Ducati Monster Forum

powered by:

February 05, 2025, 11:49:29 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Please Help
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  



Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: thoughts on the 1199  (Read 2145 times)
xcaptainxbloodx
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 954


« on: May 20, 2012, 11:14:24 PM »

so now that its out and around, I thought id put my opinion out there as well as see what anyone else that has ridden one thought about it.

the 1199 is preeetttyyy make the beast with two backsing amazing.

theyve somehow managed to maintain an aggressive riding position while making it more comfortable than any other comparable bike ive ridden (and thus made a bike that's really easy to ride and very confidence inspiring.)

the power delivery is something else, feels like an 848evo until like 6.5-7k rpm and then it pulls like a goddamn freight train. quick shift is phenomenal, as is all of the electronic assists (the LED headlights and LCD cluster look and function spectacularly as well ).

I can think of only two negatives, is one aesthetic twinge with how the electronic TTX looks. the other is one assumption that this bike will not crash well. all the ECU's are mounted on the sides near the air intakes, the tank is aluminum,the ttx is fully exposed, the base model has very awesome aluminum tubes, and the engine has no frame and very flexible plastics to protect it. I imagine  the chances of picking up a cosmetically totaled 1199 to turn into a track bike are pretty damn slim.  although, it may be a wash as the airbox/forward subframe is only something like 1500$.

between this, the 848 streetfighter, the chromo diavel and the rumors about that 848 multistrada/hyper/whatever, I think the line up is looking really damn good.


I was also thinking... because of how the new motor is built, many of the components could not be duplicated on a smaller displacement version (yet).  maybe this will force the return of the supermono?
Logged
Raux
Guest
« Reply #1 on: May 20, 2012, 11:41:11 PM »

the other is one assumption that this bike will not crash well. all the ECU's are mounted on the sides near the air intakes, the tank is aluminum,the ttx is fully exposed, the base model has very awesome aluminum tubes, and the engine has no frame and very flexible plastics to protect it. I imagine  the chances of picking up a cosmetically totaled 1199 to turn into a track bike are pretty damn slim.  although, it may be a wash as the airbox/forward subframe is only something like 1500$.

not really an assumption



http://www.european-motorcycle-diaries.com/2012/04/ducati-1199-panigale-crashes.html
Logged
krolik
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4251


Yeah, that's me. So what.


WWW
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2012, 06:51:09 AM »

Ouch. Cry
Logged

'03 M800 "not so dark" Dark, Remus high pipes, Cycle Cat clipons & frame sliders, CRG lanesplitter mirrors, Sargent seat, tail chop, Nichols flywheel, modified & powdercoated rearsets, 15/44 gearing, 520 chain & sprockets, TPO Beast pod filters, Power Comander III. 72.95 Rear Wheel HP & 54.29 ft-lbs!

Quote from: SacDuc
No. I'm a different type of idiot altogether.
OT
Still Sweeping.....
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1101


'04 M1000 Janis - smartly dressed in red


« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2012, 07:32:28 AM »

All part of the new energy-absorbing design.....
Logged
Triple J
Guest
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2012, 07:33:35 AM »


There isn't a bike made that would have survived that crash. Just sayin'
Logged
krolik
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4251


Yeah, that's me. So what.


WWW
« Reply #5 on: May 21, 2012, 08:26:18 AM »

That'll buff right out.
Logged

'03 M800 "not so dark" Dark, Remus high pipes, Cycle Cat clipons & frame sliders, CRG lanesplitter mirrors, Sargent seat, tail chop, Nichols flywheel, modified & powdercoated rearsets, 15/44 gearing, 520 chain & sprockets, TPO Beast pod filters, Power Comander III. 72.95 Rear Wheel HP & 54.29 ft-lbs!

Quote from: SacDuc
No. I'm a different type of idiot altogether.
Raux
Guest
« Reply #6 on: May 21, 2012, 08:39:18 AM »

The question is would a different bike torn otself aart like that causing the tumble in the first. place.  chicken and the egg. did the bike obliterate causing the catastrophic tumble or did the tumble tear apart the bike

I'm kinda thinking the former

Logged
thought
Everyone needs a
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2366



« Reply #7 on: May 21, 2012, 08:41:29 AM »

There isn't a bike made that would have survived that crash. Just sayin'

Yeah... with or without a frame the only thing you could have salvaged from that kind of crash would have been engine parts anyway.
Logged

'10 SFS 1098
'11 M796 ABS - Sold
'05 SV650N - Sold
Triple J
Guest
« Reply #8 on: May 21, 2012, 08:55:02 AM »

The question is would a different bike torn otself aart like that causing the tumble in the first. place.  chicken and the egg. did the bike obliterate causing the catastrophic tumble or did the tumble tear apart the bike

I'm kinda thinking the former

The bike didn't tumble because it tore itself apart, it tumbled because something (clip-on, footpeg, etc) caught in the ground causing it to tumble. It happens to all bikes, especially when they go down at high rates of speed.

As an example, I was corner working at a local race last year when a guy on an R6 went down at around 120 mph (turn 1, which is like a jog, at the end of the straight). He lost the front after stabbing the brakes when a guy cut in front of him. It was a wet race. Even though the track and grass were wet and very slippery, his R6 tumbled. There wasn't a damn thing left on his bike...even the rear wheel had a huge chunk missing from it. It happens.

I'm not convinced the 1199 will crash well, mainly due to the exposed rear shock, but your example wouldn't have mattered what bike it was.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.1.1