Ducati Monster Forum

powered by:

February 13, 2025, 02:58:41 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Tapatalk users...click me
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  



Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: JHP Ducati 2V SBK 1088 cc (120 hp, 300lb)  (Read 32256 times)
Raux
Guest
« Reply #45 on: February 19, 2011, 12:07:11 AM »

Frame/swingarm, and tank/fairing/seat/tail.  Nothing else needed here.  I was THIS CLOSE to dropping some coin on Kaemna stuff, but would like to hear what you think the "kit" might cost.  Last time I checked on the pierbon frame it was over 4500 alone....and not street legal/no vin.

the F042 is street legal. that's what this bike is based on.
Logged
junior varsity
loves ze desmodromics.
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7355


GT1k, 99 M900(V), 98 M900(W), 00 M900S, 02 748E/R


« Reply #46 on: February 19, 2011, 08:52:11 AM »

Hmm... They have changed the F042 website - I was going to link to the "track" version which is not street legal, but it has been taken down, it now only lists the F042 "hstreet"
Logged

Travman
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2488

‘70 Guzzi, ‘73 Norton, ‘73 V7 Sport, ‘12 V7 Racer


« Reply #47 on: February 19, 2011, 05:44:26 PM »

What do you think about starting with a latest generation SBK with a blown engine?  That way you have your rolling chassis and don't have to worry about your title & registration.  The problem is finding something like that before somebody gets it and parts it out.  


When I see the above picture I want to make a naked bike in the style of Radical Ducati's bikes with a pumped up air-cooled engine, V-Rod headlight, and cool wasp-like tail section.  The tank looks good as is from this angle.
« Last Edit: February 19, 2011, 06:26:08 PM by Travman » Logged
TAftonomos
is without a monster :(
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2482



« Reply #48 on: February 19, 2011, 07:22:01 PM »

Thats what I did, although I used a 749R. waytogo
Logged

derby
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5267



« Reply #49 on: February 19, 2011, 10:50:56 PM »

Thats what I did, although I used a 749R. waytogo

what was your final weight?

i think the biggest "problem" with a stock roller is expecting it to weigh >100lbs less than a superbike w/o the radiator. add to that pairing it w/ a less powerful motor, and it seems like a fun, but ultimately disappointing (performance-wise) , project.
« Last Edit: February 19, 2011, 11:00:15 PM by derby » Logged

-- derby

'07 Suz GSX-R750

Retired rides: '05 Duc Monster S4R, '99 Yam YZF-R1, '98 Hon CBR600F3, '97 Suz GSX-R750, '96 Hon CBR600F3, '94 Hon CBR600F2, '91 Hon Hawk GT, '91 Yam YSR-50, '87 Yam YSR-50

click here for info about my avatar
Raux
Guest
« Reply #50 on: February 20, 2011, 02:17:38 AM »

the 749 era bike is heavier than the 848 era bike if I remember right.

Logged
ducpainter
The Often Hated
Flounder-Administrator
Post Whore
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 79002


DILLIGAF


« Reply #51 on: February 20, 2011, 04:41:26 AM »

the 749 era bike is heavier than the 848 era bike if I remember right.


A lot of that weight was lost in the engine cases.
Logged

"Once you accept that a child on the autistic spectrum experiences the world in
 a completely different way than you, you will be open to understand how that
 perspective
    is even more amazing than yours."
    To realize the value of nine  months:
    Ask a mother who gave birth to a stillborn.
"Don't piss off old people The older we get, the less 'Life in Prison' is a deterrent.”


zooom
wishing I had some colorful enough tights for my
Post Whore
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 11905


when your gas is natural and has a name...


« Reply #52 on: February 20, 2011, 06:25:50 AM »

A lot of that weight was lost in the engine cases.

true, but there was a minimal drop in the frame weight, because I seem to recall it being a thinner walled tube, IIRC....
Logged

99 Cagiva Gran Canyon-"FOR SALE", PM for details.
98 Monster 900(trackpregnant dog-soon to be made my Fiancee's upgrade streetbike)
2010 KTM 990 SM-T
ducpainter
The Often Hated
Flounder-Administrator
Post Whore
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 79002


DILLIGAF


« Reply #53 on: February 20, 2011, 06:34:40 AM »

true, but there was a minimal drop in the frame weight, because I seem to recall it being a thinner walled tube, IIRC....
Isn't the intent to get a 2V bike close to the weight of the JHP bike?

