way of gratitude, I have some.... specially selected cold beer here for you (when it's safe to travel to these pox ridden parts)  [evil]
			
 
			
			
				Stu is responsible for the everything is doable attitude. Probably because he knows how.
			
			
			
				I have other options and so if this isn't a straightforward bolt on possibility, I'll be paying Mr Rizoma a call.
			
			
			
				IIRC there is a company who makes assemblies for the 1100 much like the EVO ones. CNC Racing maybe?
			
			
			
				The S and Evo have the same part numbers for the frames.
			
			
			
				https://www.carbon4us.com/en/696-795/6082-passenger-footpegs-carbon4us-monster.html
... maybe more.
			
			
			
				... what was that about beer?  [drink]
Aha!!! This should be in Acc & Mods  [leo]
			
			
			
				Quote from: stopintime on September 17, 2020, 12:29:48 PM
https://www.carbon4us.com/en/696-795/6082-passenger-footpegs-carbon4us-monster.html
... maybe more.
Ah... yes.  Now that I see those, I remember Raux had something very like those on his 696.   Seeing that cross-piece is reminding me why I think it's not going to work out with EVO pegs.  
(I've had a pair of EVO footpeg hangers offered to me, so the wondering is really all about will they bolt straight on).  
Quote from: howie on September 17, 2020, 12:07:55 PM
The S and Evo have the same part numbers for the frames.
The frames, yes.  The rear subframes, not so sure.  But you're right, I should just go compare the part numbers. 
			
 
			
			
				Quote from: stopintime on September 17, 2020, 01:08:31 PM
... what was that about beer?  [drink]
Aha!!! This should be in Acc & Mods  [leo]
http://www.ducatimonsterforum.org/index.php?topic=198.msg1442072#msg1442072 (http://www.ducatimonsterforum.org/index.php?topic=198.msg1442072#msg1442072)   ;)
			
 
			
			
				Quote from: ungeheuer on September 17, 2020, 01:11:52 PM
http://www.ducatimonsterforum.org/index.php?topic=198.msg1442072#msg1442072 (http://www.ducatimonsterforum.org/index.php?topic=198.msg1442072#msg1442072)   ;)
Reminds me of the Monty Python joke .....  similarities between making love in a canoe and Budweiser?
			
 
			
			
				..both make the beast with two backsin' water?
"both make the beast with two backsing close to water"   [laugh]
			
			
			
				I think you're SOL.
Early M1100 has the Gen1 and Gen2 style chicken wing footpeg assembly with integral pillion bits.
Late M1100 has S*R style footpeg assemblies and the seperate S*R style pillion bits.
Part#'s are totally different on the subframes between the 2.
Yes, Lars is correct and anything is possible.
Yes, you are receiving yet more Norwegian Philosophy.
If you had asked a New Zealander, he'd have had a foolproof plan of how you could do it with scrap of paper and a chocolate bar and you'd be done already.
			
			
			
				Quote from: Speeddog on September 17, 2020, 02:18:51 PM
I think you're SOL.
Part#'s are totally different on the subframes between the 2.
Thanks Speeddoggie - question answered  [thumbsup]  
Quote from: Speeddog on September 17, 2020, 02:18:51 PMIf you had asked a New Zealander, he'd have had a foolproof plan of how you could do it with scrap of paper and a chocolate bar and you'd be done already.
Similar in Australia, except it's done with a length of number 8 fence wire.
			
 
			
			
				Bravo all round fellas [clap] [laugh].