Ducati Monster Forum

powered by:

February 07, 2025, 07:24:17 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Please Help
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  



Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Suspension Geometry Question  (Read 2085 times)
jim_0068
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 229


« on: January 03, 2011, 11:45:02 AM »

So

let's say you have your ducati setup per the factory for fork height and rear ride height. You then push up the forks in the triple an inch.

Could you lower the rear ride height an inch and everything is still neutral or is it just not that simple?

--------

I know motors just not much about suspension so help me out.

Thanks Cheesy
Logged
stopintime
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9063


S2R 800 '07


« Reply #1 on: January 03, 2011, 12:06:37 PM »

There will be a small difference in the "gearing" at the upper shock pivot mount, but I believe that's negligible.
Also the swingarm will operate differently. I have no idea how much that means.

However, your bike would become quite low - maybe clearance issues?

So, not totally neutral. I guess on a racer level you won't find many people supporting these alerations,
but for a modest street rider it might be ok....
Logged

252,000 km/seventeen years - loving it
xcaptainxbloodx
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 954


« Reply #2 on: January 03, 2011, 05:34:34 PM »

So

let's say you have your ducati setup per the factory for fork height and rear ride height. You then push up the forks in the triple an inch.

Could you lower the rear ride height an inch and everything is still neutral or is it just not that simple?

--------

I know motors just not much about suspension so help me out.

Thanks Cheesy

will it be neutral in terms of a light/heavy front end? yes
will it be neutral in terms of handling the same as before? no

lowering the whole bike an inch would negatively affect the handling to a noticeable degree at any level of riding.
Logged
jim_0068
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 229


« Reply #3 on: January 03, 2011, 06:13:55 PM »

lowering the whole bike an inch would negatively affect the handling to a noticeable degree at any level of riding.

Right but pushing the forks up which is lowering the front end doesn't negate any of lowering the back of the bike?
Logged
stopintime
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9063


S2R 800 '07


« Reply #4 on: January 04, 2011, 02:09:04 AM »

Right but pushing the forks up which is lowering the front end doesn't negate any of lowering the back of the bike?

Yes, it does, but the rear linkage and swingarm geometry will change.
If I'm not mistaken - lowering front & rear affect handling less than lowering only the front or only the rear.

Maybe it's time to find out why you're asking and what you want to achieve? The answers might be more accurate then.
Logged

252,000 km/seventeen years - loving it
greenmonster
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1293


« Reply #5 on: January 04, 2011, 04:22:05 AM »

What model & year do you have?
From its rear setting now, is it possible to lower it?
Logged

M900 -97 
MTS 1100s  -07
battlecry
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 669


On a silver black phantom bike...


« Reply #6 on: January 04, 2011, 05:54:08 AM »

Time for a 16" rear wheel?
Logged
jim_0068
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 229


« Reply #7 on: January 04, 2011, 11:59:03 AM »

keeping my options open for clip ons above triple.

i have a s2r 800, ill have to check if i have room to lower. to be honest i think it is too low now and isnt at proper ride height.
Logged
Speeddog
West Valley Flatlander
Flounder-Administrator
Post Whore
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14813


RIP Nicky


« Reply #8 on: January 04, 2011, 12:12:28 PM »

With the forks pushed up an inch, I'd worry most about the front tire hitting the cylinder head on a big bump.
Logged

- - - - - Valley Desmo Service - - - - -
Reseda, CA

(951) 640-8908


~~~ "We've rearranged the deck chairs, refilled the champagne glasses, and the band sounds great. This is fine." - Alberto Puig ~~~
stopintime
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9063


S2R 800 '07


« Reply #9 on: January 04, 2011, 01:39:09 PM »

^^^^^ +1

I don't think there will be enough threads available to lower it an inch (from factory ride height rod settings)

Good idea to investigate  waytogo , but your new clip ons go below the triple Wink
Logged

252,000 km/seventeen years - loving it
jim_0068
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 229


« Reply #10 on: January 04, 2011, 04:14:28 PM »

lol, don't have clip ons yet and i am swaping some GSXR forks on my bike so there will be some extra fork sticking above the triple (about a 1/4") so i don't have to drop them a full inch to go above but again, just keeping my options open.

thanks
Logged
xcaptainxbloodx
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 954


« Reply #11 on: January 04, 2011, 07:25:44 PM »

I have no FHE but there is room to move the forks through the triples and maintain the stock rear. Its supposed to give a more nimble sportier feel. the danger is that too much will make a twitchy front end. if you use a damper, you can get away with more aggressive angles.

I would look into exactly how much you would need to push through in order to make it work with a stock rear height. lowering the rear of the bike to make clip ons work is a bad idea, it will NOT  neutralize the front end changes but rather degrade the overall handling of the bike.
Logged
The Mad King Pepe'
The Fifth Element was created from my
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2279



« Reply #12 on: January 05, 2011, 03:24:50 AM »

Instead of playing with the bike's geometry to put the clip-ons above the triple, it would be better for you to get clip-ons with risers and put them below the triples.
They might cost more in the end, but you wont ruin the bike's handling or risk tank slappers. Just my $0.02 waytogo and  [moto]
Logged

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out-- Because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out-- Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out-- Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.1.1