Suspension Question: Upgrade or No Upgrade?

[DSH]

My ride: '97 750, I'm the 2nd owner
Current Suspension: stock and needs servicing

I intend on touring with this bike only and not taking it to the track.  I'm debating between upgrading the suspension w/ new springs and valves or just changing the fork oil.  The bike needs TLC in other departments and curious what your thoughts are re: upgrading the suspension vs just changing the oil.  The difference in price is nearly $300 and think I could apply the difference to service other items on the bike.

Would appreciate your feedback, Thanks everyone in advance.

[scott_araujo]

Changing the oil takes an afternoon and only costs about $20.  Do it and see how it feels.  If it's not good enough you know you need to do more. 

Scott

[Langanobob]

^ +1.   

[hypurone]

I agree for the most part with the replies already made. BUT. You said touring, does that mean touring bags and such? With the added weight, road conditions and current wear/tear levels on the suspension as it is, upgrading is almost a necessity... just my .02.

[Armor]

A new rear shock and spring will make the most difference.

[scott_araujo]

+1 on that but if you do the work yourself you can get front springs and oil for about $150 total.  I hated the divey front end and this was a lot of bang for the buck.  You're not too likely to find a decent shock for that much.

Scott

[dlearl476]

What is your weight?  AFAIK, most European bikes are suspended from the factory with ~175lb riders in mind.  If you're much above that, like most of us are, you'll benefit from mods.  IMO, the "real world" benefit from a properly suspended bike is one that is more comfortable, and safer, to ride.  That has a huge payoff especially in a "touring" application.