powered by:
November 05, 2024, 08:30:08 PM
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News
:
Tapatalk users...click me
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
Discussion Boards
Introduce Yourself
FAQs and Policies
General Monster Forum
Remembering our friends...in Memorium
Riding Techniques
Tutorials
Tech
Accessories & Mods
Gear
Racing & Trackdays
Stolen Motorcycles
No Moto Content
Board Tech Issues
Local Club Boards
BOMb
RCP
Sponsors
Valley Desmo Service
California Cycleworks
MotorcycleGear.Com
Monsterparts
Minor Sponsor Board
Sponsor Info
Flea Market
Monsters for Sale
Monsters Wanted
Other Bikes
Parts for Sale
Parts Wanted
Gear for Sale
Misc for Sale/Wanted
Ducati Monster Forum
>
Moto Board
>
Accessories & Mods
(Moderators:
Drunken Monkey
,
mitt
) >
Truckers Monster Rebuild
Pages:
1
...
13
14
[
15
]
16
17
...
57
Go Down
« previous
next »
Print
Author
Topic: Truckers Monster Rebuild (Read 300601 times)
ducatiz
No trellis. no desmo. = Not Ducati.
Post Whore
Offline
Posts: 15590
Re: Truckers Monster Rebuild
«
Reply #210 on:
August 28, 2010, 05:23:17 AM »
Here is how Ducati did it on the Pantah:
Frame member right next to the belt cover: if the tube wasn't flattened, it would be about 2mm IN the belt cover. (click thumbnails for full size)
Logged
Check out my oil filter forensics thread!
Offended? Click here
"Yelling out of cars, turning your speakers out the window to blast your music onto the street, setting off M-80 firecrackers, firing automatic weapons into the air—these are all well and good. But none of them create a merry atmosphere of insouciance and bonhomie quite like a revving motorcycle.
hadesducati848
your sisters love my
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 829
1998 R1 (sold) 2009 848
Re: Truckers Monster Rebuild
«
Reply #211 on:
August 28, 2010, 08:57:49 AM »
thats pretty ingenious. i would never have thought to do that to the frame, for fear of compromising the the integrity of the tube its self. but if ducati engineers think that its ok then who am i to say differently
Logged
it is so much easier to get forgiveness then it will ever be to get permission.
truckinduc
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 695
Re: Truckers Monster Rebuild
«
Reply #212 on:
August 29, 2010, 06:20:54 AM »
Quote from: ducatiz on August 28, 2010, 05:23:17 AM
Here is how Ducati did it on the Pantah:
Frame member right next to the belt cover: if the tube wasn't flattened, it would be about 2mm IN the belt cover. (click thumbnails for full size)
Hey thanks alot for the pictures. It almost seems like a mistake or an afterthought though. Or the frame guys and engine guys didnt get together enough pre production.
Thats the simplest option and most likely what ill do, although it will only be a very small area compared to the pantah frame.
Logged
truckinduc
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 695
Re: Truckers Monster Rebuild
«
Reply #213 on:
August 29, 2010, 06:25:20 AM »
Quote from: Düb Lüv on August 28, 2010, 04:08:21 AM
this reminds me of the frameless ducati roadbike. very very neat stuff.
Yep, its VERY similar to they way the d16rr and desmosedichi's (sp) rear suspension. Honda did it first with the rc211v and then the 600rr and 1000rr. It apparently upsets the chassis less while leaned over on a less than smooth surface.
I want to have the first monster with that style rear suspension. Its hard to be original these days.
Logged
ducatiz
No trellis. no desmo. = Not Ducati.
Post Whore
Offline
Posts: 15590
Re: Truckers Monster Rebuild
«
Reply #214 on:
August 29, 2010, 06:31:20 AM »
Quote from: truckinduc on August 29, 2010, 06:20:54 AM
Hey thanks alot for the pictures. It almost seems like a mistake or an afterthought though. Or the frame guys and engine guys didnt get together enough pre production.
Thats the simplest option and most likely what ill do, although it will only be a very small area compared to the pantah frame.
That's a good question, and probably true.
However, they had 12 years to figure it out -- that frame is from an Alazzurra, which is just a last-generation Pantah rebadged by Cagiva. The frames on the first Pantah 500s are nearly identical.
I think they were trying to make the frame as thin as possible, which is a selling point of the L-twin layout.
Logged
Check out my oil filter forensics thread!
Offended? Click here
"Yelling out of cars, turning your speakers out the window to blast your music onto the street, setting off M-80 firecrackers, firing automatic weapons into the air—these are all well and good. But none of them create a merry atmosphere of insouciance and bonhomie quite like a revving motorcycle.
Düb Lüv
ASE master internet mechanic
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 989
Re: Truckers Monster Rebuild
«
Reply #215 on:
August 29, 2010, 09:30:08 AM »
Quote from: truckinduc on August 29, 2010, 06:25:20 AM
Yep, its VERY similar to they way the d16rr and desmosedichi's (sp) rear suspension. Honda did it first with the rc211v and then the 600rr and 1000rr. It apparently upsets the chassis less while leaned over on a less than smooth surface.
