Ducati Monster Forum

powered by:

February 05, 2025, 12:52:30 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Tapatalk users...click me
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  



Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Powercommander V vs Two Brothers Juice Box vs ???  (Read 9742 times)
zippo
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 51



« Reply #30 on: August 06, 2009, 10:12:51 AM »

not me, since the stock air filter is already 'high flow'
-considering that (1) it's the same filetr they use on ducati engines nearly twice the size of a 696.  and
(2) the 696 doesn't rev very high to start with.

 i did Dyno my 696 with the juice box set at the factory settings with slip-ons, ..basically showed it was just a tad rich.
there's more than enough adjustment range to accommodate any air filter change  (which would make it run lean, if anything at all)
Logged
1313
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 441


« Reply #31 on: August 06, 2009, 10:20:58 AM »

Thanks for the info.
Logged

09 M696
DoWorkSon
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 458



« Reply #32 on: August 06, 2009, 02:01:26 PM »

I am running the juice box with slipons and a K&N "high flow" air filter... I have the juice box set a little high and its running a tad bit rich... The bike is smoother throughout the powerband, but I get a little bogging on quick acceleration... Still trying to adjust through the butt dyno, but for the most part, it works great.... Adjusting it is as easy as removing the seat, hitting a button, and then putting seat back on...

Logged

2003 BMW R1150GS- The commuter
2009 M696--SOLD
zippo
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 51



« Reply #33 on: August 06, 2009, 02:12:21 PM »

from my dyno test, i'd say you're more likely too RICH to start with, rather than needing to re-set the box to a richer setting..
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.1.1