New vs. S*R Monster design, two years later

February 12, 2025, 01:55:25 AM

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

News: No Registration with MSN emails

Home

Help

Discussion Boards

Introduce Yourself
FAQs and Policies

General Monster Forum
Remembering our friends...in Memorium
Riding Techniques
Tutorials
Tech
Accessories & Mods
Gear
Racing & Trackdays
Stolen Motorcycles

No Moto Content
Board Tech Issues

Local Club Boards
BOMb
RCP

Sponsors

Valley Desmo Service
California Cycleworks
MotorcycleGear.Com
Monsterparts
Minor Sponsor Board
Sponsor Info

Flea Market

Monsters for Sale
Monsters Wanted
Other Bikes
Parts for Sale
Parts Wanted
Gear for Sale
Misc for Sale/Wanted

Ducati Monster Forum > Moto Board > General Monster Forum (Moderators: ducpainter, bigiain, Speeddog) > New vs. S*R Monster design, two years later

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6 Go Down

« previous next »

Author

Topic: New vs. S*R Monster design, two years later (Read 20264 times)

hillbillypolack

Sr. Member

Offline

Posts: 470

New vs. S*R Monster design, two years later

« on: July 18, 2011, 05:21:18 PM »

The 'new' version of the Monster has been on the road for what, two years now? I'm just curious to hear from the masses how you think its aged, and if you prefer it to the previous Monster (S*R versions).

Just a gut level check, which one you prefer, looks only. Of course feel free to sprinkle in any other technical details which you feel add to the choice. (i.e., the 696 riding position vs. the S*R)


	Logged

jsd2

Full Member

Offline

Posts: 130

Re: New vs. S*R Monster design, two years later

« Reply #1 on: July 18, 2011, 06:31:18 PM »

The new Monsters are what got me back into motorcycling (there were some other factors) so obviously I have a soft spot for them. I do however love all Monsters. I am about to buy a Monster EVO and I am selling the 696. I think the new generation are great bikes. I don't have much experience with the older bikes. I know a lot of people think you can only like one or the other but I disagree. Whether people like it or not Ducati had to update the Monster sooner or later and that meant they were going to change. I would rather have the new Monster compared to the older Monsters but I certainly can appreciate the older generations. From some of the other posts I've read in the past I would guess you are going to get some pretty heated answers on this thread.

Jim


	Logged

ungeheuer

ɹǝʌO d∩ uıɐןɐɹʇsn∀
Local Moderator
Post Whore

Offline

Posts: 20826

Often wrong. Never in doubt.

Re: New vs. S*R Monster design, two years later

« Reply #2 on: July 18, 2011, 06:43:29 PM »

Quote from: jsd2 on July 18, 2011, 06:31:18 PM

I know a lot of people think you can only like one or the other but I disagree.... ....I would rather have the new Monster compared to the older Monsters but I certainly can appreciate the older generations. From some of the other posts I've read in the past I would guess you are going to get some pretty heated answers on this thread.

Completely agree waytogo

.

Anyone seen Kopfjäger lately? Wink


	Logged

Ducati 1100S Monster + Ducati 1260ST Multistrada + Moto Guzzi Griso 1200SE

Previously: Ducati1200SMultistradaDucatiMonster696DucatiSD900MotoMorini31/2

kopfjäger

Post Whore

Offline

Posts: 33157

Feral 859

Re: New vs. S*R Monster design, two years later

« Reply #3 on: July 18, 2011, 06:50:34 PM »

Quote from: ungeheuer on July 18, 2011, 06:43:29 PM

Completely agree waytogo

.

Anyone seen Kopfjäger lately? Wink

Let me get a couple beers in me and I'll be back. Cheesy


	Logged

“Woohoohoohoo! Two personal records! For breath holding and number of sharks shot in the frickin\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

d3vi@nt

Hero Member

Offline

Posts: 916

Re: New vs. S*R Monster design, two years later

« Reply #4 on: July 18, 2011, 06:51:36 PM »

I don't dislike the new Monsters -I like the seemingly more aggressive stance and some of the other styling updates. However, I don't like all the added plastics. To me it seems a departure from the whole raw, naked look. That said, I haven't actually ridden any of the newer models, which might cause me to overlook aesthetics all together.


