Fox should stick to Nascar

[DanTheMan]

Will everyone quit whining about the horrible tv coverage!?!? Just sign up for motogp.com and forget about it.

He'll ill even pay for a subscription is you stop whining. 

 

[derby]

He'll ill even pay for a subscription is you stop whining. 

will you pay to upgrade mine to hi-res? 

[DanTheMan]

will you pay to upgrade mine to hi-res? 

so you admit your whining? 

[bdfinally]

Wan't that the normal GreedTV crew? I dropped Greed after Daytona when I saw their schedule for covering the remaining races...after 4 years I gave up. Now I catch the Eurosport coverage of FP1 & qualifing and BBC coverage of the races...it's night and day boys.

[Cider]

Will everyone quit whining about the horrible tv coverage!?!? Just sign up for motogp.com and forget about it.

He'll ill even pay for a subscription is you stop whining. 

Fox uses public airwaves.  They have a duty to provide excellent GP coverage in return!

Sign me up for one of those whiner subscriptions, please.

[kopfjäger]

Will everyone quit whining about the horrible tv coverage!?!? Just sign up for motogp.com and forget about it.

He'll ill even pay for a subscription is you stop whining. 




 

I told them that in my first post but, they just love to pregnant dog and moan. 

[DanTheMan]

I told them that in my first post but, they just love to pregnant dog and moan. 

I just wanted to pregnant dog about them pregnant doging 

[superjohn]

Will everyone quit whining about the horrible tv coverage!?!? Just sign up for motogp.com and forget about it.

He'll ill even pay for a subscription is you stop whining. 

 

Does the Motogp.com coverage look like youtube, or does it look like the HD trailers off iTunes? If the video is good, then how's the buffering time?

I'm with you about the pregnant doging, since no one really cares, but I'm not so sold on paying for web coverage since 99% of web video looks like ass or takes too long to load and is constantly rebuffering.

[Jester]

I never have issues with gp.com buffering.  It takes a few secs to get goin, then its solid all the way through.  I'm running the hi-def package atm.  The video isn't flawless, but its pretty good.

[Triple J]

How fast of a connection do you need for the GP subscription?

I have DSL, but it's not the fastest because it isn't available in my area.

[gm2]

keep in mind that the motogp.com high end package is specifically called "high-res", not HD.  it's not HD; it's just larger format standard def.

i didn't buy the package this year but i had it the two years prior and thought it was well worth the $.

[mitt]

they are having 1/2 price now for the package.

mitt

[DanTheMan]

For the money its worth it, you get to see all the special interviews, action clips, full races with no comercials, 125 and 250. The quality is good enough, you can watch it full screen and know whats going on, sometimes its difficult to make out the names and times across the bottom of the screen.

[zooom]

okay...here is my wine about paying for MotoGP coverage...

if I am going to pay to watch racing, I want to watch actual good racing and quite frankly, for the most part with MotoGP, you just don't seem to get that. For what MotoGP.com wants a year, it just doesn't add up to me. If I were offered the exact same coverage in a package like what they do for say the WSBK product, I'd be all over it in a heartbeat, because that has a value that is commensurate with what I want to see!

[gm2]

is that a pinot or a cab?