Ducati Monster Forum

powered by:

February 15, 2025, 02:29:42 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Tapatalk users...click me
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  



Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 696 Termignoni slipons - Baffles in or out?  (Read 4567 times)
theprocess
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 116


'09 M696


« on: July 13, 2011, 08:27:28 PM »

Ive noticed that with the baffles in my 696's throttle is a lot smoother below 4k rpm and less backfiring/popping. When i had them off it didnt like being under 4k rpm, shook pretty badly at times and backfired whenever I let off the throttle. Bonus, my neighbors will hate me a little less because of the noise reduction  waytogo. All things considered, I think the baffles are staying in permanently (taking them out in the first place was a real p.i.t.a. also).

Anyone know if Ducati/Termignoni set the ecu for use with baffles or without or either? Wondering if there is any difference in performance.
Logged
Raux
Guest
« Reply #1 on: July 13, 2011, 09:25:03 PM »

i find that interesting, because essentially wiht the closed loop system, they both should work perfect below 4k as the system should compensate due to the O2 sensors...
Logged
ungeheuer
ɹǝʌO d∩ uıɐןɐɹʇsn∀
Local Moderator
Post Whore
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 20828


Often wrong. Never in doubt.


WWW
« Reply #2 on: July 14, 2011, 03:01:01 AM »

I find it interesting because I detected absolutely zero performance difference baffles in or baffles out when I had Termi slip ons on my 696.  The only thing that changed was the noise level.  I think the popping on decel is the same, its just way more audible with the baffles removed.
Logged

Ducati 1100S Monster Ducati 1260ST Multistrada + Moto Guzzi Griso 1200SE


Previously: Ducati1200SMultistradaDucatiMonster696DucatiSD900MotoMorini31/2
WhiteStripe
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 352


Monster Addiction


« Reply #3 on: July 14, 2011, 12:50:11 PM »

I am running Arrows on a FAT DUC.  Without baffles I needed to richen it up substantially, with baffles was pretty similar to stock to get same results.  This is definitely unscientific, but my experience. YMMV.

For me, without baffles was just too loud for daily commuting.
Logged

2006 S2R 1000, Arrow CF exhaust, FatDuc 02, CF open cc with stock pp
Duc796canada
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 302

My first Ducati and road bike!


« Reply #4 on: July 14, 2011, 01:11:34 PM »

I am running Arrows on a FAT DUC.  Without baffles I needed to richen it up substantially, with baffles was pretty similar to stock to get same results.  This is definitely unscientific, but my experience. YMMV.

For me, without baffles was just too loud for daily commuting.

Makes sense. With the baffles out, one has significantly less back pressure, probably a little less engine braking as well. I'm glad you brought it up, with mixture adjustments, there will be a difference, slight, but nonetheless. Now if someone can do a dyno run, it would be awesome. As far as the noise, I put mine back in as well, my neighbours are good people, don't need them being otherwise. There is a Harley owner that likes to rev it on weekends or whenever he feels like listening to it echo through the townhouse complex, I know how people feel about him. Dolph
« Last Edit: July 14, 2011, 01:14:22 PM by Duc796canada » Logged

796 Red Monster(sans ABS)
Viz-Tec Supabrake II
15/41 gearing(AFAM quick change sprocket)
PC V, NEXTUP QS.
2006 Suzuki GSXR 600 track bike(I know...not a Duc...some day)
theprocess
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 116


'09 M696


« Reply #5 on: July 16, 2011, 03:11:27 PM »

Its been a couple of days now of riding with the baffles in, maybe its just me experience but my bike no longer has the low rpm shakes. Without the baffles, making right handers was always very sketchy...now rolling on the throttle is silky smooth. Major difference.
Logged
DoWorkSon
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 458



« Reply #6 on: July 17, 2011, 08:48:24 AM »

For what it's worth I have zero decel pop after installing a baffle in my h-comp exhaust... Might be a benefit of having a baffle
Logged

2003 BMW R1150GS- The commuter
2009 M696--SOLD
WhiteStripe
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 352


Monster Addiction


« Reply #7 on: July 19, 2011, 05:15:35 AM »

Its been a couple of days now of riding with the baffles in, maybe its just me experience but my bike no longer has the low rpm shakes. Without the baffles, making right handers was always very sketchy...now rolling on the throttle is silky smooth. Major difference.

100% agree.  Trade offs.  WOT no baffles is great.  Commuting i went back to more back pressure less noise.
Logged

2006 S2R 1000, Arrow CF exhaust, FatDuc 02, CF open cc with stock pp
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.1.1