ok thanks guys... but it turns out it's not necessary anymore :p
believe it or not, this was actually intended to be part of a courtroom defense against allegations of 'excessive speeding' and 'riding with undue care & attention'.
don't get me wrong, I definitely WAS speeding to some extent and freely admit to that - just not *excessively* speeding, as the cop has guesstimated the speeds involved (no radar).
Now, I've actually gone and measured the corner radius in question, and using some simple(?!) physics for calculating the required lean angle at a given speed through a corner with a known radius, I've determined that at the speeds I've been accused of, the required lean angle would be 72 degrees!
As it turns out, it's been published by Michelin tire co. that the MAX available lean for maintaining traction with their pilot power 2CT's is 51.2 degrees! (pretty close to where He-Man there falls off his chart!)
So either I'm quite the miraculous rossi-wannabe, or the officer was overly generous in his 'speed by sight' calculations.... hmmmm.... wonder which one it is?
I just hope I get a judge who understands physics!