I don't think that will happen using a stock frame of any era unless other drastic weight saving measures are employed.

As you get closer to the 300 lb number it gets harder...and more expensive.
Logged

"Once you accept that a child on the autistic spectrum experiences the world in
 a completely different way than you, you will be open to understand how that
 perspective
    is even more amazing than yours."
    To realize the value of nine  months:
    Ask a mother who gave birth to a stillborn.
"Don't piss off old people The older we get, the less 'Life in Prison' is a deterrent.”


zooom
wishing I had some colorful enough tights for my
Post Whore
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 11905


when your gas is natural and has a name...


« Reply #54 on: February 20, 2011, 06:37:13 AM »

Isn't the intent to get a 2V bike close to the weight of the JHP bike?

I don't think that will happen using a stock frame of any era unless other drastic weight saving measures are employed.

As you get closer to the 300 lb number it gets harder...and more expensive.

very true...and the materials used in the F042 frame as well as others is a lighter material to start with...
Logged

99 Cagiva Gran Canyon-"FOR SALE", PM for details.
98 Monster 900(trackpregnant dog-soon to be made my Fiancee's upgrade streetbike)
2010 KTM 990 SM-T
junior varsity
loves ze desmodromics.
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7355


GT1k, 99 M900(V), 98 M900(W), 00 M900S, 02 748E/R


« Reply #55 on: February 20, 2011, 08:07:09 AM »

Yeah, I was going to mention that the pierobon frame is lighter, as are NCR frames, the Alu frame shown on Motowheels, and the carbon frame from Bike Research.
Logged

TAftonomos
is without a monster :(
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2482



« Reply #56 on: February 21, 2011, 06:22:16 PM »

I'll be happy to get to 340lbs with what I'm spending.

The goal at this point is to get it on the road/track, and develop it as I go.  Since I don't have anywhere near an unlimited budget, I want to prove a concept (for myself) before I invest a boatload of money to make it super light.

No point in me spending 5-6K in lightweight stuff when I might not have another 2-3k to make it actually run....then I end up with a bunch of cool parts sitting on a non-running bike.

This way, I've got the bike, it runs, runs well, and I can "add lightness" as my budget will allow (BST's, CMC rotors, monocoque seat, etc.).  If I could give up budgeting for the multi or dievel (oh god..I have to ride it before I buy the mts1200), I think I could run out and snag every cool part off the shelf.  Still, I want a new bike, and that multi has had my mind wrapped around it in a big way for a long time.

decisions decisions....MTS1200, ride all day everyday.  Or 2v sbk, wear myself out after 3 hours riding in the mountains.....
« Last Edit: February 21, 2011, 06:25:11 PM by TAftonomos » Logged

ducpainter
The Often Hated
Flounder-Administrator
Post Whore
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 79002


DILLIGAF


« Reply #57 on: February 21, 2011, 06:32:25 PM »

<snip>
decisions decisions....MTS1200, ride all day everyday.  Or 2v sbk, wear myself out after 3 hours riding in the mountains.....
Maybe the gym is in order... Grin
Logged

"Once you accept that a child on the autistic spectrum experiences the world in
 a completely different way than you, you will be open to understand how that
 perspective
    is even more amazing than yours."
    To realize the value of nine  months:
    Ask a mother who gave birth to a stillborn.
"Don't piss off old people The older we get, the less 'Life in Prison' is a deterrent.”


TAftonomos
is without a monster :(
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2482



« Reply #58 on: February 21, 2011, 06:36:55 PM »

Not so much the gym.....being 6'5" has many advantages.  Fitting correctly for extended periods on time on a SBK anything isn't one of them Cheesy


No final weight at this point Derby....I haven't got all the bits on the thing yet  waytogo
« Last Edit: February 21, 2011, 06:38:41 PM by TAftonomos » Logged

junior varsity
loves ze desmodromics.
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7355


GT1k, 99 M900(V), 98 M900(W), 00 M900S, 02 748E/R


« Reply #59 on: February 21, 2011, 06:59:04 PM »


No point in me spending 5-6K in lightweight stuff when I might not have another 2-3k to make it actually run....then I end up with a bunch of cool parts sitting on a non-running bike.


i see what you did there, with the invisible finger pointing! Touche'
Logged

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.1.1