Ducati Monster Forum

powered by:

February 12, 2025, 11:19:41 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: No Registration with MSN emails
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  



Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: JHP Ducati 2V SBK 1088 cc (120 hp, 300lb)  (Read 32201 times)
TAftonomos
is without a monster :(
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2482



« Reply #60 on: February 21, 2011, 07:07:47 PM »

no no!  That wasn't intended, please don't take it that way. 

I've been down the road I described MANY times, I just won't let it happen again.
Logged

junior varsity
loves ze desmodromics.
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7355


GT1k, 99 M900(V), 98 M900(W), 00 M900S, 02 748E/R


« Reply #61 on: February 21, 2011, 07:12:18 PM »

i know, and no offense taken!  kind of a tongue in cheek thing over here for me seeing in the garage!

It would be alive and running by now had I not invested in a real heap of a 900 to practice my fixxer-upper skills.
Logged

DoubleEagle
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3541


" If you are unafraid you will be safe "


« Reply #62 on: February 21, 2011, 07:19:30 PM »

My 1098 R weighs 363 lbs. dry @ 175 RWHP w, full race Termi and DP ECU

That's 2.07 lbs. per 1 hp

The JHP bike is 2.5 lbs. per 1 hp

I bet the JHP bike costs more than my R cost new ,which was MSRP $40,000 +tax and fees.

Dolph    Smiley
Logged

'08 Ducati 1098 R    '09 BMW K 1300 GT   '10 BMW S 1000 RR

Shortest sentence...." I am "   Longest sentence ... " I Do "
Triple J
Guest
« Reply #63 on: February 21, 2011, 08:46:21 PM »

My 1098 R weighs 363 lbs. dry @ 175 RWHP w, full race Termi and DP ECU

Out of curiosity have you verified that weight?  Wink
Logged
TAftonomos
is without a monster :(
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2482



« Reply #64 on: February 21, 2011, 09:07:53 PM »

It's more fun to ride a slow bike fast, than a fast bike slow.
Logged

DoubleEagle
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3541


" If you are unafraid you will be safe "


« Reply #65 on: February 21, 2011, 10:09:55 PM »

Out of curiosity have you verified that weight?  Wink
No,

I take Ducati's word on that.

Dolph       [moto]
Logged

'08 Ducati 1098 R    '09 BMW K 1300 GT   '10 BMW S 1000 RR

Shortest sentence...." I am "   Longest sentence ... " I Do "
DoubleEagle
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3541


" If you are unafraid you will be safe "


« Reply #66 on: February 21, 2011, 10:13:22 PM »

It's more fun to ride a slow bike fast, than a fast bike slow.
Who rides a fast bike slow ?

Dolph     [moto]     
Logged

'08 Ducati 1098 R    '09 BMW K 1300 GT   '10 BMW S 1000 RR

Shortest sentence...." I am "   Longest sentence ... " I Do "
junior varsity
loves ze desmodromics.
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7355


GT1k, 99 M900(V), 98 M900(W), 00 M900S, 02 748E/R


« Reply #67 on: February 21, 2011, 10:40:14 PM »

Who rides a fast bike slow ?

Dolph     [moto]     

more people than you'd imagine. (but they simply "NEED" that much power!)
Logged

DoubleEagle
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3541


" If you are unafraid you will be safe "


« Reply #68 on: February 21, 2011, 11:14:21 PM »

more people than you'd imagine. (but they simply "NEED" that much power!)
I'm sure there are those that can't put that much power to good use ....I'm not one of them.

I ride to the edge ...not sayin' there aren't faster riders on the road.

Dolph     [moto]
Logged

'08 Ducati 1098 R    '09 BMW K 1300 GT   '10 BMW S 1000 RR

Shortest sentence...." I am "   Longest sentence ... " I Do "
kopfjäger
Post Whore
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 33163


Feral 859


WWW
« Reply #69 on: February 22, 2011, 12:52:05 AM »

My 1098 R weighs 363 lbs. dry @ 175 RWHP w, full race Termi and DP ECU

That's 2.07 lbs. per 1 hp

The JHP bike is 2.5 lbs. per 1 hp

I bet the JHP bike costs more than my R cost new ,which was MSRP $40,000 +tax and fees.

Dolph    Smiley

Wet weight, we don't drive them dry. 1 gallon of gas weighs (6lbs) 4qts of oil (?) plus battery. Now do the math.
Logged

“Woohoohoohoo! Two personal records! For breath holding and number of sharks shot in the frickin\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
DoubleEagle
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3541


" If you are unafraid you will be safe "


« Reply #70 on: February 22, 2011, 01:41:16 AM »

Wet weight, we don't drive them dry. 1 gallon of gas weighs (6lbs) 4qts of oil (?) plus battery. Now do the math.
Isn't the JHP bike weight quoted Dry ?

Dolph     [moto]
Logged

'08 Ducati 1098 R    '09 BMW K 1300 GT   '10 BMW S 1000 RR

Shortest sentence...." I am "   Longest sentence ... " I Do "
zooom
wishing I had some colorful enough tights for my
Post Whore
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 11905


when your gas is natural and has a name...


« Reply #71 on: February 22, 2011, 04:35:35 AM »

Isn't the JHP bike weight quoted Dry ?

 

knowing Douglas the way I do, if it is "dry", that means without gas in it, otherwise ready to go.
Logged

99 Cagiva Gran Canyon-"FOR SALE", PM for details.
98 Monster 900(trackpregnant dog-soon to be made my Fiancee's upgrade streetbike)
2010 KTM 990 SM-T
Triple J
Guest
« Reply #72 on: February 22, 2011, 08:27:34 AM »

No,

I take Ducati's word on that.

Dolph       [moto]

You should try to get a real world weight. I'm not bagging on your R...it is definitely a light bike. But Ducati is very optimistic in their weights (as Cycleworld proved with the MTS1200 recently), and their definition of dry likely doesn't even include a battery being in the bike.

Besides all that, I'd still take a 120hp 320lb (wet) bike over a 170 hp 400 lb (wet) bike. It should be significantly quicker handling due to the much lower weight.  waytogo
« Last Edit: February 22, 2011, 08:29:24 AM by Triple J » Logged
derby
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5267



« Reply #73 on: February 22, 2011, 08:55:47 AM »


Besides all that, I'd still take a 120hp 320lb (wet) bike over a 170 hp 400 lb (wet) bike. It should be significantly quicker handling due to the much lower weight.  waytogo

also, you can make a fat bike scoot w/ more power, but you can't hide that weight from the brakes.
Logged

-- derby

'07 Suz GSX-R750

Retired rides: '05 Duc Monster S4R, '99 Yam YZF-R1, '98 Hon CBR600F3, '97 Suz GSX-R750, '96 Hon CBR600F3, '94 Hon CBR600F2, '91 Hon Hawk GT, '91 Yam YSR-50, '87 Yam YSR-50

click here for info about my avatar
Travman
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2488

‘70 Guzzi, ‘73 Norton, ‘73 V7 Sport, ‘12 V7 Racer


« Reply #74 on: February 22, 2011, 10:47:15 AM »

The manufacturers are very optimistic about their weight and hp/torque ratings.  I like Motorcycle Consumer News because they do their own measurements. They have an 2008 1098S listed at 434 lbs wet with 138 rwhp.
http://www.mcnews.com/mcn/articles/2010JanIndex.pdf
« Last Edit: February 22, 2011, 10:49:41 AM by Travman » Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.1.1