powered by:
February 23, 2025, 02:09:31 PM
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News
:
Welcome to the DMF
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
Discussion Boards
Introduce Yourself
FAQs and Policies
General Monster Forum
Remembering our friends...in Memorium
Riding Techniques
Tutorials
Tech
Accessories & Mods
Gear
Racing & Trackdays
Stolen Motorcycles
No Moto Content
Board Tech Issues
Local Club Boards
BOMb
RCP
Sponsors
Valley Desmo Service
California Cycleworks
MotorcycleGear.Com
Monsterparts
Minor Sponsor Board
Sponsor Info
Flea Market
Monsters for Sale
Monsters Wanted
Other Bikes
Parts for Sale
Parts Wanted
Gear for Sale
Misc for Sale/Wanted
Ducati Monster Forum
>
Moto Board
>
General Monster Forum
(Moderators:
ducpainter
,
bigiain
,
Speeddog
) >
Terblanche and others defend the VFR1200
Pages:
1
[
2
]
Go Down
« previous
next »
Print
Author
Topic: Terblanche and others defend the VFR1200 (Read 6609 times)
Bill in OKC
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 897
S4Rs
Re: Terblanche and others defend the VFR1200
«
Reply #15 on:
January 08, 2010, 11:38:46 AM »
The bike must be in trouble if it needs to be defended. I don't think that this is the bike long-time VFR owners were looking for.
Logged
'07 S4Rs '02 RSVR '75 GT550 '13 FXSB '74 H1E '71 CB750
sally101
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 328
Re: Terblanche and others defend the VFR1200
«
Reply #16 on:
January 08, 2010, 11:39:34 AM »
Quote from: bluemoco on January 08, 2010, 11:12:26 AM
It has a 4.9 gallon tank. Conservatively assuming the bike gets 40 mpg, that's about 160 miles before you're looking for fuel. (not too bad, IMO)
Generally, I like to get off a bike every 2 hours or so, so a range like this wouldn't be a deal-breaker for someone like me.
2 corrections.. The tank is actually 4.1 gallons and this dude was only getting 34mpg in his review:
http://ashonbikes.com/content/honda-vfr1200f
Now that's a deal-breaker for me..
(but I do think it looks great)
Logged
Sally101 <----- Still Not a Chick
07 S4Rs in "Candy Cane"
fastwin
Guest
Re: Terblanche and others defend the VFR1200
«
Reply #17 on:
January 08, 2010, 12:05:56 PM »
Kinda on topic, there are some great deals going on the leftover VFRs. I catch myself finding reasons to drive to the local Honda Powersports dealership just to oogle at the new '07 red/white/blue VFR. Makes me kick myself for not picking up the original red/white/blue '86 model when it came out. The older VFRs were good looking scooters and down right great bikes. Hopefully the new one will be well received. I am just not digging the style and looks. The humped back whale gas tank would make it hard to mount a conventional tank bag. That will be a deal killer for a lot of sport touring riders, me included. I'll stick to my sport touring Busa with it's long pointy nose and shitty handling.
At least it has a flat tank.
Logged
Scottish
Balls!
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2760
That's thinkin' with your dipstick Jimmy!
Re: Terblanche and others defend the VFR1200
«
Reply #18 on:
January 08, 2010, 12:43:38 PM »
Quote from: Travman on January 08, 2010, 11:23:58 AM
I'm pretty sure the B-King was not a sales success. It only lasted for one year. It is no longer being sold. I totally get your point though.
That is exactly my point, it was only sold for 2 years I think. So I can assume others fon't like their motorcycles to look like transformers either.
Logged
You can thank a soldier today, just click the link...
http://www.letssaythanks.com/Home1024.html
ducatiz
No trellis. no desmo. = Not Ducati.
Post Whore
Offline
Posts: 15591
Re: Terblanche and others defend the VFR1200
«
Reply #19 on:
January 08, 2010, 01:19:23 PM »
B-King
www.suzuki-bk.com
Logged
Check out my oil filter forensics thread!
Offended? Click here
"Yelling out of cars, turning your speakers out the window to blast your music onto the street, setting off M-80 firecrackers, firing automatic weapons into the air—these are all well and good. But none of them create a merry atmosphere of insouciance and bonhomie quite like a revving motorcycle.
bluemoco
I got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell!
