powered by:
January 26, 2025, 02:20:35 PM
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News
:
Tapatalk users...click me
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
Discussion Boards
Introduce Yourself
FAQs and Policies
General Monster Forum
Remembering our friends...in Memorium
Riding Techniques
Tutorials
Tech
Accessories & Mods
Gear
Racing & Trackdays
Stolen Motorcycles
No Moto Content
Board Tech Issues
Local Club Boards
BOMb
RCP
Sponsors
Valley Desmo Service
California Cycleworks
MotorcycleGear.Com
Monsterparts
Minor Sponsor Board
Sponsor Info
Flea Market
Monsters for Sale
Monsters Wanted
Other Bikes
Parts for Sale
Parts Wanted
Gear for Sale
Misc for Sale/Wanted
Ducati Monster Forum
>
Moto Board
>
Accessories & Mods
(Moderators:
Drunken Monkey
,
mitt
) >
Marving vs Sparks midpipes
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
Go Down
« previous
next »
Print
Author
Topic: Marving vs Sparks midpipes (Read 10175 times)
doulos
New Member
Offline
Posts: 40
Re: Marving vs Sparks midpipes
«
Reply #15 on:
January 17, 2009, 06:54:41 PM »
+3 or is it 4, for the Spark midpipe. Love the fit, finish, sound, install and quality.
PAV: no problems, no changes needed to add a midpipe to your bike.
According to my mechanic the S2R 800's have plenty of adjustment range, w/o an ECU change.
Logged
DarkStaR
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1959
Re: Marving vs Sparks midpipes
«
Reply #16 on:
January 17, 2009, 07:26:03 PM »
Quote from: RB on January 16, 2009, 05:55:50 AM
If i were to do it again i would purchase the Marving. Shown above is the Spark and in my opinion it hangs too low, meaning, look at the gap between the engine and the horizontal pipe. I was told this is normal, the Marving seems to fit closer to the engine, which i like. Don't get me wrong, the Spark had NO fitment problems and went in without any cussing.
...
RB
I have the spark mid-pipe also. I also noticed it seems to hang a bit low, but with a bellypan, it's not as noticeable.
«
Last Edit: January 17, 2009, 07:30:27 PM by DarkStaR
»
Logged
2CardDuc
New Member
Offline
Posts: 46
Il Mostro S4R
Re: Marving vs Sparks midpipes
«
Reply #17 on:
January 18, 2009, 04:58:29 AM »
Can’t say enough about Spark’s fit & finish.
10K on mine and still get compliments from fellow Ducatistas. Worth the wait & extra cash IMO.
Logged
psycledelic
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1290
Re: Marving vs Sparks midpipes
«
Reply #18 on:
January 18, 2009, 05:50:30 AM »
Quote from: PAV on January 17, 2009, 06:39:22 AM
I have an S2r 800 and really want to get rid of the udder. Some poeple have said that replacing it with a mid pipe will cause the bike to run too lean and that a Power Commander will be needed to properly adjust the mix. Have others here found this to be true? I hate the udder and would take it off in a sec but i'm getting conflicting info which has caused me to hesitate. Any ideas?
Well, I bought my Termis and DP midpipes without any ECU upgrade from Ducati. It was about $400 cheaper then the full set with ECU. I don't know much about it, but I know that the system with ECU and the system without ECU are on consecutive pages on the DP catalog (the parts guy and I were going back and forth). As far as I know, they didn't have to make any mixture adjustments. I didn't expect many HP's. I wanted the looks and sound. Couldn't tell you about the power gain because I also had a 14t front sprocket installed and the bike rode completely different. In my opinion, they are one of the best looking set of midpipes. They also replace the headers as well as the mids and udder. They bolt up to the motor. Here is what the midpipes look like.
Logged
06 S2R800 - the wife
04 999s - the mistress
PAV
New Member
Offline
Posts: 15
Re: Marving vs Sparks midpipes
«
Reply #19 on:
January 18, 2009, 05:35:38 PM »
Thanks to everyone for their input.
Logged
Mojo S2R
Wearing a cape offline so that others know I am a
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2488
. Dark Mojo .
Re: Marving vs Sparks midpipes
«
Reply #20 on:
January 18, 2009, 06:38:14 PM »
Hey, that's my line
Logged
My bike so far...
|
My desktop/wallpaper
|
CCMHA Map
|
Central Cal Monsters
q monster
Jr. Member
Offline
Posts: 52
Re: Marving vs Sparks midpipes
«
Reply #21 on:
January 19, 2009, 05:52:43 AM »
go for sparks - got mine at desmoworks. best online price for me in australia. but add the DP ECU, open airbox and retune!
Logged
q monster
2008 S2R1000 changed - spark headers and tail cut done, rizoma grips indicator lights and clutch cover titax levers, DP ECU, open filter, ...... maybe stop then............. nah think i'll add rizoma rearsets and their conical handlebar is f..hot... and then i need to get rid of those mirrors....
trpletme
Jr. Member
Offline
Posts: 61
Re: Marving vs Sparks midpipes
«
Reply #22 on:
June 23, 2009, 07:54:39 AM »
Does the Marving pipe interfere with the oil filter on an S2R 1000?
Logged
yotogi
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 774
Re: Marving vs Sparks midpipes
«
Reply #23 on:
June 23, 2009, 10:38:57 AM »
Quote from: trpletme on June 23, 2009, 07:54:39 AM
Does the Marving pipe interfere with the oil filter on an S2R 1000?
I don't think that either have clearance issues with the oil filter.
