Math Question

[Bick]

He's pretty good at spatchcocking a chicken... 

I've seen it in person, the man's got mad skills!



P.S.  It's not what you think...
 

You mean it is not a cooking term?

[RAT900]

He's pretty good at spatchcocking a chicken... 

I've seen it in person, the man's got mad skills!



P.S.  It's not what you think...
 

I think I saw a spatchcocking in Tijuana once...many years ago...I was very drunk on Mexican Worm Whisky

[The Bacon Junkie]

You mean it is not a cooking term?

Hush, you!   

I was going to make a reference to eating the chicken afterwards, but now it doesn't sound as dirty...   

[akmnstr]

Spatchcocking  defined  http://www.nakedwhiz.com/spatchdef.htm

[SacDuc]

I can't believe that this thread has now gone on 5 pages when the answer was given on page 1.  It has been stated and re-stated.  Someone seems to be a little slow on the pickup here.  No disrespect intended, just a morning observation.  I'm sure there is something other than statistics that Sac is good at.

Um no. No it is not.

But since I'm such a retard and you are so smart I'm certain your next post will contain an equation that answers this question:

It is finite. Either A happens or A doesn't happen. Lets call that one B. So the claim is that A happens 99% of the time and B happens 1% of the time. How do I figure out how many trials I have to run in order to verify this to a degree of 95% accuracy. 0 trials gives you 0% accuracy on your verification. Infinite trials gives you 100% accuracy. How do I determine how accurately I have verified the 99:1 claim with a given number of trials somewhere between 0 and infinity.

sac

Some how I think it will not actually contain a solvable equation but rather just rambling about how certain mathematical concepts need to be applied.

Thanks for the derision though that always brightens my day. Especially when its sprinkled with arrogance.

sac

[The Bacon Junkie]

Spatchcock























In my infinite lack of maturity, I just wanted to say it again!   

[akmnstr]

Some how I think it will not actually contain a solvable equation but rather just rambling about how certain mathematical concepts need to be applied.

Thanks for the derision though that always brightens my day. Especially when its sprinkled with arrogance.

sac

Oh Sac,  don't be so sensitive.  This is all in fun. 

[ducpainter]

Oh Sac,  don't be so sensitive.  This is all in fun. 

It's only good when he's serving.

[SacDuc]

It's only good when he's serving.

And its only thread jacking when other people do it. Go be a hypocrite in some other thread.


sac

[ducpainter]

And its only thread jacking when other people do it. Go be a hypocrite in some other thread.


sac

Like I said...

[il d00d]

I don't want to live in a world where a thread about *math* on a motorcycle forum gets locked.  Let's all get in the secular Winter holiday celebration spirit.  I'm saying let's all and drink and wallow in existential anguish.  About other things.

[Speedbag]

Spatchcock?!?

Sounds like a great innerweb forum name.....