Ducati Monster Forum

powered by:

February 06, 2025, 10:52:02 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: No Registration with MSN emails
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  



Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 1959 Chevy Bel Air VS 2009 Chevy Malibu  (Read 7651 times)
Monster Dave
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4550


« Reply #15 on: September 16, 2009, 01:03:27 PM »

anyone else notice the IZ_ dice in the '59? At least the driveer would have been cool when he died.

That's funny, I hadn't noticed that! LOL!
Logged
Oldfisti
Some call it a sub, dagwood, hoagie or footlong. I just call it my...
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5622


My mom says I'm a catch.


« Reply #16 on: September 16, 2009, 05:52:52 PM »

More footage with interior shots...


1959 Chevrolet Bel Air Vs. 2009 Chevrolet Malibu IIHS Offset (New Footage - Interior Views)
Logged

It's like I keep saying:  Those who would sacrifice a free range session for a giant beer, deserve neither free range time nor a giant beer.
i have had guys reach back and grab my crotch in an attempt to get around me. i'll either blow in their ear or ask them politely to let go of my wang.
Howie
Post Whore
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 17348



« Reply #17 on: September 16, 2009, 06:06:19 PM »

The important question is did the IZ_ dice survive Tongue  I am not surprised by that video one bit.
Logged
Oldfisti
Some call it a sub, dagwood, hoagie or footlong. I just call it my...
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5622


My mom says I'm a catch.


« Reply #18 on: September 16, 2009, 06:13:33 PM »

You know what, I think they did!
Logged

It's like I keep saying:  Those who would sacrifice a free range session for a giant beer, deserve neither free range time nor a giant beer.
i have had guys reach back and grab my crotch in an attempt to get around me. i'll either blow in their ear or ask them politely to let go of my wang.
NAKID
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8847



« Reply #19 on: September 16, 2009, 06:26:26 PM »

It says at the end of the video that the Malibu driver would have had a slight knee injury, but the driver of the Bel Air would have died instantly.
In the first 30 seconds or so, it confirms Randy's thought that is was a combined 80mph offset crash, both vehicles traveling at 40mph...
Logged

2005 S2R800
2006 S2R1000
2015 Monster 821
Ddan
Some of my best friends are whores
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9084



« Reply #20 on: September 17, 2009, 01:25:35 AM »

Me thinks this may be more of a set-up than it appears. The GM X-frame cars were apparently well known to fare badly in a crash, and you can pretty clearly see the cloud of rust dust at impact.  I wonder what kind of shape the Bel Air was in prior to the test. 
Logged

2000 Monster 900Sie, a few changes
1992 900 SS, currently a pile of parts.  Now running
                    flogged successfully  NHMS  12 customized.  Twice.   T3 too.   Now retired.
 
Ducati Monster Forum at
www.ducatimonsterforum.org
mitt
Flounder-Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4378


2003 M1000s


WWW
« Reply #21 on: September 17, 2009, 06:07:09 AM »

Me thinks this may be more of a set-up than it appears. The GM X-frame cars were apparently well known to fare badly in a crash, and you can pretty clearly see the cloud of rust dust at impact.  I wonder what kind of shape the Bel Air was in prior to the test. 

So, should they build a brand new 1959 for the test?  Accelerate age a 2009 to 59 condition in a salt chamber? Or argue that today's cars are less safe? 

It was probably intended as a cool video, not a proof of a theorem. 

mitt
Logged

Langanobob
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1124


« Reply #22 on: September 17, 2009, 06:13:33 AM »

Cars may be safer, but what about the other part of the equation, us drivers?  Somehow I don't think so.
Logged
NAKID
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8847



« Reply #23 on: September 17, 2009, 06:17:09 AM »

Cars may be safer, but what about the other part of the equation, us drivers?  Somehow I don't think so.

