|
hillbillypolack
|
 |
« Reply #150 on: January 19, 2012, 06:55:17 PM » |
|
Dyno result??
Looks like there's a big hole in the midrange compared to the 1198. It makes the numbers up top (shifting the power / rpm relationship) but the 1198 looks like it brings the power at lower revs unless I'm reading this wrong.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Raux
Guest
|
|
« Reply #151 on: January 19, 2012, 09:32:34 PM » |
|
Looks like a jap bike power band
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Lars D
|
|
« Reply #152 on: January 20, 2012, 01:03:42 AM » |
|
Is that at the wheel?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Raux
Guest
|
|
« Reply #153 on: January 20, 2012, 01:44:19 AM » |
|
pretty certain that's at the crank.
just relooking at it... the 1198 looks pretty strong comparably all the way through 8250 rpm.
and still hangs up to 9500 rpm.
it's all at the top end where the panigale would pull away.
1000 rpm higher upper limit as well
it's gonna have to be ridden like the I-4 bikes and keep it up in the RPM range to make the power.
then again, makes it more docile at the lower RPMs for street
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
stopintime
|
|
« Reply #154 on: January 20, 2012, 02:11:50 AM » |
|
The lower rpm torque on the Panigale suffer a lot - anything lower than 7,000 has less than my 800 Monster  I think a Termi kit and ECU is more required than ever. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
252,000 km/seventeen years - loving it
|
|
|
|
DRKWNG
|
|
« Reply #155 on: January 20, 2012, 02:22:15 AM » |
|
pretty certain that's at the crank.
You think? Pretty sure the 1198 puts out more than 130 at the crank. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
And the sugar fountain fairy swore so hard when she came to super-size that stale hope soybean; liiiike a homeless German woman. Who is this super-sizing spirit-crushing femme? And tell her I'll break a tree root up in her shrimp.
Being faster than you thought possible…it feels good. No, screw that—it feels like shotgunning a gallon of adrenaline and chasing it with an all-night orgy aboard a burning Viking boat.
|
|
|
|
stopintime
|
|
« Reply #156 on: January 20, 2012, 02:23:27 AM » |
|
You think? Pretty sure the 1198 puts out more than 130 at the crank.
You're reading the torque axis. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
252,000 km/seventeen years - loving it
|
|
|
|
DRKWNG
|
|
« Reply #157 on: January 20, 2012, 02:25:19 AM » |
|
HA!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
And the sugar fountain fairy swore so hard when she came to super-size that stale hope soybean; liiiike a homeless German woman. Who is this super-sizing spirit-crushing femme? And tell her I'll break a tree root up in her shrimp.
Being faster than you thought possible…it feels good. No, screw that—it feels like shotgunning a gallon of adrenaline and chasing it with an all-night orgy aboard a burning Viking boat.
|
|
|
|
Raux
Guest
|
|
« Reply #158 on: January 20, 2012, 03:31:56 AM » |
|
The lower rpm torque on the Panigale suffer a lot - anything lower than 7,000 has less than my 800 Monster I think a Termi kit and ECU is more required than ever. are your numbers at the rear wheel or crank? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
stopintime
|
|
« Reply #159 on: January 20, 2012, 04:01:44 AM » |
|
are your numbers at the rear wheel or crank?
In my head  Like the ones posted here I suppose, at the crank. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
252,000 km/seventeen years - loving it
|
|
|
MadDuck
The anti-
Hero Member
 Offline
Posts: 6589
All the Ducati's made the 1290SDR possible!
|
|
« Reply #160 on: January 20, 2012, 08:46:29 AM » |
|
Call me crazy but after looking at that graph I actually like the 1198 numbers more than the 1199.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
No modification goes unpunished. Memento mori. Good people drink good beer. Things happen pretty fast at high speeds.
It's all up to your will level, your thrill level and your skill level. Everything else is just fluff.
|
|
|
|
Raux
Guest
|
|
« Reply #161 on: January 20, 2012, 09:46:33 AM » |
|
Call me crazy but after looking at that graph I actually like the 1198 numbers more than the 1199.
Compare to an BMW S1000 at the wheel  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
muskrat
|
|
« Reply #162 on: January 20, 2012, 09:50:06 AM » |
|
now that's a nice curve.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Can we thin the gene pool?
2015 MTS 1200
09 Electra Glide
|
|
|
|
IdZer0
|
|
« Reply #163 on: January 20, 2012, 10:16:15 AM » |
|
Something ain't right; how can a 1000 make 15% more torque than a 1200? According to the Akropovic site (same as the S1000RR graph) the 1198 makes 120 Nm torque:  I guess that means we can't compare the graphs. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 20, 2012, 10:22:38 AM by IdZer0 »
|
Logged
|
2007 Monster 695, DP ECU, Low mount Alu Termignonis
replaced by 2011 848 EVO
|
|
|
|
stopintime
|
|
« Reply #164 on: January 20, 2012, 10:21:40 AM » |
|
Something ain't right; how can a 1000 make 15% more torque than a 1200?
It's hard to see, but I think the BMW numbers are Nm and the Panigale is footpounds. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
252,000 km/seventeen years - loving it
|
|
|
|