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 618
'04 M800i.e. on a no (carbon) fiber diet.
Re: Terblanche and others defend the VFR1200
«
Reply #20 on:
January 08, 2010, 06:33:23 PM »
Quote from: sally101 on January 08, 2010, 11:39:34 AM
2 corrections.. The tank is actually 4.1 gallons and this dude was only getting 34mpg in his review:
http://ashonbikes.com/content/honda-vfr1200f
Now that's a deal-breaker for me..
(but I do think it looks great)
I'm an American, so I used the US Gallons measurement which is 4.9 (or 18.5L).
http://www.honda.com/newsandviews/article.aspx?id=5219
In that article you quote, they achieved 33.3 mpg with cruising speeds of 85 mph. I'd expect that my riding would be substantially slower on a freeway jaunt (maybe 75mph or so). Further, I doubt that most riders are going to be caning their personal bikes to the same degree that a moto-journo does to a test mule during a press launch. YMMV
Logged
"I'm the guy who does his job. You must be the other guy." -
Donnie Wahlberg in "The Departed"
"America is all about speed. Hot, nasty, badass speed." --
Eleanor Roosevelt, 1936
Raux
Guest
Re: Terblanche and others defend the VFR1200
«
Reply #21 on:
January 08, 2010, 10:17:26 PM »
Quote from: ducatiz on January 08, 2010, 01:19:23 PM
B-King
www.suzuki-bk.com
i'm still trying to figure out why a company named a bike after a fast food restaurant?
Logged
NuTTs
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 147
Re: Terblanche and others defend the VFR1200
«
Reply #22 on:
January 09, 2010, 12:46:14 AM »
After having owned a GS1200ADV for 9 months, a bike many people think as fugly, with a whole 105hp, 270+kg fully laden..it moved very well indeed on any kind of terrain and was probably the only ex-bike I REALLY miss. The looks weren't all that and it looked like it was put together in someone's shed but, it was a great bike.
Honda have a reputation with their VFR bikes, they are mile munchers with a touch of sportiness. I think the 1200 isn't ugly and from what I have read in the UK and Spanish press it is supposed to be a hell of a ride as long as the rider doesn't forget it's not a sports bike.
A breath of fresh air and change is always good, gets rid of the monotony (this is coming from someone with a BMW S1000RR
).
Logged
Duck-Stew
Local Moderator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 9583
Re: Terblanche and others defend the VFR1200
«
Reply #23 on:
January 09, 2010, 06:26:34 AM »
If everyone is talking about it then Honda did their job right.
It's a HONDA. If there are slight glitches, bugs, problems (low fuel range), then they'll put the engineers to work on them and have them sorted in a few model years at the latest.
Personally, I don't see what all the fuss is about. It's a good looking bike with good performance in my book. Yeah, it's a bit hefty but I've seen GoldWings M-O-V-E out and they're so heavy they measure them in tenths of a ton.
Perhaps the magazine testers just got off the new 'Priller RSV with race tires and AV gas and then got on the VFR1200...
Logged
Bike-less Portuguese immigrant enjoying life.
bluemoco
I got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell!
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 618
'04 M800i.e. on a no (carbon) fiber diet.
Re: Terblanche and others defend the VFR1200
«
Reply #24 on:
January 09, 2010, 06:40:21 AM »
For those who are pining for a lighter-weight tourer, it may be worth a call to a Honda dealer. There are some VFR 800s remaining in inventory, and I'm sure dealers would be happy to move em out the door.
Logged
"I'm the guy who does his job. You must be the other guy." -
Donnie Wahlberg in "The Departed"
"America is all about speed. Hot, nasty, badass speed." --
Eleanor Roosevelt, 1936
Scottish
Balls!
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2760
That's thinkin' with your dipstick Jimmy!
Re: Terblanche and others defend the VFR1200
«
Reply #25 on:
January 09, 2010, 07:14:11 AM »
Quote from: Duck-Stew on January 09, 2010, 06:26:34 AM
If everyone is talking about it then Honda did their job right.
It's a HONDA. If there are slight glitches, bugs, problems (low fuel range), then they'll put the engineers to work on them and have them sorted in a few model years at the latest.
