Ducati Monster Forum

powered by:

December 27, 2024, 12:57:02 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Please Help
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  



Pages: 1 ... 17 18 [19] 20 21 ... 25   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 1000cc in 2012  (Read 78430 times)
gm2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5097


« Reply #270 on: March 09, 2012, 12:23:41 PM »

I thought the factories had been making the rules for the last few year? So all of the changes mentioned, with maybe the exception of the switch back to 1000cc, were the factory's decision.

yup.

Dorna did push the 800 idea, but it was the MSMA's doing.  Mainly Honda.
Logged

Like this is the racing, no?
gm2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5097


« Reply #271 on: March 09, 2012, 12:25:22 PM »

I agree. If he wants to run the manufacturers off he is doing a damn good job. bang head What will be left? A spec race bike class ala the universal NASCAR race car? Roll Eyes Zzzzzzzz...

Hey! When's the next WSBK race? popcorn Dolph

a spec ECU and rev limits do not equal a spec bike.  carmelo has said from the beginning that it will always be a prototype series.
Logged

Like this is the racing, no?
gm2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5097


« Reply #272 on: March 16, 2012, 05:08:05 AM »

last of the CRTs breaks cover.  it'll be slow, but it's nice to look at...

http://motomatters.com/news/2012/03/16/the_last_crt_bike_takes_to_the_track_pir.html

Logged

Like this is the racing, no?
gm2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5097


« Reply #273 on: March 16, 2012, 05:19:33 AM »

http://motomatters.com/interview/2012/03/15/honda_press_release_fausto_gresini_talks.html

and a good interview with fausto.  some about marco of course, but some choice brass tacks words about the state of MotoGP and his move to a CRT bike.
Logged

Like this is the racing, no?
gm2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5097


« Reply #274 on: March 19, 2012, 01:42:35 PM »

Nakamoto sounding pretty reasonable:

http://www.motomatters.com/interview/2012/03/17/shuhei_nakamoto_interview_on_crt_spec_ec.html

Logged

Like this is the racing, no?
duccarlos
Local Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7994



WWW
« Reply #275 on: March 19, 2012, 02:01:14 PM »

The ECU is where everyone will have issues and not because of cost. The reality is that a computer keeps these bikes from flying off the tracks. They can also get away with a ton of rule "bending" using the proprietary ECU. Of course, this is ultimately a prototype class and hence they should be able to "run what they brought".
Logged

my keyboard just served me with paternity suit.
derby
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5267



« Reply #276 on: March 19, 2012, 02:04:56 PM »

The ECU is where everyone will have issues and not because of cost. The reality is that a computer keeps these bikes from flying off the tracks. They can also get away with a ton of rule "bending" using the proprietary ECU. Of course, this is ultimately a prototype class and hence they should be able to "run what they brought".

yup... the spec-ECU totally destroyed formula 1.  Roll Eyes
Logged

-- derby

'07 Suz GSX-R750

Retired rides: '05 Duc Monster S4R, '99 Yam YZF-R1, '98 Hon CBR600F3, '97 Suz GSX-R750, '96 Hon CBR600F3, '94 Hon CBR600F2, '91 Hon Hawk GT, '91 Yam YSR-50, '87 Yam YSR-50

click here for info about my avatar
OT
Still Sweeping.....
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1101


'04 M1000 Janis - smartly dressed in red


« Reply #277 on: March 20, 2012, 08:23:20 AM »

This part (about CRT) does not bode well for our favorite red machines (assuming it's not gamesmanship)...

"But motorcycle is different. Aerodynamics is maybe less than 5% of machine performance. On a motorcycle, the most important thing is the chassis, the swingarm. To make a very good chassis, you need a lot of experience. For the constructor, they can make an average level of chassis, but I think it will be very difficult to make a competitive machine," he added.

So it would possible for a constructor to get to maybe 90% of the performance of a factory prototype, but the really difficult part, the final 10%, would only be possible for manufacturers?

"Yes," Nakamoto replied...."
« Last Edit: March 20, 2012, 08:25:41 AM by OT » Logged
duccarlos
Local Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7994



WWW
« Reply #278 on: March 20, 2012, 11:52:37 AM »

yup... the spec-ECU totally destroyed formula 1.  Roll Eyes

What's wrong with "run what you brought"? Isn't this a prototype class? If I wanted stock anything I would watch Nascar.
Logged

my keyboard just served me with paternity suit.
Speeddog
West Valley Flatlander
Flounder-Administrator
Post Whore
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14813


RIP Nicky


« Reply #279 on: March 20, 2012, 11:56:57 AM »

What's wrong with "run what you brought"? Isn't this a prototype class? If I wanted stock anything I would watch Nascar.

I think you're missing the point.

Continuation of the "run what you brought" will result in you watching NASCAR, as there'll be no more MotoGP.
Logged

- - - - - Valley Desmo Service - - - - -
Reseda, CA

(951) 640-8908


~~~ "We've rearranged the deck chairs, refilled the champagne glasses, and the band sounds great. This is fine." - Alberto Puig ~~~
gm2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5097


« Reply #280 on: March 20, 2012, 11:58:36 AM »

what's wrong with it is then there'll be 10 bikes on the grid.  then all three classes fail.

and how is a spec ECU stock?
Logged

Like this is the racing, no?
duccarlos
Local Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7994



WWW
« Reply #281 on: March 20, 2012, 12:06:28 PM »

Then don't call it a prototype class. I'm sure spec ECU will not impact at all, like spec tires didn't impact either  Roll Eyes
Logged

my keyboard just served me with paternity suit.
gm2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5097


« Reply #282 on: March 20, 2012, 12:11:33 PM »

does "spec" necessarily mean "not prototype" to you?
« Last Edit: March 20, 2012, 12:13:14 PM by gm2 » Logged

Like this is the racing, no?
duccarlos
Local Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7994



WWW
« Reply #283 on: March 20, 2012, 12:34:20 PM »

Spec means same as everyone else. Prototype for me means outside of the norms. Where does a prototype series turn into a spec series? Is it a prototype when you have just 1 aspect different from everyone else? What if they rode spec bikes to the last detail except for the engine? Would it still be a prototype? What if they only allowed engine and swingarm? Soon WSBK will be more prototype racing than MotoGP.
Logged

my keyboard just served me with paternity suit.
Raux
Guest
« Reply #284 on: March 20, 2012, 12:40:07 PM »

to me. prototype means

you have a set number for wheels, weight, and cc's

other rules help limit speeds like limits on amount of gas, electronic suspension or traction/wheelie control

spec means
bore size (this forces 4cyl), ecu, etc the same.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 17 18 [19] 20 21 ... 25   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.1.1