I want to have the first monster with that style rear suspension. Its hard to be original these days.
i didn't know your suspension design was close to the frameless design. your frame work reminded of how the frame and engine are mounted. the frame being in 2 pieces and how the engine is holding everything together. amazingly simplifying the monster's design even more.
Logged
Building, building, building
truckinduc
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 695
Re: Truckers Monster Rebuild
«
Reply #216 on:
August 29, 2010, 11:41:17 AM »
I can't quote from this blackberry but that seems very logical. I can't stand to ride inline 4's due to their width.
Logged
truckinduc
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 695
Re: Truckers Monster Rebuild
«
Reply #217 on:
August 29, 2010, 11:48:52 AM »
My frame is very similar to the ducati supermono frame, Although the rear suspension configuration is different. In stock configuration the engine is a stressed member. In my version it also is, just in a different way. I'm joining the frame and swingarm pivot to eliminate a lot of unnecessary forces through the rear of the case since I'm removing so much material.
Logged
Düb Lüv
ASE master internet mechanic
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 989
Re: Truckers Monster Rebuild
«
Reply #218 on:
August 29, 2010, 12:07:54 PM »
sorry truckin, i meant you're amazingly simplifying the monster's design even more. having the trellis swingarm cleans up the profile of the bike sooooo much. very nice and inspiring work.
Logged
Building, building, building
truckinduc
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 695
Re: Truckers Monster Rebuild
«
Reply #219 on:
August 29, 2010, 01:21:11 PM »
In my opinion ducati's "frame-less" patent is anything but frame less. I see a separate frame for the front suspension and a frame for the rear suspension, only they are not connected.
An actual fraimless bike to me is the v1000.
Logged
truckinduc
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 695
Re: Truckers Monster Rebuild
«
Reply #220 on:
August 31, 2010, 06:33:39 PM »
worked on the eccentrics more today
tomorrow they go on a diet.
Also got the motor jig complete for the front end.
Logged
truckinduc
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 695
Re: Truckers Monster Rebuild
«
Reply #221 on:
September 01, 2010, 06:30:46 PM »
finished the eccentrics today. they look good and are very light weight. too bad I cant use them. Oh well they will at least work for mockup and the swingarm jig. 3 days of work down the drain.
Logged
TAftonomos
is without a monster :(
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2482
Re: Truckers Monster Rebuild
«
Reply #222 on:
September 01, 2010, 06:44:34 PM »
And you can't use them because....
Logged
MyDucParts.com
My Ebay Store - Ducati and more!
truckinduc
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 695
Re: Truckers Monster Rebuild
«
Reply #223 on:
September 02, 2010, 08:05:28 AM »
take a look at the pictures and see if you can figure out why I cannot use them.
hint, first pic.
Logged
ducatiz
No trellis. no desmo. = Not Ducati.
Post Whore
Offline
Posts: 15590
Re: Truckers Monster Rebuild
«
Reply #224 on:
September 02, 2010, 08:20:43 AM »
Quote from: truckinduc on September 02, 2010, 08:05:28 AM
take a look at the pictures and see if you can figure out why I cannot use them.
hint, first pic.
ahhhh.. you instibated the circular confabulator and the modular kreason has too much heptalagular radius...
man.. sorry.
Logged
Check out my oil filter forensics thread!
Offended? Click here
"Yelling out of cars, turning your speakers out the window to blast your music onto the street, setting off M-80 firecrackers, firing automatic weapons into the air—these are all well and good. But none of them create a merry atmosphere of insouciance and bonhomie quite like a revving motorcycle.
Pages:
1
...
13
14
[
15
]
16
17
...
57
Go Up
Print
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Introductions
-----------------------------
=> Introduce Yourself
=> FAQs and Board Policies
-----------------------------
Moto Board
-----------------------------
=> General Monster Forum
=> In Memorium...Remembering our Friends
=> Riding Techniques
=> Tutorials
=> Tech
=> Accessories & Mods
=> Gear
=> Racing & Trackdays
=> Stolen Motorcycles
=> Random Cool Pics
-----------------------------
Kitchen Sink
-----------------------------
=> No Moto Content
===> Board Suggestions
===> Fixed Board Issues
=> Stella's Pop
-----------------------------
DMF Sponsors
-----------------------------
=> Valley Desmo Service
=> Ca-Cycleworks
=> New Enough.Com
=> Monsterparts
=> Minor Sponsors
=> Misc Info
-----------------------------
Local Clubs
-----------------------------
=> Monster Women
=> Ducati MOB
=> SoCal Monsters
=> CAM
=> OZ monsters
=> NorthWest
=> NEMHA
=> NYMMC
=> MHM
=> SoCO DOG
=> DFWM
=> MADDOG
=> MOCHA
=> THCM
=> AZDRA
=> M-ROC
=> Central Cal Monsters
=> DOCSF
=> MCMC
=> DDCM
=> DOCTOR
=> Hoosier Hooligans
=> OMHA
=> DOCIA
=> Rising Sun Ducatis
=> MCM
=> NMMR
=> MIA
=> Desmotropic
=> COW
=> MOTH
=> DesmOK
=> Bayou Country Ducati Riders
=> DeVal Mostro
=> Coastal Ducati Club
-----------------------------
Configurators and Calculators
-----------------------------
=> Valve Shim Calculator
Loading...
SimplePortal 2.1.1