|
Title: Snapchat Post by: kopfjäger on September 24, 2016, 12:16:39 PM This thing has taken off. Now he developed a piece of hardware.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/snapchat-releases-first-hardware-product-spectacles-1474682719 (http://www.wsj.com/articles/snapchat-releases-first-hardware-product-spectacles-1474682719) Title: Re: Snapchat Post by: Heath on September 25, 2016, 09:32:41 AM To Read the Full Story, Subscribe or Sign In = Meh
edit: Here is a preview from their youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqkOFLBSJR8 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqkOFLBSJR8) Title: Re: Snapchat Post by: kopfjäger on September 25, 2016, 09:38:36 AM The article is in much more detail about the company. I'll try and find it without the pain and agony of having to type a few letters. :-*
Title: Re: Snapchat Post by: Monsterlover on September 30, 2016, 03:22:47 PM Worked for me no problem.
Im not buying the glasses. Title: Re: Snapchat Post by: kopfjäger on September 30, 2016, 03:54:37 PM [laugh] [laugh]
Title: Re: Snapchat Post by: herm on September 30, 2016, 06:40:24 PM Why does everything need to be video'd?
How can what happens in Vegas, stay in Vegas with this kind of technology? :-\ Title: Re: Snapchat Post by: kopfjäger on September 30, 2016, 06:42:03 PM It's too late now. Everything's been being videoed for years now. ;)
Title: Re: Snapchat Post by: Monsterlover on September 30, 2016, 06:44:02 PM Even Vegas hookers wear body cams
Title: Re: Snapchat Post by: kopfjäger on October 06, 2016, 08:40:08 PM http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/snapchat-ipo_us_57f6999be4b0c1a524cbef85 (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/snapchat-ipo_us_57f6999be4b0c1a524cbef85)
Title: Re: Snapchat Post by: MendoDave on October 18, 2016, 05:06:04 PM Meh..pretty sure James Bond had one of these in 1962. [cheeky]
Title: Re: Snapchat Post by: kopfjäger on February 02, 2017, 05:23:58 PM http://www.businessinsider.com/snap-to-list-on-nyse-report-2017-1
Title: Re: Snapchat Post by: Monsterlover on February 03, 2017, 09:30:54 AM That whole thing feels like a red flag.
Title: Re: Snapchat Post by: Speeddog on February 03, 2017, 10:35:43 AM The company lost half a billion dollars last year.
Can anyone explain how that looks like a good investment opportunity? Title: Re: Snapchat Post by: ducpainter on February 03, 2017, 10:42:01 AM The company lost half a billion dollars last year. Tax write off. [thumbsup]Can anyone explain how that looks like a good investment opportunity? Title: Re: Snapchat Post by: Duck-Stew on February 03, 2017, 11:36:11 AM The company lost half a billion dollars last year. Can anyone explain how that looks like a good investment opportunity? Losing money is the new black Title: Re: Snapchat Post by: kopfjäger on May 10, 2017, 08:12:43 PM https://www.theverge.com/2017/5/10/15610094/snap-snapchat-q1-2017-earnings-report-stock-plummets
Title: Re: Snapchat Post by: Drjones on May 15, 2017, 03:50:44 PM Thought people would've learned their lesson to avoid no-revenue hyped-up interwebs companies like that after the dot-com bust.
Title: Re: Snapchat Post by: duccarlos on May 16, 2017, 10:09:06 AM Hey, Amazon is not even profitable.
Title: Re: Snapchat Post by: Drjones on May 16, 2017, 05:07:57 PM Not quite. They may only make minimal profits on products sold, but more than make up for it on their web services side of the business.
Amazon has a free cash flow to net income ratio of 6 to 1. Primary growth rate metrics are all above 20% when looking at multiple time periods. Return on Invested Capital is above 25% when looking at multiple time periods. Return on Equity is a bit lower than I like, but is improving lately. Title: Re: Snapchat Post by: ducpainter on May 16, 2017, 05:11:40 PM Not quite. They may only make minimal profits on products sold, but more than make up for it on their web services side of the business. I was just gonna say...Amazon has a free cash flow to net income ratio of 6 to 1. Primary growth rate metrics are all above 20% when looking at multiple time periods. Return on Invested Capital is above 25% when looking at multiple time periods. Return on Equity is a bit lower than I like, but is improving lately. what...are you make the beast with two backsing nuts? Thanks. Title: Re: Snapchat Post by: Speeddog on August 11, 2017, 08:50:19 AM 2Q 2017 revenue doubled over 2Q 2016!
2Q 2017 losses quadrupled over 2Q 2016! Estimates of $3 Billion losses for 2017! Looking more and more like a company to invest in! [roll] Title: Re: Snapchat Post by: kopfjäger on August 11, 2017, 09:25:08 AM [laugh]
Title: Re: Snapchat Post by: Drjones on November 14, 2018, 04:37:23 AM Oh Snap!
The DOJ and SEC have subpoenaed Snap (NYSE:SNAP) for information about its March 2017 initial public offering, and the company said it is responding to the requests. The federal inquiries follow an ongoing shareholder lawsuit in which investors allege that Snap misled the public about how competition from Facebook (NASDAQ:FB) Instagram service had affected the company’s growth. That was a good short trade. Title: Re: Snapchat Post by: herm on November 14, 2018, 05:35:19 AM The "in the know" teeenagers stopped using snapchat 6 months ago.
Company is doomed.... |