UK Military Deaths Afghanistan

Started by badgalbetty, December 07, 2010, 11:34:55 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

badgalbetty

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-10629358

Hopefully no more will be added to this list. Here are their stories,names,ages,faces,who,what and where.

Your country is proud of you as I am.

BGB
"Its never too late to be who you might have been" - George Elliot.

fastwin

I plan to list the Federal Gov't. as a dependent on my next 1040 tax filing!

I have flying honey badgers and I'm not afraid to use them!

The fact that flame throwers exist is proof that someone somewhere said "I'd sure like to set those people over there on fire but I'm just not close enough to get the job done."

CONFIDENCE: the feeling you have right before you understand the situation.

Monster Dave

I recently read an article about the current state of war and that the US and other countries around the world are entering into what's widely being called a "state of constant war".

It's a scary thing to think that it could never end. Complacency for the loss of life and sheer amount of death as a whole will change humanity forever.

ducatiz

Quote from: Monster Dave on December 08, 2010, 09:07:20 AM
I recently read an article about the current state of war and that the US and other countries around the world are entering into what's widely being called a "state of constant war".

It's a scary thing to think that it could never end. Complacency for the loss of life and sheer amount of death as a whole will change humanity forever.


That's such an interesting discussion.  I would say that it's just the opposite:  there is very little complacency.  People today react with the same horror at one death that people used to react with 100s of deaths.  Right now, we've been at war in Iraq and Afghanistan for 10 years but the number of deaths compared to other 10 year conflicts is a fraction -- yet people are far more concerned and interested in those deaths today and far angrier about them.

I agree about the "constant state of war" fears -- bear in mind that is the story backdrop of 1984.
Check out my oil filter forensics thread!                     Offended? Click here
"Yelling out of cars, turning your speakers out the window to blast your music onto the street, setting off M-80 firecrackers, firing automatic weapons into the airâ€"these are all well and good. But none of them create a merry atmosphere of insouciance and bonhomie quite like a revving motorcycle.

GAAN

The number of deaths may be a fraction

but

can anyone find any information on our number of wounded?

Monster Dave

#5
Quote from: ducatiz on December 08, 2010, 09:31:08 AM
That's such an interesting discussion.  I would say that it's just the opposite:  there is very little complacency.  People today react with the same horror at one death that people used to react with 100s of deaths.  Right now, we've been at war in Iraq and Afghanistan for 10 years but the number of deaths compared to other 10 year conflicts is a fraction -- yet people are far more concerned and interested in those deaths today and far angrier about them.

I agree about the "constant state of war" fears -- bear in mind that is the story backdrop of 1984.

True enough. I think that I would enjoy (the learning process) of writing a paper on the Humanity of Modern Warfare. While some would rightfully argue that 1 life lost is one 1 too many, you are absolutely correct that the net sum of life lost has been dramatically reduced - which in its own right is no small feat.

Quote from: Mother on December 08, 2010, 09:55:23 AM
can anyone find any information on our number of wounded?

Without factual information at hand, I'd have to conclude that based on the point made by ducatiiz, the number of wounded would also have declined in comparison to past conflicts.

Quote from: badgalbetty on December 07, 2010, 11:34:55 PM
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-10629358

Hopefully no more will be added to this list. Here are their stories,names,ages,faces,who,what and where.

Your country is proud of you as I am.

BGB

What's really sad is that looking at the ages of fallen soldiers reveals that most of then were just kids. I'd have to guess that the median age is somewhere between 22-28 years old.

That's really really sad.


GAAN

Quote from: Monster Dave on December 08, 2010, 09:58:35 AM
True enough. I think that I would enjoy (the learning process) of writing a paper on the Humanity of Modern Warfare. While some would rightfully argue that 1 life lost is one 1 too many, you are absolutely correct that the net sum of life lost has been dramatically reduced - which in its own right is no small feat.

Without factual information at hand, I'd have to conclude that based on the point made by ducatiiz, the number of wounded would also have declined in comparison to past conflicts.


superior medical technology and implementation reduces deaths

it does not reduced the amount of soldiers wounded

ducatiz

Quote from: Monster Dave on December 08, 2010, 09:58:35 AM
What's really sad is that looking at the ages of fallen soldiers reveals that most of then were just kids. I'd have to guess that the median age is somewhere between 22-28 years old.

The average age of soldiers in Vietnam was 19.  Remember the song? 

There are more than a few news websites who chronicle all of the fallen American soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines.  As far as the wounded, I don't think anyone has that available, that's probably not released.
Check out my oil filter forensics thread!                     Offended? Click here
"Yelling out of cars, turning your speakers out the window to blast your music onto the street, setting off M-80 firecrackers, firing automatic weapons into the airâ€"these are all well and good. But none of them create a merry atmosphere of insouciance and bonhomie quite like a revving motorcycle.

El Matador

Quote from: Mother on December 08, 2010, 10:06:10 AM
superior medical technology and implementation reduces deaths

it does not reduced the amount of soldiers wounded

I'm gonna have to disagree with you on this one. Superior technology vastly reduces the number of soldiers put in harms's way. 

GAAN

Quote from: El Matador on December 08, 2010, 10:32:35 AM
I'm gonna have to disagree with you on this one. Superior technology vastly reduces the number of soldiers put in harms's way. 

I said superior medical technology

meaning

our number of deaths is reduced because we save many more wounded than in previous conflict

thus

a lower death count

but

A lower death count due to that technology does not mean fewer wounded soilders


sbrguy

Quote from: El Matador on December 08, 2010, 10:32:35 AM
I'm gonna have to disagree with you on this one. Superior technology vastly reduces the number of soldiers put in harms's way. 

yeah but that is of little solice to someone that just lost their son/daughter in a war.

Monster Dave

Quote from: El Matador on December 08, 2010, 10:32:35 AM
Superior technology vastly reduces the number of soldiers put in harms's way. 

That all depends on which side you're on!!  [cheeky] Just kidding.

You're both right. But medical technology has nothing to do with risk factor reduction for wounds and/or death.

badgalbetty

Someone commented about the young age of the soldiers that were killed in vietnam. Yes, there is a difference here in ages. First off ,most of the soldiers killed in Vietnam were consripted men and women, who had no choice about joining up or where they where sent or what their job was. In this conflict , the soldiers killed  that I posted about are professional soldiers. Not conscripts. Modern warfare in a desert area is a bit different from jungle warfare from nearly 40 years ago. I too am saddened at how many people died in vietnam but one cannot compare apples to oranges. This is a different time with different personel with different training and using different weaponry. It seems to me that the majority of deaths in this conflict from a UK standpoint has been caused by IED's which is a very cowardly way to kill. It is the weapon of choice for saboteurs and terrorists, not professional fighting soldiers. Either way, one life lost in war is still one life too many. Sleep well brothers and sisters.
"Its never too late to be who you might have been" - George Elliot.

Kopfjäger

Just curious as to why you posted a link to deaths of soldiers from the UK?
Woohoohoohoo! Two personal records! For breath holding and number of sharks shot in the face.

GAAN

Quote from: kopfjäger on December 08, 2010, 11:38:49 PM
Just curious as to why you posted a link to deaths of soldiers from the UK?

She's british