Ducati Monster Forum

powered by:

February 24, 2025, 06:14:12 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Tapatalk users...click me
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  



Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Best high flow filter for 696/796/1100  (Read 31681 times)
Raux
Guest
« Reply #90 on: September 11, 2011, 10:44:50 AM »

although it still turns the air the 90 deg from the side intakes

Logged
mattfwalters
New Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 15


« Reply #91 on: September 12, 2011, 07:43:02 PM »

Yup, it's definitely the best of the intake kits that retains the stock air box.

I also tried to reinstall the stock air box lid when I installed mine, instructions (which I didn't read 'til after) never made any mention of it.


I did exactly the same thing. Bike was running pig-rich with the Termi ECU until I pulled the cover off, but I'm really impressed at the difference it makes over stock, that's for sure.
Logged
asherrick
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 216


« Reply #92 on: October 23, 2011, 03:42:35 PM »

Thanks, guys! I shipped my ECU out to Anthony for reflashing today and ordered the MWR filter. Unfortunately it's backordered, so I'm not sure how long my bike will be down.  Cry

I finally got around to installing my MWR filter today. I've been running a flashed ECU with the stock filter and exhaust in the mean time. Ironically, it still ran way better than stock. With the MWR filter installed the bike pulls a bit harder and the throttle response is quicker. You can also hear the engine breathing at idle. You also get more engine noise which sounds pretty nice at WOT. Overall, a solid upgrade!
Logged

'09 M1100s
metroplex
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 300



« Reply #93 on: January 29, 2013, 11:58:45 AM »

I looked at the dyno graphs and the 1-2 hp/ft-lb gains don't indicate the stock airbox/filter is that restrictive? I understand 1-2 hp can be "a lot" when talking about a 696 cc engine, but 1-2 hp could be dyno error as well?
Logged

These aren't the droids you're looking for
koko64
Post Whore
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 15746


« Reply #94 on: February 01, 2013, 01:16:08 PM »


the amount of air an engine sucks in per cycle is limited. question is ... is the stock airbox larger than that volume?

and finally, the MWR has a least one advantage I see, reducing the amount of turbulence around the intake horns.
I hate how close the stock filter sits to the intake horns. that cannot help air flow during an intake cycle even it's a K&N filter.

so... as long as the MWR is allowing enough air into the airbox based on flow and surface area, then it should have an advantage. If the surface area isn't sufficient then it may actually limit the airflow

Very interesting.
The MWR set up attempts to create some space between the filter and intake stacks/horns, so they have tried to address the problem. I wonder if there was a way of affixing a panel filter at the very top of the airbox?
Logged

2015 Scrambler 800
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.1.1