Ducati Monster Forum

powered by:

February 11, 2025, 10:08:44 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: No Registration with MSN emails
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  



Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 1100 EVO Claimed 100HP ???  (Read 8517 times)
Mau
New Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 43


« on: September 12, 2011, 10:44:30 AM »

Hi all,
I am the new owner of a 1100 EVO and even when I like the bike a lot, I can't avoid being dissapointed by its performance.  I know it is a 2V air cooled engine......but I was expecting a little more power as the advertising claimed 100 HP.

The latest Motorcycle-usa dyno test put out almost 87HP...however, another user reported only 83HP on his test.  Regardless the differences, I would call it and 85......not quite the 100HP Ducati claims.

How can Ducati get away with something like that?

I think the 796 outs about 78HP.
Logged
arai_speed
Guest
« Reply #1 on: September 12, 2011, 10:51:02 AM »

Crank vs. Rear Wheel output.
Logged
Mau
New Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 43


« Reply #2 on: September 12, 2011, 11:04:45 AM »

Thanks Arai, I understand.

Here is an explanaition I found:

Crank HP vs. True Rear Wheel HP
That's a tough one - and LONG....
The short?
Take crank HP, subtract 14.6% (please don't email me and ask - I won't answer - search SAE and old Yamaha), take that, and subtract around 10% to 15% and you'll get about True HP at rear wheel.
The actual formula contains a curve for power loss through gears and  there SHOULD be another curve for power lost in a tire (it's the majority of loss on a motorcycle....
Remember, too - that you are only likely to get a crank number from the manufacturer and that's probably a "good" one that the marketing department is providing... (sound of blowing up a marketing and sales balloon? :-)  That's not everybody - but it has happened - leaving names out! :-)


This formula yields about 76HP for the EVO......

Now I know...... Huh?
Logged
Slide Panda
Omnipotent Potentate
Post Whore
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 10137


Personal Pretext


« Reply #3 on: September 12, 2011, 11:20:10 AM »

Historically Ducs loose about 10% from the crank to the wheel. The first 848s folks tested were rated at 130bhp and put down 117 at the wheel - exactly a 10% loss.

So you can roughly assume you'll be getting around 90 on that 1100.

Numbers can vary from dyno to dyno and by atmospheric conditions, ambient temps etc etc. I know my 900 feels a lot more gutty on a cool fall afternoon than a hot humid summer day
Logged

-Throttle's on the right, so are the brakes.  Good luck.
- '00 M900S with all the farkles
- '08 KTM 690 StupidMoto
- '07 Triumph 675 Track bike.
Spidey
Crashin' mofo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4842



« Reply #4 on: September 12, 2011, 11:25:31 AM »

Are you coming from an I-4?  If so, 100 HP on the 2V aircooled twin feels really different b/c of the powerband.  If you're used to a top-end rush (which makes the bike feel fast and powerful), you're not gonna get it.  And because the powerband is relatively flat in comparison, you'll go fast on the Duc from low revs w/o realizing it.  

That said, it's not 100 RWHP. 
Logged

Occasionally AFM #702  My stuff:  The M1000SS, a mashed r6, Vino 125, the Blonde, some rugrats, yuppie cage, child molester van, bourbon.
bikepilot
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 994



« Reply #5 on: September 12, 2011, 11:30:19 AM »

Most all MFG's publish very optimistic HP figures.  You didn't think the BMW and Kawasaki 100cc liter bikes really made 200hp to the wheel or that the Buell's make 103 hp now did ya?  

Ducati used to be more realistic, but some time ago they figured out that it just made them look bad when squids compared numbers, so now their degree of optimism is bested only by Buell I think (buell claimed 103hp from a motor that'll do 80 flat on a dyno).

SP, most dyno operators apply an SAE correction factor which more or less takes into account temp, altitude etc.  They sometimes don't when its a dyno day and they are doing a ton of them though.
Logged

2009 XB12XT
2006 Monster 620 (wife's)
1997 TL1000S
1975 Kawasaki H1 Mach III
2001 CR250R (CO do-it-all bike)
2000 XR650R (dez racer)
2003 KX100 (wife's)
1994 DR250SE (wife's/my city commuter)
Duc Buz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 134


Bad Cop, No Duc


« Reply #6 on: September 12, 2011, 01:30:06 PM »

Much like "claimed weights".  You really see this in the bicycle world, very generous.
Logged

11B4P (Ret) US Army
2003 620 Dark (Matte Silver)
Hellraising-vtec
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 158



« Reply #7 on: September 12, 2011, 06:37:41 PM »

I have an Evo and would love more top end power. Something about it topping at 130mph also depresses me. I love the bike but I still think it lacks some power
Logged
Buckethead
I have a little tiny cape that fits on my
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5989



« Reply #8 on: September 12, 2011, 08:07:25 PM »

I have an Evo and would love more top end power. Something about it topping at 130mph also depresses me. I love the bike but I still think it lacks some power


Damn, do I wish I could afford a 130 mph speeding ticket and the corresponding bump in my insurance prices.

Also, you DO realize that Ducati speedometers are notorious for being, um, "optimistic," yes?

 coffee
Logged

I can't wait until Marquez gets on his level and makes Jorge trip on his tampon string. 
Speeddog
West Valley Flatlander
Flounder-Administrator
Post Whore
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14813


RIP Nicky


« Reply #9 on: September 12, 2011, 08:17:44 PM »

My **** is rated at a claimed 12".
(If I start measuring at my belt).

It happens across all the manufacturers.
I worked for Yamaha in the 80's and 90's.
The 'claimed dry weight' of the bikes was always about 10% low.
Logged

- - - - - Valley Desmo Service - - - - -
Reseda, CA

(951) 640-8908


~~~ "We've rearranged the deck chairs, refilled the champagne glasses, and the band sounds great. This is fine." - Alberto Puig ~~~
Ohm3d
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 192



« Reply #10 on: September 12, 2011, 08:23:10 PM »

Ducati speedometers are notorious for being, um, "optimistic," yes?


+1 LOL  chug
Logged
Mau
New Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 43


« Reply #11 on: September 14, 2011, 08:33:47 AM »

Thanks for all the comments.  

Yes, I always had I4s and remember my 600cc sport bikes would be much faster.  Nevertheless, today I am over the speed rush I had 10 years ago and the Monster's power seems just enough to be fun while keeping me safe.  Dolph

BTW...What's the best way to increase the monster's HP?
« Last Edit: September 14, 2011, 08:35:25 AM by Mau » Logged
thought
Everyone needs a
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2366



« Reply #12 on: September 14, 2011, 12:44:12 PM »

BTW...What's the best way to increase the monster's HP?

http://www.ducati.com/news/streetfighter_848/2011/09/12/2251/index.do

 Tongue
Logged

'10 SFS 1098
'11 M796 ABS - Sold
'05 SV650N - Sold
SDRider
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 534


Pregnant Dogin'


« Reply #13 on: September 14, 2011, 08:56:42 PM »

Thanks for all the comments.  

Yes, I always had I4s and remember my 600cc sport bikes would be much faster.  Nevertheless, today I am over the speed rush I had 10 years ago and the Monster's power seems just enough to be fun while keeping me safe.  Dolph

BTW...What's the best way to increase the monster's HP?

Logged

2014 Ducati Multistrada 1200 S
2012 Ducati Monster 1100 EVO (sold)
Raux
Guest
« Reply #14 on: September 14, 2011, 09:04:00 PM »

Port and Polish,Hugh compression pistons, Termi full exhaust with DP ECU, Powercommander V,
lightweight crank, rods, flywheel, wheels
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.1.1