Ducati Monster Forum

powered by:

February 06, 2025, 10:53:57 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Please Help
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  



Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: S$RS vs 1100s vs 1100 evo  (Read 7732 times)
Rigez
New Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 42


« on: December 05, 2011, 05:57:19 PM »

For those of you that have riden all 3. Comments, things you like or don't like and which one you would choose to stay with after riding all 3. Asking because I'm looking to switch from the 696....fun but, not enough power.
Logged
Frisco
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 186



« Reply #1 on: December 05, 2011, 08:46:25 PM »

I just bought an S4RS but had ridden and 1100 (no S) but it really didn't matter because 1) I didn't like the seating position for me (felt like I kept sliding forward which can be "fixed") and 2) I don't like looking forward and not seeing anything out in front (no wheel, fender, etc.) - Just my preference. I LOVE the power/acceleration on the S4RS but to be honest it's really hard to make a decision about performance until you take one for a 50-75 mile test ride and get used to it first before pusing it at all. Find someone to lend you one of each (hard to do) and go ride with them and see.
just my 2 cents
Logged

2007 S4RS
The Bacon Junkie
I have a Bacon Wrapped
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9851


Save the brass...


« Reply #2 on: December 05, 2011, 09:32:39 PM »

Get the S4RS.





 Evil




 bacon
Logged

I only see jesus having a sauna with a teletubbie.
I find it disturbing that you're imagining me in a sauna, never mind the teletubbie aspect of it

Save the Brass...
muskrat
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8335



« Reply #3 on: December 05, 2011, 10:30:08 PM »

Are you concerned about maintenance? If not the s4r.   Loads of fun
Logged

Can we thin the gene pool? 

2015 MTS 1200
09 Electra Glide
dan_t
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 233



« Reply #4 on: December 06, 2011, 02:51:36 AM »

Put simply, they're VERY different bikes.

One's a 2 valve, air cooled beast that will feel like it's just coming on to power when, Uh, you have to change gear.

The other's a 4 valve 'monster' that'll rev out to 10,500 rpm and has way more power than you will really need, unless you are on a track, and well skilled, and like to be scared shitless.....  cheeky

By the way, I did ride the 1100S & an S4rs.

I bought the S4rs.

Enough said.
Logged

'08 S4rs;
Termis, DP C/F Short Tail, DP C/F Rear Hugger, Custom hand-made seat, Matris Steering damper, Pazzo Shorty Levers, Rizoma Dynamic mirrors, EVR Ventilated Pressure Plate, EVR Open Clutch Cover, SpeedyMoto Stainless Springs Kit, EVR Clutch Slave Cylinder, EVR Front Sprocket Cover, Evotech Performance Radiator & Oil Cooler Guards, Rizoma CT027R, CT017R & CT015R red fluid reservoirs, Powder Coated Rear Passenger Pegs, Oberon Racing Pegs, C/F Fairing stays, Oggy Knobs, ZG tinted Screen
stopintime
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9063


S2R 800 '07


« Reply #5 on: December 06, 2011, 04:13:17 AM »

S4RS has it's peak torque at 7,500 rpm
Both 1100 has theirs at 6,000 rpm

...... and it's the same torque!


This means that the 1100 will match/beat the S4RS up to 7,500

From there the 1100 won't be able to keep up.

If you're able to use all that high rev power, I'm sure the S4RS will make you smile.
To me, it just feels stressful to 'have to' flog a bike over 8,000 revs in order to get my moneys worth.
Logged

252,000 km/seventeen years - loving it
The Bacon Junkie
I have a Bacon Wrapped
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9851


Save the brass...


« Reply #6 on: December 06, 2011, 06:51:43 AM »

It doesn't feel like "flogging" to me over 8,000rpm...

The motor pulls like gangbusters from 4,000rpm up to 7,500rpm...

...and then it just takes off above that!  Evil Grin Dolph

The reason I say it doesn't feel like I'm flogging it, is the motor doesn't really get tired or run out of breath.  It just keeps pulling right into the rev limiter @ 10,500rpm.

