Ducati Monster Forum

powered by:

November 26, 2024, 08:51:34 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to the DMF
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  



Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 520 Chain and Sprocket Changes  (Read 4429 times)
Evil_Ductator
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 293


05 M1000S


« on: June 02, 2008, 11:03:36 PM »

I have a Monster 1000S (2005).  It currently is running stock gears (which I believe are 15/39, please correct me if I'm wrong!). 

I decided to change the gearing for smoother low-speed running and a little more pull.  I figured why not do a 520 conversion while I'm at it.  So basically I can do any gearing combo I want at this point, since I need to swap sprockets anyway.

I know this has been discussed ad nauseum, but I can't seem to find specific info right now pertinent to my situation.

I know a lot of folks do a 14t front, and some do +2 or +3 in rear, or some combination there-of.  I'd love to get a good recommendation of what is the best all-around compromise for mostly twisties riding and a little PCH cruising ( Embarrassed ).  I will be riding to Laguna Seca (from SoCal) this year but no other long distance trips planned.

I found a RK gold 520 XW chain and Drive Systems sprockets at a local dealer in 15/42 combination.  Would this be a good pick for what I need?  Is it worth the extra cash to go for fancier name brands?


Logged
Slide Panda
Omnipotent Potentate
Post Whore
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 10137


Personal Pretext


« Reply #1 on: June 03, 2008, 05:58:22 AM »

+3 in the back is about equal to -1 up front.  With a 1000 you really shouldn't need anything more drastic.  I've got 15/42 (maybe 43 gotta check) on my 900 and it seems a good combo.  On a flat city street she'll burble along with barely any throttle w/o lugging - but there's still plenty of go to break every speed limit in the US. 

I'm no chain expert - but RK's a known brand so I wouldn't sweat that detail much if you've got a deal your happy with.
Logged

-Throttle's on the right, so are the brakes.  Good luck.
- '00 M900S with all the farkles
- '08 KTM 690 StupidMoto
- '07 Triumph 675 Track bike.
Evil_Ductator
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 293


05 M1000S


« Reply #2 on: June 03, 2008, 05:20:34 PM »

Do you recommend going up 2 or 3 in the rear?
Logged
Slide Panda
Omnipotent Potentate
Post Whore
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 10137


Personal Pretext


« Reply #3 on: June 03, 2008, 05:53:38 PM »

+3 in the back will be closer to -1 in the front than just +2.  Some folks have had issues with the chain rubbing on the swing arm when they go smaller in the front... soooo If you're planning to replace all if it anways - go up in the back.

a lot of people opt for the 14t since it's easier to swap that sprocket and generally doesn't require a new chain.  Bigger rear sprox are harder to do (gotta pull the wheel) and probably means a new chain.
Logged

-Throttle's on the right, so are the brakes.  Good luck.
- '00 M900S with all the farkles
- '08 KTM 690 StupidMoto
- '07 Triumph 675 Track bike.
hillbillypolack
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 470


« Reply #4 on: June 03, 2008, 06:50:17 PM »

I'm close to doing a 520 conversion as well.  I think I'm favoring the 15T front and a +2 in the rear.

From what I understand, maintaining the 15T will allow for a better mechanical "lever" at the countershaft, as well as having more contact to the chain for efficient pulling power.

I doubt a 14T will "hurt" anything in the front, since we're getting under 100 hp output at the shaft.
Logged
Evil_Ductator
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 293


05 M1000S


« Reply #5 on: June 03, 2008, 07:34:04 PM »

I've heard of the chain rubbing issues too, that's part of my reason, part is also that I want a 520 chain for the weight savings and less rotating mass (although I don't know how much difference that will make?).

My main thing is if I should do +2 or +3 in the rear.  I don't know if it would be a noticeable difference or not.  Anyone?
Logged
Slide Panda
Omnipotent Potentate
Post Whore
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 10137


Personal Pretext


« Reply #6 on: June 04, 2008, 05:04:01 AM »

Meh go +3.

I know that when I put a 14t on my former 620 it made a noticeable difference.  I got my 900 with it's current gearing (15/42 - I looked last night) and haven't needed to change anything.  When the time comes for a new set I'm going to keep that ratio
Logged

-Throttle's on the right, so are the brakes.  Good luck.
- '00 M900S with all the farkles
- '08 KTM 690 StupidMoto
- '07 Triumph 675 Track bike.
LA
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1317

The Sleek Black Beauty


« Reply #7 on: June 04, 2008, 09:28:43 AM »

I looked it up on the Duc web site because I thought 15/39 was very high for a stock gear for a 1000-2v, but that's right.  I'm a little surprised, because the older s4r (higher torque and HP) came with a 15/42 and the current S4R/RS (even more torque and HP) comes with a 15/43. Both the 1000's and the S4R's use the same primary ratio 1:84.