Personally, I don't see what all the fuss is about. It's a good looking bike with good performance in my book. Yeah, it's a bit hefty but I've seen GoldWings M-O-V-E out and they're so heavy they measure them in tenths of a ton.
Perhaps the magazine testers just got off the new 'Priller RSV with race tires and AV gas and then got on the VFR1200...
deals gap on a goldwing/gl1800 by yellow wolf dragons tail
Logged
You can thank a soldier today, just click the link...
http://www.letssaythanks.com/Home1024.html
ducatiz
No trellis. no desmo. = Not Ducati.
Post Whore
Offline
Posts: 15591
Re: Terblanche and others defend the VFR1200
«
Reply #26 on:
January 09, 2010, 07:59:06 AM »
draggin' knee on a goldwing! woot!
Logged
Check out my oil filter forensics thread!
Offended? Click here
"Yelling out of cars, turning your speakers out the window to blast your music onto the street, setting off M-80 firecrackers, firing automatic weapons into the air—these are all well and good. But none of them create a merry atmosphere of insouciance and bonhomie quite like a revving motorcycle.
junior varsity
loves ze desmodromics.
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 7355
GT1k, 99 M900(V), 98 M900(W), 00 M900S, 02 748E/R
Re: Terblanche and others defend the VFR1200
«
Reply #27 on:
January 09, 2010, 08:41:35 AM »
seen it live at the gap. i pissed myself.
Logged
LA
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1317
The Sleek Black Beauty
Re: Terblanche and others defend the VFR1200
«
Reply #28 on:
January 09, 2010, 12:31:48 PM »
Quote from: Scottish on January 08, 2010, 07:37:48 AM
then this isn't the right ike, get the RR if that's what you want. As a sport-tourer, weight means less, it's about some corners and eating long distances fat in comfort. It's competitors are the likes of BMW and the Concours 1400, neither are light weights either.
No, you're right, the BMW's/Concours and Hondas are not the bikes for me. A tourer is one thing, but a SPORT tourer is another. Sport should say "light".
The Ducati 1200 MiltiStrada is going the right direction with significantly less weight (120 lbs?) and great power (150 HP?) to weight. Looks comfy too. I'd take it hands down, especially with Ohlins suspension.
LA
Logged
"I'm leaving this one totally stock" - Full Termi kit, Ohlins damper, Pazzo levers, lane splitters, 520 quick change 14/43 gears, DP gold press plate w/open cover, Ductile iron rotors w/cp211 pads.
R90S (hot rod), 80-900SS, Norton 850 MkIII, S4RS
Pages:
1
[
2
]
Go Up
Print
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Introductions
-----------------------------
=> Introduce Yourself
=> FAQs and Board Policies
-----------------------------
Moto Board
-----------------------------
=> General Monster Forum
=> In Memorium...Remembering our Friends
=> Riding Techniques
=> Tutorials
=> Tech
=> Accessories & Mods
=> Gear
=> Racing & Trackdays
=> Stolen Motorcycles
=> Random Cool Pics
-----------------------------
Kitchen Sink
-----------------------------
=> No Moto Content
===> Board Suggestions
===> Fixed Board Issues
=> Stella's Pop
-----------------------------
DMF Sponsors
-----------------------------
=> Valley Desmo Service
=> Ca-Cycleworks
=> New Enough.Com
=> Monsterparts
=> Minor Sponsors
=> Misc Info
-----------------------------
Local Clubs
-----------------------------
=> Monster Women
=> Ducati MOB
=> SoCal Monsters
=> CAM
=> OZ monsters
=> NorthWest
=> NEMHA
=> NYMMC
=> MHM
=> SoCO DOG
=> DFWM
=> MADDOG
=> MOCHA
=> THCM
=> AZDRA
=> M-ROC
=> Central Cal Monsters
=> DOCSF
=> MCMC
=> DDCM
=> DOCTOR
=> Hoosier Hooligans
=> OMHA
=> DOCIA
=> Rising Sun Ducatis
=> MCM
=> NMMR
=> MIA
=> Desmotropic
=> COW
=> MOTH
=> DesmOK
=> Bayou Country Ducati Riders
=> DeVal Mostro
=> Coastal Ducati Club
-----------------------------
Configurators and Calculators
-----------------------------
=> Valve Shim Calculator
Loading...
SimplePortal 2.1.1