Ducati Monster Forum

powered by:

January 10, 2025, 10:25:07 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Please Help
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  



Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: sprocket change M900  (Read 5026 times)
lwszabo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 748


« on: May 30, 2009, 01:39:05 PM »

I was thinking of dropping a tooth in the front, or adding 2 in the back. I took my bike in for service, and the guy said I had a 41 in the back...it think stock it 39 right??? If I still dropped 1 in the front would it be a drastic change? are there any negatives to this?
Logged
Duck-Stew
Local Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9559


« Reply #1 on: May 30, 2009, 04:46:39 PM »

There are some who feel the 14T fronts are a little too tight in radius for the 520 chain and that the gearing changes should occur on the rear sprocket only.  Personally?!?  The 14T front *may* shorten the life of the chain a bit...but hey, there's a cost for everything you do, so...

If you're running 15/41 right now then you may want to try 15/43 or 15/44 even...  It's all personal preference really.  I'm going to be changing my '95 M900 from 15/39 to 15/38 next week.
Logged

Bike-less Portuguese immigrant enjoying life.
greenmonster
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1289


« Reply #2 on: May 30, 2009, 05:07:29 PM »

Carb stock is 15/39, ie 15/38.
Logged

M900 -97 
MTS 1100s  -07
dlearl476
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 686



« Reply #3 on: May 30, 2009, 07:00:23 PM »

are there any negatives to this?

What is your goal?  I went from a 41t rear to a 39t rear because I couldn't ride my '99 M900 in a parking garage without constantly feathering the clutch.  39t is just about right.  IIRC, with a 44, you'd be doing about 25 mph at idle, are you sure that's what you want?  It would lower your RPM at cruise, but IMO it may be difficult at slow speeds.
Logged
Howie
Post Whore
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 17303



« Reply #4 on: May 30, 2009, 07:14:18 PM »

What is your goal?  I went from a 41t rear to a 39t rear because I couldn't ride my '99 M900 in a parking garage without constantly feathering the clutch.  39t is just about right.  IIRC, with a 44, you'd be doing about 25 mph at idle, are you sure that's what you want?  It would lower your RPM at cruise, but IMO it may be difficult at slow speeds.

 Huh?
Logged
lowendmonster
New Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 4


« Reply #5 on: May 30, 2009, 09:20:33 PM »

39 tooth is stock.

I went to 42.

Dump the clutch and hold on.
Logged
BumpaD_Z28
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 159



« Reply #6 on: May 30, 2009, 09:26:11 PM »

I run 15/41 on my '99 M900 ...

I originally tried 14/41 and although GREAT around town / canyons I felt that it was too low geared for the freeway runs ...

~DaVe
Logged

Dave & Jen Hoppie
1971 Suzuki TS125'R'
1999 DUCATI MONSTER M900 CITY w/Mobil 1 Racing 4T 10W-40
Porsche Monkey
JuddDdd likes my
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2907


The DMFer formerly known as Ducaholic


« Reply #7 on: May 31, 2009, 09:06:43 AM »

What is your goal?  I went from a 41t rear to a 39t rear because I couldn't ride my '99 M900 in a parking garage without constantly feathering the clutch.  39t is just about right.  IIRC, with a 44, you'd be doing about 25 mph at idle, are you sure that's what you want?  It would lower your RPM at cruise, but IMO it may be difficult at slow speeds.


Think you got it backwards there buddy.
Logged

if I had a vagina...I'd never leave the house

Duck-Stew
Local Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9559


« Reply #8 on: May 31, 2009, 07:23:06 PM »


Think you got it backwards there buddy.

+1

Carb stock is 15/39, ie 15/38.

I know that in the US a 1999 M900 was 15/38 as stock because my M750 was mis-geared at the factory.  It should've been 15/40 but was 15/38...
Logged

Bike-less Portuguese immigrant enjoying life.
dlearl476
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 686



« Reply #9 on: May 31, 2009, 08:21:02 PM »


Think you got it backwards there buddy.

Thats what I get for posting at work with people talking to me.  waytogo
Logged
lwszabo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 748


« Reply #10 on: June 01, 2009, 04:57:34 AM »

What is your goal?  I went from a 41t rear to a 39t rear because I couldn't ride my '99 M900 in a parking garage without constantly feathering the clutch.  39t is just about right.  IIRC, with a 44, you'd be doing about 25 mph at idle, are you sure that's what you want?  It would lower your RPM at cruise, but IMO it may be difficult at slow speeds.
I think you are a little backwards, but I understand what you are trying to get at. My goal is to make the bike more rideable down low, but i just found out my bike was running very, very rich, to the point it almost quit running....so its in for new plugs, re-jetted, belts, etc......so Maybe the gearing will be perfect!!! waytogo
Logged
ab
ab
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1489


ab


WWW
« Reply #11 on: June 01, 2009, 08:27:14 PM »

I have question along same lines and get confirmation.  I just ordered chains/sprocket (14/46 and 520 - my current settings) but am thinking to send back the sprocket and get back to stock due to the rubbing chain issue(DMF thread explained the chain rubbing noise could be because of the front sprocket) .  Is stock setting for 620 15/46 ?  The bike has been dyno and setup with 14/46.  If I go back to stock, would I have to get the pc commander mappings and the other engine work dyno again and optimized?
« Last Edit: June 01, 2009, 08:34:27 PM by ab » Logged

620M 2004 Dark i.e.; ~ 57K miles (all me);  Looking to swap out engine now.
Triumph Speed Triple 2006 (now ~ 44K miles bought @ 4K miles on 04/2010)
Honda Grom 2015 ~ 3500miles so far.  Love this lil bike
erkishhorde
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2962



« Reply #12 on: June 01, 2009, 09:46:37 PM »

I have question along same lines and get confirmation.  I just ordered chains/sprocket (14/46 and 520 - my current settings) but am thinking to send back the sprocket and get back to stock due to the rubbing chain issue(DMF thread explained the chain rubbing noise could be because of the front sprocket) .  Is stock setting for 620 15/46 ?  The bike has been dyno and setup with 14/46.  If I go back to stock, would I have to get the pc commander mappings and the other engine work dyno again and optimized?

I really don't know much about dynos but...
While sprockets will affect the dyno readouts, the bike doesn't need to be dyno'ed again after sprockets are changed. Changing sprockets should shift the entire dyno chart up/down depending on what you do but getting the bike dyno'ed is used to change fuel/air mixture settings to smooth out curves and whatnot to get better engine performance.

If your 620 is '05+ I think your stock setting was 15/48 and if it was pre-05 it was likely close to 15/46. I got those numbers from the CA-cycleworks site.
Logged

ErkZ NOT in SLO w/ his '95 m900!
The end is in sight! Gotta buckle down and get to work!
GAAN
Guest
« Reply #13 on: June 02, 2009, 01:35:27 AM »

you are right

5 speed 620 stock ratio is 15/46

6 speed 620 stock ratio is 15/48
Logged
Teutonics
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 187


'02 900ie


« Reply #14 on: June 02, 2009, 05:47:07 PM »

I was thinking of dropping a tooth in the front, or adding 2 in the back.
14/41 here and loving it. 

However, I do very little highway/slab riding, although have done some and didn't think the gearing was excessively low for moderate (80ish) highway speeds.  Changing back to 15/41 takes just a couple of minutes if I knew I was going to do some long distances.
Logged

Atlanta, GA - 2002 M900ie
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.1.1