Plus, the S4RS is just a way prettier bike than the new style Monsters IMHO. 




bacon
Logged

I only see jesus having a sauna with a teletubbie.
I find it disturbing that you're imagining me in a sauna, never mind the teletubbie aspect of it

Save the Brass...
thought
Everyone needs a
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2366



« Reply #7 on: December 06, 2011, 07:49:35 AM »

the way i see it, btwn 2v and 4v its the choice between power vs character.  the 2v's have way more character than the 4v's and support a more relaxed way of riding, but the 4v's are a lot smoother and have way more power.

also keep in mind that the 4v maintenance is literally 2x the price of the 2v's.

and btwn the evo vs the 1100s... it's a total toss up.  the evo has way more safety features and the s has ohlins bling.  unless you reall plan on tracking the bike, the evo prob has a slight edge.  the dtc/abs/slight hp increase will prob be more useful on a everyday basis than the suspension.

also keep in mind that the seat and risers are totally different from the evo and the 1100s.  the evo is a lot more comfortable with a flatter seat and higher risers.
Logged

'10 SFS 1098
'11 M796 ABS - Sold
'05 SV650N - Sold
Case S2R
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 80


« Reply #8 on: December 06, 2011, 08:37:01 AM »

I have done short rides on a S4R and 1100S.  They are both monsters and you can not make a wrong choice, it is personal preference.

For the street the 2 valve is glorious, up to 100 mph don't expect a HUGE difference in speed.  On the track the 4 valve is my preference but not in a Monster Chassis.  Looks wise I think a S4Rs (white with red frame) is about as good as it gets.  Each are plenty fast for the road.

I would decide based on your preference for--Looks, Maintenance, and power.

Case
Logged
Case S2R
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 80


« Reply #9 on: December 06, 2011, 08:43:49 AM »

Also note that depending on the year of your S4R you may have to Caswell your replacement tank.  Not a big deal, but know it is coming.

FYI--The new monster may not be 100% impervious either so it could be a wash.

Case
Logged
CDawg
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1468

S4RS


« Reply #10 on: December 06, 2011, 11:39:46 AM »

If you're able to use all that high rev power, I'm sure the S4RS will make you smile.
To me, it just feels stressful to 'have to' flog a bike over 8,000 revs in order to get my moneys worth.

No flogging required.  The engine on my S4RS LOVEs reving over 6500.  It's easier (smoother, quicker, more torque-y) going from 6500 to redline then to go from 0 to 4000 RPM.  The top end power is very usable.
Logged
Frisco
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 186



« Reply #11 on: December 06, 2011, 07:48:26 PM »


If you're able to use all that high rev power, I'm sure the S4RS will make you smile.
To me, it just feels stressful to 'have to' flog a bike over 8,000 revs in order to get my moneys worth.

Mine has never felt like it was being flogged - I've run high revs into corners and out and also gently cruised thru between 4-5,000 rpms - actually anything around 3-4,000 feels like it is bogging.
Logged

2007 S4RS
EvilSteve
not so evil, not so steve
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 179



WWW
« Reply #12 on: December 07, 2011, 08:17:43 PM »

I've owned the S4RS and currently own an M1100EVO. I'd go the evo given the choice. Ideal would be a SF848S w/ ABS.

Summary for me is the S4RS has great power (had race ECU, open airbox and exbox on mine) and sounds amazing. It also has the bling factor. The EVO handles a lot better than the S4RS IMO. I say I want the SF848/S because I'd prefer a smaller/lighter(?) bike with a bit more power that also handles well.

I can't speak to the M1100S but that would have been a really difficult choice if it'd been an option. I'd probably have gone for the M1100S over the EVO if it had ABS. Mostly because of the dry clutch.
Logged

2011 M796
Moronic
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 336


07 S4Rs


« Reply #13 on: December 08, 2011, 07:54:36 AM »

S4RS has it's peak torque at 7,500 rpm
Both 1100 has theirs at 6,000 rpm

...... and it's the same torque!


This means that the 1100 will match/beat the S4RS up to 7,500


Hmm, I was going to say that the S4Rs would surge ahead shortly past 6000, but having chased up relevant dyno charts, maybe not.

Here are the curves (sorry, couldn't find same source for both but hope these close enough).

1100 EVO:



And the S4Rs - torque first, green curve is stock:



And now power:



The 1100 really does look as good as the stock 4Rs all the way to 7500, with more down low from the extra 100cc.

By 8K tho, the stock 4Rs is doing another 10hp.

And the red curves, DP ECU and Termis, tell a better story again.


Sources: Evo, Motocycle USA; S4RS, Bike Boy



« Last Edit: December 08, 2011, 08:01:13 AM by Moronic » Logged

HunS4RS
New Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 32



« Reply #14 on: December 12, 2011, 09:43:28 AM »

I owned an s4rs. I rode a 1100evo for about 10 minutes and thought the riding position, felt like you sat over the forks felt weird. No thanks on the evo. Found a beautiful s4rs for sale with only 4k on the clock, called the dealer and had to wait for the new tank. When I  arrived at the dealer we talked about the 1100 EVO. He mentioned that a 10 min ride would'nt be long enough to make a good decesion. I rode both and yes, the s4rs has more top end, but it's heavy, a sexy beast but compared to the EVO, a tank. To my surprise I bought the EVO, and every time I ride it , I love it!!
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.1.1