Kev, only guessing because I still haven't ridden one: Scrambler has a 796 engine detuned ~ 10 BHP but geared down to compensate, so it ought to feel much more torquey than a 696 (which is already geared lower than an M796.
On paper should have enough brakes because the front is 1/2 a SBK brake. Dual sport tire and 18" rather than 17". Might feel almost as nimble as the bar might have more leverage?
Note that the fork is a 41mm, not a 43mm. She'll have to ride it. Throttle will probably improve with break-in but will take 1,500+ miles. My M796 did. Scrambler only has one throttle body vs two on the M796, part of the detuning possibly.
Yeah, that's what I was thinking on paper at least (and though I hadn't noticed the fork diameter differences, I doubt it matters much at this size/weight bike - hell my nearly 600# Sportster is wearing 39mm forks).
But here are some specs (mostly from MCN, but I don't have their Scrambler test handy for the braking spec so that one is from CW which might be hard to compare to the other two from MCN, but it looks realistic):
M696 vs. Scrambler vs. M796
Wet Weight: 408# / 410# / 415#
RWHP: 67 / 70 / 76
Torque: 44 / 47 / 51
1/4 mile: 12.21 /
11.91* / 11.97
Braking 60-0: 119.5' / 123' / 117.4'
* I think you might be right on the gearing, and that probably explains the standing 1/4 mile too.