	Logged

'13 MTS GT
'99 ST2
'07 M695 - Sold

Hero Member

Offline

Posts: 2658

Re: New vs. S*R Monster design, two years later

« Reply #5 on: July 18, 2011, 07:41:59 PM »

aesthetically? I love the s*r monsters, my favorite being the red w white racing stripe, white wheels. But I've also grown to really like the new ones - red/red, white with red frame and especially Corse skins.
my $0.02

Quote from: ungeheuer on July 18, 2011, 06:43:29 PM

Completely agree waytogo

.

Anyone seen Kopfjäger lately? Wink


	Logged

Quote from: The Bacon Junkie on November 08, 2011, 09:32:47 PM

It was great meeting "The Dude" at long last. She brought us some epic beer.

krolik

Hero Member

Offline

Posts: 4251

Yeah, that's me. So what.

Re: New vs. S*R Monster design, two years later

« Reply #6 on: July 18, 2011, 08:20:08 PM »

I have an '03 M800, but I do like the looks of the new Monsters. Unfortunately the only new one that I have ridden, M1100 Evo, it didn't fit me. Cry


	Logged

'03 M800 "not so dark" Dark, Remus high pipes, Cycle Cat clipons & frame sliders, CRG lanesplitter mirrors, Sargent seat, tail chop, Nichols flywheel, modified & powdercoated rearsets, 15/44 gearing, 520 chain & sprockets, TPO Beast pod filters, Power Comander III. 72.95 Rear Wheel HP & 54.29 ft-lbs!

Quote from: SacDuc

No. I'm a different type of idiot altogether.

kopfjäger

Post Whore

Offline

Posts: 33157

Feral 859

Re: New vs. S*R Monster design, two years later

« Reply #7 on: July 18, 2011, 08:30:41 PM »

I'll start with the S*R Monster, (not an older Monster) with it's hideous SSS and piece of shit plastic tank (which by reading the tank thread, is an ongoing, never ending problem), the beginning of the end. Wink


	Logged

ducatiz

No trellis. no desmo. = Not Ducati.
Post Whore

Offline

Posts: 15591

Re: New vs. S*R Monster design, two years later

« Reply #8 on: July 18, 2011, 08:45:10 PM »

LOL, I've owned plenty of Ducatis, but never an older (pre S*R) monster. My first Monster was the '05 S2R and except for the tank BS, I love it. The later ones aren't hideous to me.. Then again, I'm kind of a motorcycle slut, I can find something I like about almost any bike.

My next bike will probably be an S4. I've wanted one for ages, but I've simply got to get more floor space in the garage first.


	Logged

Check out my oil filter forensics thread! Offended? Click here
"Yelling out of cars, turning your speakers out the window to blast your music onto the street, setting off M-80 firecrackers, firing automatic weapons into the air—these are all well and good. But none of them create a merry atmosphere of insouciance and bonhomie quite like a revving motorcycle.

Pedro-bot

Hero Member

Offline

Posts: 1788

Re: New vs. S*R Monster design, two years later

« Reply #9 on: July 18, 2011, 08:46:23 PM »

Quote from: kopfjäger on July 18, 2011, 08:30:41 PM

Basically what kopf(make the beast with two backsed up a)ger is saying is:
OLD SCHOOL. FTW!


	Logged

1999 M750 AKA Little Blue Monster, 2002 S4, 2006 Sport 1000, 2008 Sport 1000, 2005 749s, 2018 R NineT Urban GS

kopfjäger

Post Whore

Offline

Posts: 33157

Feral 859

Re: New vs. S*R Monster design, two years later

« Reply #10 on: July 18, 2011, 09:03:59 PM »

Quote from: Pedro-bot on July 18, 2011, 08:46:23 PM

Basically what kopf(make the beast with two backsed up a)ger is saying is:
OLD SCHOOL. FTW!

Hey.....what the....son of a a..... Cheesy


	Logged

Raux

Guest

Re: New vs. S*R Monster design, two years later

« Reply #11 on: July 18, 2011, 09:05:39 PM »

well... pureness wise. The original superbike frame Monster is as pure as it gets. BUT the worst handling
The watercooled... while exceptional powerwise... too cluttered to be the clean pure monster
The MH900e-like S*R swingarms... too gimicky and I'm pretty sure as a result of the failure of the 999 DSS
The plastic tanks... bang head

a decent idea that went horribly wrong with this damn foodfuel
The new monster... especially the 696, closer to the original with updates for modern style, but yes too much plastic for the true nakedness just needed a few changes.