While you may or may not have any issues related to fueling when you start to open up your intake or exhaust system, be prepared to have them. The monsters run lean out of the box and opening up the exhaust exacerbates it. There is a Closed-Loop sticky in the Accessories and Mods section that is good reading for any owner of a Closed-Loop Monster, but is a must read (IMO) for owners messing with exhaust.
The short version is you don't have to solve the problem yourself as a FatDuc O2 manipulator makes all the lean condition go away for only $80. Hell, a bike without mods would run better with one installed.
Logged
rockaduc
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1045
Re: Marving vs Sparks midpipes
«
Reply #24 on:
June 23, 2009, 12:32:18 PM »
Quote from: stopintime on January 16, 2009, 02:16:15 AM
They both have crossovers - says so on MonsterParts website. Some models with, and some without provision for O2 sensors.
I have the Spark on my S2R800 '07 and I'm more than happy, much more. I got them to get rid of the udder, for looks only. People told me not to expect any improvement in sound or performance - they were VERY wrong about sound, and they might have been wrong about performance also. If my sound with open airbox/ECU/Termi cans was a 6 - then the sound with the midpipes is an 8. I guess S4R with the full system is 10.
My dealer installed mine. He usually installs the Termi pipes, but he said he never put on any brand of pipes so fast and with NO issues. No problems fitting them and no leaks - on his first attempt - usually takes some trial and error to get it right.
He adjusted the bike to run a little richer, I think that means it flows more air
- maybe therefore a performance gain (not always so, but in my case it seems to be more willing to be flogged)
When I did my research, I wasn't able to find any important differences between the two brands. I chose Sparks for price and availability, never regretted it.
And yes, I got mine from MonsterParts
FYI, Richer means more fuel, leaner means too much air
Logged
If you can see Chuck Norris, he can see you. If you can't see Chuck Norris, you may be only seconds away from death.
stopintime
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 9059
S2R 800 '07
Re: Marving vs Sparks midpipes
«
Reply #25 on:
June 23, 2009, 01:28:41 PM »
Quote from: rockaduc on June 23, 2009, 12:32:18 PM
FYI, Richer means more fuel, leaner means too much air
Yes, I know. That is my understanding as well.
What I was trying to say (English is my second language) was that since more fuel (richer) was required, it would have to mean that with midpipes the systems flows more air. Before and after considerations.
I hope You and I corrected any misunderstandings - thanks for helping
Logged
252,000 km/seventeen years - loving it
trpletme
Jr. Member
Offline
Posts: 61
Re: Marving vs Sparks midpipes
«
Reply #26 on:
June 23, 2009, 08:40:32 PM »
How about the oil drain plug? I know.. Dumb ? Great pics of the Sparks mid. Thanks!
Logged
rockaduc
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1045
Re: Marving vs Sparks midpipes
«
Reply #27 on:
June 24, 2009, 12:12:12 AM »
Dunno about the other brands, (i would imagine they are similar) but the DP mid-pipes allow you to access everything w/o too much of a problem.
Yes, I know. That is my understanding as well.
What I was trying to say (English is my second language) was that since more fuel (richer) was required, it would have to mean that with midpipes the systems flows more air. Before and after considerations.
I hope You and I corrected any misunderstandings - thanks for helping
«
Last Edit: June 24, 2009, 12:26:13 AM by rockaduc
»
Logged
If you can see Chuck Norris, he can see you. If you can't see Chuck Norris, you may be only seconds away from death.
AndrewNS
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 106
Re: Marving vs Sparks midpipes
«
Reply #28 on:
June 25, 2009, 04:17:11 AM »
This is the spark mid-pipe on my S2R1000, and there aren't any clearance problems.
«
Last Edit: June 25, 2009, 04:20:27 AM by AndrewNS
»
Logged
trpletme
Jr. Member
Offline
Posts: 61
Re: Marving vs Sparks midpipes
«
Reply #29 on:
June 25, 2009, 05:15:19 AM »
Great pic! Pipe looks great also. Thanks.
Logged
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
Go Up
Print
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Introductions
-----------------------------
=> Introduce Yourself
=> FAQs and Board Policies
-----------------------------
Moto Board
-----------------------------
=> General Monster Forum
=> In Memorium...Remembering our Friends
=> Riding Techniques
=> Tutorials
=> Tech
=> Accessories & Mods
=> Gear
=> Racing & Trackdays
=> Stolen Motorcycles
=> Random Cool Pics
-----------------------------
Kitchen Sink
-----------------------------
=> No Moto Content
===> Board Suggestions
===> Fixed Board Issues
=> Stella's Pop
-----------------------------
DMF Sponsors
-----------------------------
=> Valley Desmo Service
=> Ca-Cycleworks
=> New Enough.Com
=> Monsterparts
=> Minor Sponsors
=> Misc Info
-----------------------------
Local Clubs
-----------------------------
=> Monster Women
=> Ducati MOB
=> SoCal Monsters
=> CAM
=> OZ monsters
=> NorthWest
=> NEMHA
=> NYMMC
=> MHM
=> SoCO DOG
=> DFWM
=> MADDOG
=> MOCHA
=> THCM
=> AZDRA
=> M-ROC
=> Central Cal Monsters
=> DOCSF
=> MCMC
=> DDCM
=> DOCTOR
=> Hoosier Hooligans
=> OMHA
=> DOCIA
=> Rising Sun Ducatis
=> MCM
=> NMMR
=> MIA
=> Desmotropic
=> COW
=> MOTH
=> DesmOK
=> Bayou Country Ducati Riders
=> DeVal Mostro
=> Coastal Ducati Club
-----------------------------
Configurators and Calculators
-----------------------------
=> Valve Shim Calculator
Loading...
SimplePortal 2.1.1