Ducati Monster Forum

powered by:

February 05, 2025, 06:07:11 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Please Help
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  



Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Is it wise for couple's with kids ....?  (Read 12985 times)
PhilB
Scruffy Duc
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 177



« Reply #60 on: July 10, 2012, 12:06:45 PM »

I had butter on my waffles this morning.
Yes, but did you eat them alone, or did you irresponsibly eat them with your wife, at the same time, thus risking orphaning your children with simultaneous heart attacks?  Huh?  DID YOU?

Cheesy

PhilB
Logged

1993 Ducati M900 Monster "Patina" (203,000 miles, so far) -- 1995 Ducati M900 (wife's bike) -- 1972 Honda CB450 (daughter's bike) -- 1979 Vespa P200 (daughter's scoot) -- 1967 Alfa Romeo GT Jr. (1300cc) -- 1964 Vespa GS160 (160cc 2-stroke) -- 1962 Maicoletta scooter (275cc 2-stroke) -- 1960 Heinkel Tourist 103A1 scooter "Elroy" (175cc 4-stroke)
pitbull
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 840



« Reply #61 on: July 15, 2012, 06:06:46 AM »

Getting run over from behind is a highly preventable occurrence.  Watch your mirrors and have an escape route.

Direct causal? Not sure I agree, the whole thread is about mitigating risk no?

As for accidents,  I don't buy the term unless and act of God/nature. As far as I'm concerned the impetus remains on the biker not to become a statistic, meaning I still put the blame on the rider even if technical "fault" is on someone else.  But that strays from the point of the discussion.

Some - riding separate means both still ride and removes that couple from the hypocrisy.

While I agree with much of what you said, the simple truth is the same accident in a car produces much different consequences on a motorcycle. For that reason a motorcycle ride is simply an ineherently risky event, even with all prevention and riding focus being utilized.

I'm not saying couples with children are irresponsible for choosing to ride, but I would say those couple who decide not to have a perfectly justified reason for making that decision.
Logged

01 monster 900ie cromo, 01 ST4
krolik
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4250


Yeah, that's me. So what.


WWW
« Reply #62 on: July 15, 2012, 09:36:13 AM »

I had butter on my waffles this morning.

You're probsbly dead by now. Grin
Logged

'03 M800 "not so dark" Dark, Remus high pipes, Cycle Cat clipons & frame sliders, CRG lanesplitter mirrors, Sargent seat, tail chop, Nichols flywheel, modified & powdercoated rearsets, 15/44 gearing, 520 chain & sprockets, TPO Beast pod filters, Power Comander III. 72.95 Rear Wheel HP & 54.29 ft-lbs!

Quote from: SacDuc
No. I'm a different type of idiot altogether.
Kev M
Italian Bike Nut
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 660



« Reply #63 on: July 16, 2012, 06:53:52 AM »

While I agree with much of what you said, the simple truth is the same accident in a car produces much different consequences on a motorcycle. For that reason a motorcycle ride is simply an ineherently risky event, even with all prevention and riding focus being utilized.


Well of course, but so are the results of a plane crashing or a ski lift falling to the ground or divers being left in the open sea by their dive boat... thing is, you play the odds. And though none of those things are completely unpreventable, none are particularly likely. Same is true with being fatally rear ended on a bike, ESPECIALLY if you're diligent.

But what do I know, I've only been riding some 20 years and more than a couple hundred thousand miles.  Wink


I'm not saying couples with children are irresponsible for choosing to ride, but I would say those couple who decide not to have a perfectly justified reason for making that decision.


I find "perfectly justified" a patently ridiculous risk analysis, especially from a motorcyclist. Kinda like the time I was selling a Jeep with ski racks and the buyers didn't want them because "they would never do something reckless like that." But it takes all kinds I guess.


Don't get me wrong, to each his own, but I'm free to roll my eyes at the ultra conservatives no?
Logged

Current Fleet

18 Guzzi V7III
16 FLHP (Police RK)
13 Guzzi V7
11 M696
Popeye the Sailor
For $50 you can touch my
Post Whore
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 16580



« Reply #64 on: July 16, 2012, 07:48:23 AM »

I had butter on my waffles this morning.

Was it your anniversary or your birthday?
Logged

If the state had not cut funding for the mental institutions, this project could never have happened.
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.1.1