Ducati Monster Forum

powered by:

November 03, 2024, 07:42:44 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Tapatalk users...click me
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  



Pages: 1 ... 23 24 [25] 26 27 28   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 1199 Photo leak!  (Read 83837 times)
Raux
Guest
« Reply #360 on: November 03, 2011, 04:24:42 AM »

So, I've been thinking about the middleweight replacement of the 848 based on the 1199...

I've two ideas formulating. With the ability to get an ultra high revving 2 cyl with the configuration would Ducati go back to trying to compete in the supersport 600 class with a new 750?

to get there and keeping near the same ratio of the superquadrata bore/stroke it could have a bore x stroke of 96mm x 51.8mm for a capacity of 749 cc's

if they want to keep the 848 size and stick with the racing series they have now, then it could have 100mm x 54mm for a capacity of 848 cc's

these both keep a bore x stroke ratio of about 1.85 and seem reasonable giving the 112mm x 60.6mm dimensions of the 1199


Thoughts?
Logged
zarn02
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2642



« Reply #361 on: November 03, 2011, 05:54:20 AM »

I think Ducati has probably sold enough 848s that they don't care about supersport class racing.

And their lack of a bike that conforms to those class rules was a nice "out" for a class in which they weren't competitive.
Logged

"If it weren't for our gallows humor, we'd have nothing to hang our hopes on."
ducatiz
No trellis. no desmo. = Not Ducati.
Post Whore
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 15590



« Reply #362 on: November 03, 2011, 05:56:49 AM »

On the other hand, if they can make a superquad at about 750 cc that has the same weight difference that the 848 did compared to the 1098, then it could happen and be competitive. 

They would have to make a new case though -- merely using thicker jugs would add too much weight. 
Logged

Check out my oil filter forensics thread!                     Offended? Click here
"Yelling out of cars, turning your speakers out the window to blast your music onto the street, setting off M-80 firecrackers, firing automatic weapons into the air—these are all well and good. But none of them create a merry atmosphere of insouciance and bonhomie quite like a revving motorcycle.
duccarlos
Local Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7994



WWW
« Reply #363 on: November 03, 2011, 06:48:28 AM »

They would have to make a new case though -- merely using thicker jugs would add too much weight. 

Bigger jugs are always a good thing  Grin
Logged

my keyboard just served me with paternity suit.
junior varsity
loves ze desmodromics.
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7355


GT1k, 99 M900(V), 98 M900(W), 00 M900S, 02 748E/R


« Reply #364 on: November 03, 2011, 08:06:56 AM »

Only up to the point that my bike won't have future lower back problems. (snicker snicker)
Logged

Raux
Guest
« Reply #365 on: November 03, 2011, 10:30:15 AM »

On the other hand, if they can make a superquad at about 750 cc that has the same weight difference that the 848 did compared to the 1098, then it could happen and be competitive. 

They would have to make a new case though -- merely using thicker jugs would add too much weight. 
from what I can tell it would add about 1.2 kg
Logged
ducatiz
No trellis. no desmo. = Not Ducati.
Post Whore
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 15590



« Reply #366 on: November 03, 2011, 10:59:15 AM »

from what I can tell it would add about 1.2 kg


wow, i figured no more than .75 kg!
Logged

Check out my oil filter forensics thread!                     Offended? Click here
"Yelling out of cars, turning your speakers out the window to blast your music onto the street, setting off M-80 firecrackers, firing automatic weapons into the air—these are all well and good. But none of them create a merry atmosphere of insouciance and bonhomie quite like a revving motorcycle.
Raux
Guest
« Reply #367 on: November 03, 2011, 11:16:56 AM »

wow, i figured no more than .75 kg!

your figure is probably more precise, I just did a rough calculation and really didn't think to hard on the formulas
Logged
ducatiz
No trellis. no desmo. = Not Ducati.
Post Whore
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 15590



« Reply #368 on: November 03, 2011, 11:22:19 AM »

your figure is probably more precise, I just did a rough calculation and really didn't think to hard on the formulas

i weighed a pair of M600 cylinders vs a pair of M800.  the walls on the 600 are noticeably thicker.
Logged

Check out my oil filter forensics thread!                     Offended? Click here
"Yelling out of cars, turning your speakers out the window to blast your music onto the street, setting off M-80 firecrackers, firing automatic weapons into the air—these are all well and good. But none of them create a merry atmosphere of insouciance and bonhomie quite like a revving motorcycle.
Raux
Guest
« Reply #369 on: November 03, 2011, 11:27:20 AM »

i weighed a pair of M600 cylinders vs a pair of M800.  the walls on the 600 are noticeably thicker.

they actually would only be 8mm thicker. (112mm - 96mm)/2
Logged
ducatiz
No trellis. no desmo. = Not Ducati.
Post Whore
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 15590



« Reply #370 on: November 03, 2011, 11:29:40 AM »

they actually would only be 8mm thicker. (112mm - 96mm)/2


right 8mm thick by the height, about 60-65mm
Logged

Check out my oil filter forensics thread!                     Offended? Click here
"Yelling out of cars, turning your speakers out the window to blast your music onto the street, setting off M-80 firecrackers, firing automatic weapons into the air—these are all well and good. But none of them create a merry atmosphere of insouciance and bonhomie quite like a revving motorcycle.
junior varsity
loves ze desmodromics.
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7355


GT1k, 99 M900(V), 98 M900(W), 00 M900S, 02 748E/R


« Reply #371 on: November 03, 2011, 11:41:07 AM »

What? They don't have to be thicker, you just don't machine as big a whole in the cases...  People bore their cases for bigger cylinders with some regularity, doing it at the factory level (boring the initial cylinder hole smaller than the 1199's) would be easy, I'd think.
Logged

ducatiz
No trellis. no desmo. = Not Ducati.
Post Whore
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 15590



« Reply #372 on: November 03, 2011, 11:51:32 AM »

What? They don't have to be thicker, you just don't machine as big a whole in the cases...  People bore their cases for bigger cylinders with some regularity, doing it at the factory level (boring the initial cylinder hole smaller than the 1199's) would be easy, I'd think.

They don't unless you use the same engine case for two different engines, which ducati regularly does.

that's why the M400 weighs more than the M600.

The point is that if ducati is going to make a superquad 750, they need to have a different engine case (same one with smaller holes) so the jugs can maintain the same wall thickness and get a weight advantage.
Logged

Check out my oil filter forensics thread!                     Offended? Click here
"Yelling out of cars, turning your speakers out the window to blast your music onto the street, setting off M-80 firecrackers, firing automatic weapons into the air—these are all well and good. But none of them create a merry atmosphere of insouciance and bonhomie quite like a revving motorcycle.
rac3r
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 73



« Reply #373 on: November 06, 2011, 04:15:59 PM »

Some leaked pics before the launch later today











Can't wait for the official release for better pictures!
Logged
junior varsity
loves ze desmodromics.
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7355


GT1k, 99 M900(V), 98 M900(W), 00 M900S, 02 748E/R


« Reply #374 on: November 06, 2011, 04:20:29 PM »

+1... Fairings look goofy to me at first glance.  Excited to see official pictures and pricing for N.A. 
Logged

Pages: 1 ... 23 24 [25] 26 27 28   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.1.1