Ducati Monster Forum

powered by:

January 08, 2025, 12:25:04 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Tapatalk users...click me
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  



Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: ducati 696 or street triple??  (Read 4854 times)
shank80
New Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 22


« on: June 17, 2008, 06:01:00 AM »

HI all ducatisti....
greetings galore!!!
i am Shashank......call me shank. melting in this hot sun of qatar i am  about to get my very first 600 cc bike. my research has ultimately boiled down to 2........ street triple or the ducati 696. my basic purpose would be urban and occasional track. have been on both bikes. love both. (....just cant make a choice). since this is a ducati forum, i am ready to hear all crap about the street triple. so anyone? pls talk me out. tech details will be appreciated. i am basically looking for comparison in ride quality, handling, engine heat issues( since 696 is air cooled), oil consumption issues(read striple has some), ride on bumpy roads, cost of accessories.......
looking forward for a positive and honest response.
cheers
« Last Edit: June 17, 2008, 06:07:07 AM by shank80 » Logged
Punx Clever
It never got strange enough for my
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1447



« Reply #1 on: June 17, 2008, 07:02:29 AM »

Looks aside...  I dont like the 696 because when I sat on it, my boys were smashed up against the tank cause the seat sloped downward.  That was enough to convince me to spend the extra money on an s2r

my $0.02
Logged

2008 S2R 1000 - Archangel

The Edge... there is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over.  - HST
ArguZ
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 422



WWW
« Reply #2 on: June 17, 2008, 07:07:30 AM »

So you want positive response ?
Cool !
Get a 695 and be sure to have a classic, great looking, mod happy bike
If you CAN get a Street Triple I would def. prefer that over the 696.
So it comes down to Class, Hooliganism or Metrosexuality  cheeky
Logged
fLUNX
New Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 22


« Reply #3 on: June 17, 2008, 07:31:51 AM »

I´m also with that doubt...
But I don t understand why Ducati/Monster boys are so against to "changes"...
I think that finally Ducati refresh his monster... I hope that the others will follow.

That´s is called Evolution...  waytogo

regards,
fLAVIO
Logged
shank80
New Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 22


« Reply #4 on: June 17, 2008, 07:44:54 AM »

hi guys,
never really did expect that from the ducati site.
but like flunx said it......evolution will take time to settle in.
personally, i did like the front, engine, tank, wheels being my fav.......but was a tad disappointed on the OEM exhaust cans and the sloping seat. i just need some more info on the engine heat (being air cooled). does it really burn ur thighs on a hot sunny day??
Logged
Dareduc
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 146


« Reply #5 on: June 17, 2008, 08:15:20 AM »

QUTAR!!!!! I can tell you this. whatever you get... don't get Black. it will burn every time you hope on... that being said. I would go with a white 696 or white triple. I think the 696 tank will conduct less heat because it is plastic. (sorry if I am incorrect on this ) I sat on one and liked the riding position, and it seems a little more solid then the previous generation ( as far as likely hood to breakdown) but i don't know how mod friendly the 696 is going to be
Logged
Bill in OKC
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 897


S4Rs


« Reply #6 on: June 17, 2008, 10:23:10 AM »

The Street Triple would be my choice of the two.  See if you can snag test rides on each one to be sure.  The triples here are all sold before our dealer even gets them so it might be hard to buy one unless you get in line.
Logged

'07 S4Rs  '02 RSVR  '75 GT550  '13 FXSB  '74 H1E  '71 CB750
the ron
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 287


pseodohollageniccoumpoundcianigin


« Reply #7 on: June 17, 2008, 04:12:02 PM »

street triple, 696 is hane-   vomit

the ron Evil
Logged

" If you were directly above him, then how did you see him?"
"...... Because i was inverted."
707soldier
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 474


Combat Soldier Inc.


WWW
« Reply #8 on: June 17, 2008, 04:21:12 PM »

Test ride both and see for yourself what you like. I did and bought the 696.
No regrets, loving every minute of it. Good Luck with you search.
Logged

Ducati _______
Speed Triple 1050 sold
Daytona 675 SE sold
Dark Monster 696 sold

Live for nothing, Die for something.

"To really live, you must almost die, To those who fight for it,
Life and freedom have a meaning that the protected will never know"
mattyvas
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5263


I've become an old man on an old man's bike


WWW
« Reply #9 on: June 17, 2008, 04:36:39 PM »

It would be a tough choice, i'd have a foot in either camp.
They are both mod friendly with a good list of factory add-on bits.
As for being air cooled and burning you well that's tough. I have never found mine runs hotter than 113c
And I never felt any heat rising, being naked it just escapes without issue.

What I like about mine is that riding it is easy, I never feel like I have to keep it wound up to have fun.
I can be going slow-ish in top gear and not have to come down to third to get going.
Effort is minimal to make you  Grin haven't ridden a ST as yet so I can't give you in put on that.
But everything I have read says it's a wheelie machine at heart.

Good luck choosing, but I know I'd still choose a Ducati. Once you have one you can never have another again (brand)

cheers
Matty...
Logged

eviltwin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 165


eurotrash


« Reply #10 on: June 17, 2008, 04:41:59 PM »

street triple, 696 is hane-   vomit

the ron Evil

Wow, you never give up do you? 

I'd say buy the 696 just to piss "the guy" off.   Roll Eyes

There was a good amount of + & - feedback in this thread.  I own one and like it a lot.  I commited to it before the 696 was available and didn't get a chance to ride the monster either.  Good luck with your search, either way you'll have a good time riding. waytogo
http://ducatimonsterforum.org/index.php?topic=4448.0
Logged

We are 138
JoDuc
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 113


07 S2R1K


« Reply #11 on: June 17, 2008, 05:09:25 PM »

street triple, 696 is hane-   vomit

the ron Evil

I'm with 'the ron' here..... Street Triple
Logged
slowrider
New Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 17


« Reply #12 on: June 17, 2008, 06:40:33 PM »

Not sure if it would influence your decision...but check the insurance rates.  I checked the rates between the monster and the street triple...and the triumph was 4 times the price to insure.

-Craig
Logged
Ohmic
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 266



WWW
« Reply #13 on: June 17, 2008, 06:57:46 PM »

I never thought i would hear myself say this. Ever! I mean i LOVE Ducati. I've always recommended the brand to new riders.

696.... St 3?

Hands down! GET THE TRIPLE.
Logged

'It's NOT a Harley... It's a Ducati!'

Bike#1: 2002 Ducati MH900e #1801
Bike#2: 2006 Ducati Monster S2R1000
Bike#3: 2006 Ducati Sport1000
Bike#4: 2008 Ducati HyperMotard 1100
eviltwin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 165


eurotrash


« Reply #14 on: June 17, 2008, 07:53:53 PM »

Not sure if it would influence your decision...but check the insurance rates.  I checked the rates between the monster and the street triple...and the triumph was 4 times the price to insure.

-Craig

Funny you mention that...  When I added my Street Triple, I had just the one car and with the multi car discount included, my 6mo premium went up by just $18.  It didn't seem right but I asked her to repeat herself, and I didn't push it any further than that.  I think most ins companies go mainly off of CCs, and there isn't enough of a history on either bike to give it a negative rating. 
Logged

We are 138
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.1.1