14/42 (1:3 ratio) gearing harmonics, integer gear ratios, etc...

Started by victor441, November 19, 2010, 06:30:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

OrangeDragon

I have a monster 695 with 14/42 sprockets.  I ordered a chain and after I installed it I noticed it has 104 links, not 102 links. 

I have installed a new chain a number of times but never counted the links before.  But when I went to adjust the chain tension the rear axel was further back than usual.

How bad is this?  Unsafe? Or is it ok to ride with this set up?  My safety and not doing damage to the bike are my main concerns.  I have no issue buying another chain if going with 104 links is a no no.

Thanks for your help.
2007 Monster 695 (153,000+ miles)

stopintime

Gearingcommander (not always correct) has the 695 at 106 links.

Either way, you're fine as long as you get the axle nuts and chain adjusters all tightened up the correct way.

[thumbsup]
252,000 km/seventeen years - loving it

Howie

695 is 106 links stock.  Wheel base is slightly changed, but no more than from normal chain wear.

jduke

I think incorrect chain alignment causes more problems than sprocket / link combinations.
If you adjust your chain a couple of times a year, this tool is worth the money:
https://www.motomummy.com/shop-tools/profi-laser-chain-alignment-tool/

MotoPsycho

I have the   15   43   2.867 ratio so I'm ok, right ? I really don't want to change gearing as it's perfect for where I live. I like that laser tool but I usually use a 12" straight edge off of a slider square.
Edgar: '99 M750 - 2009 Indy Ducati Rat Bike Award Winner

Howie

Quote from: GRUBBY on October 15, 2014, 04:52:08 AM
I have the   15   43   2.867 ratio so I'm ok, right ? I really don't want to change gearing as it's perfect for where I live. I like that laser tool but I usually use a 12" straight edge off of a slider square.

If it works for you, yes.  Anyway, if you want to pay attention to the hunting, non hunting and partial hunting theory, you are perfect.  As far as wear goes with hunting verses non hunting, it is true, but, IMO, trivial compared to other factors, including maintenance.