Ducati Monster Forum

powered by:

February 12, 2025, 10:04:39 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: No Registration with MSN emails
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  



Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Diavel vs V-Max quarter mile race  (Read 12827 times)
Howie
Post Whore
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 17355



« Reply #15 on: April 10, 2011, 08:05:00 PM »

I would still like to see 2-3 more tries at the quarter-miler.  that's just too insignificant of a difference.

Unless you are a V-Max fan.



























PS
I agree with you.
Logged
jvax
in the land of the rising sun
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 283



« Reply #16 on: April 10, 2011, 09:17:09 PM »



Do we know if DTC was on/off on the Diavel in that race?  might have had something to do with the result...

Also, would a Termi full exaust system help the Diavel?  I imagine it would, but I guess the two bikes were intentionally raced as stock...



Logged

'08 R1200GS
'10 M796 ABS Black (Sold)
thought
Everyone needs a
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2366



« Reply #17 on: April 10, 2011, 09:20:12 PM »

imo, the big thing about the diavel isnt the straight line performance... what's special about it is the fact that you wont have hard bits dragging the second you make a turn.  so if the vmax beats it in the 1/4 mile by a couple of 10ths... meh.

what i would like to see is both those bikes go through a hot lap and see who comes out on top then.
Logged

'10 SFS 1098
'11 M796 ABS - Sold
'05 SV650N - Sold
KRJ
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 974


'07 MTS 1100S , '03 XR650L , '78 KZ 1000


« Reply #18 on: April 10, 2011, 09:41:43 PM »



  I agree, the V MAX Has always been intended to be s straight line, drag race, MuscleBike. If It didn't win I would be very suprised, right on ,I don't think that was the intent of the Ducati, Who have never been into production drag racing marketing, damn good race for the V MAX, but...
Logged

" I believe You understand what You think I said, but I'm not sure You realize that what You heard is not what I meant " !!
Punx Clever
It never got strange enough for my
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1447



« Reply #19 on: April 10, 2011, 11:19:52 PM »

8.5cc:cv vs 7.4cc:cv (i.e. 1700/200 vs 1198/162)

the vmax has an inefficient engine design then, because for the amount of cc:hp, they are making very little advantage over the diavel's 1198ccs.  for the vmax engine to be as efficient at making 200 hp as the diavel's engine, it should be only 1480 cc.

likewise, if the diavel engine was as inefficient as the vmax with the same displacement, it would only make 140 hp.

if the diavel engine design maintains the same efficiency with increased displacement, it would produce 230hp with 1700ccs.

I just pointed out that a v-4 has the potential to produce more HP.  If all else remains the same (displacement, bore:stroke ~ 1, etc) the v-4 can spin a lot faster cause the pistons wouldn't have to move as far in the same amount of time.  High RPM HP is easier to get than low RPM HP, and HP is what makes you go fast!
Logged

2008 S2R 1000 - Archangel

The Edge... there is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over.  - HST
corey
Is that a throttle tube in your pocket? Or just your
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2799


'06 Tang/Black S2R800


« Reply #20 on: April 11, 2011, 03:43:56 AM »

too bad neither of them could outrun the ugly.
Logged

When all the land lays in ruin... And burnination has forsaken the countryside... Only one guy will remain... My money's on...
pennyrobber
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1826



« Reply #21 on: April 11, 2011, 06:52:53 AM »

too bad neither of them could outrun the ugly.
  laughingdp


What gets my attention is the launch itself. The portly Vmax roasts the rear while the Diavel lofts the front. Really speaks to the character of each bike. I prefer the latter.
Logged

Men face reality and women don't. That's why men need to drink. -George Christopher
ducatiz
No trellis. no desmo. = Not Ducati.
Post Whore
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 15591



« Reply #22 on: April 11, 2011, 06:56:36 AM »

  laughingdp


What gets my attention is the launch itself. The portly Vmax roasts the rear while the Diavel lofts the front. Really speaks to the character of each bike. I prefer the latter.

Portly?  Pardon me, do you have any grey poupon?
Logged

Check out my oil filter forensics thread!                     Offended? Click here
"Yelling out of cars, turning your speakers out the window to blast your music onto the street, setting off M-80 firecrackers, firing automatic weapons into the air—these are all well and good. But none of them create a merry atmosphere of insouciance and bonhomie quite like a revving motorcycle.
duccarlos
Local Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7994



WWW
« Reply #23 on: April 11, 2011, 11:16:33 AM »

too bad neither of them could outrun the ugly.

 waytogo

500 more ccs, it would be obvious. I'm more surprised that it was close. Which one is more expensive? If you ride in FL, then the VMAx might be the better choice. Anywhere else where you actually need to turn, the Diavel.

Did they do multiple runs with the riders switching bikes? I would rather look at averages. The VMax should take it 9 out of 10 times.
Logged

my keyboard just served me with paternity suit.
TAftonomos
is without a monster :(
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2482



« Reply #24 on: April 11, 2011, 01:57:07 PM »

Vmax got a terrible launch.  Wish they had the 60' times  waytogo
Logged

muskrat
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8335



« Reply #25 on: April 11, 2011, 05:27:12 PM »

this thread is starting to look like a mac forum  laughingdp
so what, it got beat.  the vmax was made for the drag strip.  next!
Logged

Can we thin the gene pool? 

2015 MTS 1200
09 Electra Glide
zooom
wishing I had some colorful enough tights for my
Post Whore
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 11905


when your gas is natural and has a name...


« Reply #26 on: April 11, 2011, 06:30:53 PM »

I love how everyone forgets that the V-Max is a shaft drive which loses more power at the wheel than a chain or belt drive....
Logged

99 Cagiva Gran Canyon-"FOR SALE", PM for details.
98 Monster 900(trackpregnant dog-soon to be made my Fiancee's upgrade streetbike)
2010 KTM 990 SM-T
Punx Clever
It never got strange enough for my
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1447



« Reply #27 on: April 11, 2011, 06:53:02 PM »

It still has 40 more HP... don't thing the power losses in the final drive are THAT significant.
Logged

2008 S2R 1000 - Archangel

The Edge... there is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over.  - HST
zooom
wishing I had some colorful enough tights for my
Post Whore
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 11905


when your gas is natural and has a name...


« Reply #28 on: April 12, 2011, 03:08:56 AM »

It still has 40 more HP... don't thing the power losses in the final drive are THAT significant.

wanna bet?....at the wheel, the difference would probably be nowhere near as much as you think...
Logged

99 Cagiva Gran Canyon-"FOR SALE", PM for details.
98 Monster 900(trackpregnant dog-soon to be made my Fiancee's upgrade streetbike)
2010 KTM 990 SM-T
hbliam
Guest
« Reply #29 on: April 12, 2011, 01:42:56 PM »

wanna bet?....at the wheel, the difference would probably be nowhere near as much as you think...

Diavel 162 HP claimed, about 135 at the rear wheel = about 17% less then crank HP
http://www.ducati.ms/forums/179-diavel/107641-diavel-dyno-results.html

Vmax 197 HP claimed, about 174 at the rear wheel = about 11.5% less then crank HP
http://www.rswarrior.com/forums/19-general-bike-talk/151495-dynoed-finally-real-2009-vmax-torque-hp-numbers.html
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.1.1