 I think you're right. In 1959, people in general had a higher respect for cars. And, not everyone had them...
Logged

2005 S2R800
2006 S2R1000
2015 Monster 821
ducatiz
No trellis. no desmo. = Not Ducati.
Post Whore
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 15591



« Reply #24 on: September 17, 2009, 06:26:08 AM »

Moreover, why isn't anyone outraged that a classic car has been trashed?

Seriously?  did we REALLY need this done to prove anything?  How many '59 models are still on the road at ALL?

Seems to me they could have used a 1970s car to "prove" cars are better, rather than trashing a genuine antique.
Logged

Check out my oil filter forensics thread!                     Offended? Click here
"Yelling out of cars, turning your speakers out the window to blast your music onto the street, setting off M-80 firecrackers, firing automatic weapons into the air—these are all well and good. But none of them create a merry atmosphere of insouciance and bonhomie quite like a revving motorcycle.
ducatiz
No trellis. no desmo. = Not Ducati.
Post Whore
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 15591



« Reply #25 on: September 17, 2009, 06:28:04 AM »

all this video proves to me is that we've done a great deal to prevent idiots from killing themselves (and yes, others) with cars.

Darwin hangs his head...
Logged

Check out my oil filter forensics thread!                     Offended? Click here
"Yelling out of cars, turning your speakers out the window to blast your music onto the street, setting off M-80 firecrackers, firing automatic weapons into the air—these are all well and good. But none of them create a merry atmosphere of insouciance and bonhomie quite like a revving motorcycle.
acalles
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 438


« Reply #26 on: September 17, 2009, 06:36:46 AM »

Me thinks this may be more of a set-up than it appears. The GM X-frame cars were apparently well known to fare badly in a crash, and you can pretty clearly see the cloud of rust dust at impact.  I wonder what kind of shape the Bel Air was in prior to the test. 

I think its probably not.

the point of the test is, to comparable cars, being sold to the same type of people (small family sedan) for roughly the same price (based on inflation) and at about the same weight.

It KILLS the old saying "they don't make them like they used to"

the test was used to demonstrate how much technology has made our lives better. I doubt some rust really made that big a difference, it was structurally insufficient from the start. Back in those days, no one ever thought about safety.

Cab on frame vehicles just aren't that safe to began with. Last year I was in a accident where a truck ran a light, we were in a small sturdy car (audi A4), they were in a truck (dual cab ranger) we were out and walking around, they were flipped over unconscious.  (granted my back still kills me, especially in the mornings)

Cars may be safer, but what about the other part of the equation, us drivers?  Somehow I don't think so.
 

people don't change.. might as well put them in a better box. remember, and alive customer is better then a dead one!
Logged
Monster Dave
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4550


« Reply #27 on: September 17, 2009, 07:34:27 AM »


Wow, those inside shots are awesome!!!
Logged
derby
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5267



« Reply #28 on: September 17, 2009, 07:42:59 AM »

Moreover, why isn't anyone outraged that a classic car has been trashed?

Seriously?  did we REALLY need this done to prove anything?  How many '59 models are still on the road at ALL?

Seems to me they could have used a 1970s car to "prove" cars are better, rather than trashing a genuine antique.

except it wouldn't have been a 50 year old difference in the cars' ages for the 50th anniversary.
Logged

-- derby

'07 Suz GSX-R750

Retired rides: '05 Duc Monster S4R, '99 Yam YZF-R1, '98 Hon CBR600F3, '97 Suz GSX-R750, '96 Hon CBR600F3, '94 Hon CBR600F2, '91 Hon Hawk GT, '91 Yam YSR-50, '87 Yam YSR-50

click here for info about my avatar
Langanobob
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1124


« Reply #29 on: September 17, 2009, 08:14:48 AM »

Quote
Moreover, why isn't anyone outraged that a classic car has been trashed?

As I recall it was a four-door.  No collectors value  Smiley  At least that's what I recall from the good ol' days - everybody wanted a two-door.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.1.1