I've tried almost all the ratios in the past and find the 14/43 best all around gearing. That a 14t front hurts anything at all is a myth. I got 40,000 mi total running mainly 14s so far.

If you found the stock 15/39 bearable, I'd suggest at least a 44t rear if you are going to use a 15 front. Go with a quick change rear carrier so you can experiment easily. (Chris at Ca-cycle Works has em) Bigger than a 44t rear is harder to find.

Like I said, I find the 14/43 to be a very good all around gear. Of course YRMV.

LA
Logged

"I'm leaving this one totally stock" - Full Termi kit, Ohlins damper, Pazzo levers, lane splitters, 520 quick change 14/43 gears, DP gold press plate w/open cover, Ductile iron rotors w/cp211 pads.

R90S (hot rod), 80-900SS, Norton 850 MkIII, S4RS
Desert Dust
Ten Most Popular Uses for a
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2997


"There's no glamour in Nirvana, no glamour at all"


« Reply #8 on: May 06, 2012, 07:01:07 PM »

I'm looking into changing my 2007 S2R 1000 from a 525 chain and sprockets (stock set-up) to a 520 set-up.

1.) Is the 520 chain strong enough for the S2R 1000?

2.) I am happy with the stock gearing. Will the 520 chain change the gear ratio even if I go with the same number of teeth front and rear?   
Logged

07 S2R 1K:  "You are not special. You're not a beautiful and unique snowflake. You're the same decaying organic matter as everything else. We're all part of the same compost heap. We're all singing, all dancing crap of the world.”
Howie
Post Whore
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 17235



« Reply #9 on: May 06, 2012, 08:00:49 PM »

I'm looking into changing my 2007 S2R 1000 from a 525 chain and sprockets (stock set-up) to a 520 set-up.

1.) Is the 520 chain strong enough for the S2R 1000?

Yes, but expect it to wear out faster.

2.) I am happy with the stock gearing. Will the 520 chain change the gear ratio even if I go with the same number of teeth front and rear?


No.  
Logged
Desert Dust
Ten Most Popular Uses for a
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2997


"There's no glamour in Nirvana, no glamour at all"


« Reply #10 on: May 06, 2012, 08:15:59 PM »

Thanks. Looks like I'll be going with the 520 set-up.  waytogo   
Logged

07 S2R 1K:  "You are not special. You're not a beautiful and unique snowflake. You're the same decaying organic matter as everything else. We're all part of the same compost heap. We're all singing, all dancing crap of the world.”
NAKID
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8847



« Reply #11 on: May 06, 2012, 09:12:31 PM »

Thanks. Looks like I'll be going with the 520 set-up.  waytogo   

I did that on mine, but I went with a 15 tooth front and I want to say 43 tooth Supersprox Stealth rear, steel teeth, aluminum carrier.
Logged

2005 S2R800
2006 S2R1000
2015 Monster 821
BookEmDanO
New Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 26



« Reply #12 on: May 06, 2012, 11:25:35 PM »

I bought my 750 with 14/38. Just replaced the whole final drive with 14/40 and a 520 chain. It pulls noticeably harder but gets pretty buzzy around 80mph. I tolerate it, but it's something to keep in mind.
Logged

97 M7fiddy
vw151
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 300



« Reply #13 on: May 09, 2012, 11:53:03 AM »

I looked it up on the Duc web site because I thought 15/39 was very high for a stock gear for a 1000-2v, but that's right.  I'm a little surprised, because the older s4r (higher torque and HP) came with a 15/42 and the current S4R/RS (even more torque and HP) comes with a 15/43. Both the 1000's and the S4R's use the same primary ratio 1:84.

I've tried almost all the ratios in the past and find the 14/43 best all around gearing. That a 14t front hurts anything at all is a myth. I got 40,000 mi total running mainly 14s so far.

If you found the stock 15/39 bearable, I'd suggest at least a 44t rear if you are going to use a 15 front. Go with a quick change rear carrier so you can experiment easily. (Chris at Ca-cycle Works has em) Bigger than a 44t rear is harder to find.

Like I said, I find the 14/43 to be a very good all around gear. Of course YRMV.

LA

The higher HP and torque of the S4Rs is not the reason for the shorter gearing, the reason is power for the S4Rs starts at a 2Valve motors redline.  These motors rev to 11k as apposed to a 2V that is done at 8k. 
Logged
The ModFather
Duck Off
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1261


Monster Magnet


« Reply #14 on: May 10, 2012, 08:49:03 AM »

Here are two helpful links on this topic in case you havent seen them yet:

http://www.gearingcommander.com/

http://www.ca-cycleworks.com/shop/catalog/ducati/chain.html

Logged

2005 S2R 800 Analog Motorcycles Custom Build
2007 Sport Classic 1000S
2008 848 Track Bike
2015 Diavel Dark - Sold
2005 Monster 620 Dark - Sold
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.1.1