Ducati Monster Forum

Moto Board => Racing & Trackdays => Topic started by: Spidey on December 19, 2010, 08:54:16 AM



Title: Run what you brung
Post by: Spidey on December 19, 2010, 08:54:16 AM
While I'm really skeptical about it happening, this would be cool . . .

http://www.motorcycle.com/events/world-moto-clash-preannounced-90224.html (http://www.motorcycle.com/events/world-moto-clash-preannounced-90224.html)


Title: Re: Run what you brung
Post by: stopintime on December 19, 2010, 11:30:29 AM
I'll buy that DVD to me and everyone I know  8) [moto]


Title: Re: Run what you brung
Post by: fastwin on December 19, 2010, 02:01:15 PM
Yeah, hate to be a buzz kill but I don't see this happening. Entertaining? Sure. But I still say the economy is going to cramp his idea. Timing's not right. Not sure if it ever would be. Sounds like he's been sitting around the den smoking too much pot coming up with wild ideas. [laugh] Guess we'll find out. I wish him luck. 


Title: Re: Run what you brung
Post by: Turf on December 19, 2010, 06:56:37 PM
want this in my life

It sounds like what I've hoped GP would be for the longest time, a true prototype race series


Title: Re: Run what you brung
Post by: fastwin on December 19, 2010, 08:42:58 PM
Am I dreaming in colors here or didn't the WERA have an unlimited/Formula USA type class similar to this years ago?

I found this:

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0300762/ (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0300762/)



Title: Re: Run what you brung
Post by: zooom on December 20, 2010, 04:53:08 AM
all I can say is....color me interested...at the very least...his idea has wet some palette's and appetites for sure...

now...Barber doesn't seem like a very good track for this for machines that'll be "faster than a MotoGP machine"...so what track(s) does that leave?....personally, nothing against Miller(which seems like it'd be worth seriously considering) but it lacks the undulations and landscape features that also highlight some of the spectacular things motorcycles do with their pilots, like the drop into the corkscrew at Laguna or Lukey Heights at Philip Island or the turn 1 cambered 1st gear turn at Nurburgring or any of the other wonderful examples we can all come up with....


Title: Re: Run what you brung
Post by: ducatiz on December 20, 2010, 05:12:50 AM
it will be as much dumb luck as it is design

certainly they'll try to design bikes/use designs that are good for the track.

I am thinking an NOx modded GP09 bike would be nice..  turn advantages over heavier setups with turbo/supercharging and a big kick for the straights.


Title: Re: Run what you brung
Post by: Cider on December 20, 2010, 08:05:19 AM
He claims he could build a bike faster than a MotoGP bike for $100k.  I'm not so sure about that actually--depends on the definition of "faster," I guess.

Overall, the article reminds me of Moller, the guy that shows up in the media every few years claiming he's on the cusp of producing affordable flying cars for everybody.  The no-holds-barred idea is everybody's fantasy, but when I got to the part about 3D movies with Ridley Scott (from Blade Runner?) directing, I thought: "dang, another scam."  I'm surprised he didn't mention some tie-in with Justin Bieber, Apple, and Facebook as well.


Title: Re: Run what you brung
Post by: ducatiz on December 20, 2010, 08:10:55 AM
He claims he could build a bike faster than a MotoGP bike for $100k.  I'm not so sure about that actually--depends on the definition of "faster," I guess.

i could too, but it wouldn't have any cornering capability.. it's all relative.


Title: Re: Run what you brung
Post by: Triple J on December 20, 2010, 08:32:04 AM
Sounds cool...

...but I'm skeptical. The claim that a MotoGP bike wouldn't be fast enough is assinine IMO. NOS, Turbo, Superchargers, etc. all seem silly when current GP bikes top 200 mph and can pull wheelies or spin up the rear in every gear. Nevermind the lean angles they can also achieve.

Since this would be a road race I don't see anything being faster than a GP bike...they have way too much R&D into them, the best suspension, brakes, tires, electronics, etc. I don't see how an all new machine with limited development time could match them...or even come close.


Title: Re: Run what you brung
Post by: MadDuck on December 20, 2010, 08:34:46 AM
It this really happens it should be big time fun!


Title: Re: Run what you brung
Post by: zooom on December 20, 2010, 08:43:27 AM
It this really happens it should be big time fun!

YEAH, in a veritable wild west/gold rush/cannonball run kind of motorcycle racing way....


Title: Re: Run what you brung
Post by: zooom on December 20, 2010, 08:44:15 AM
ya know what...Imma enter this with a rocket propelled bike....fugg em all!...


Title: Re: Run what you brung
Post by: duccarlos on December 20, 2010, 09:10:57 AM
1000cc GP bikes will be faster.


Title: Re: Run what you brung
Post by: fastwin on December 20, 2010, 04:05:31 PM
I love the Justin Bieber remark! [laugh] Maybe he can get Paris Hilton to sponsor a team or be the head umbrella girl coordinator!! ;D That would be hawt!! [thumbsdown]


Title: Re: Run what you brung
Post by: triangleforge on December 21, 2010, 09:25:57 AM
Sounds like fun -- I'd probably watch the race if it was on TV for free and I didn't have anything better to do that day. And I've got to hand it to him for thinking big -- for two to four motorcycle races a year to become "the biggest thing on the planet" on their chosen weekends is certainly ambitious. Maybe it can follow some of the models Crane mentioned -- for example, the Kentucky Derby keeps drawing attention even as interest in horse racing generally withers away.

The problem I see is that the basic concept behind the race (races?) is way too focused on the motors, and hardly at all on the other things that make a motorcycle go fast or that make any racing series interesting to me -- most notably the riders/drivers.

Smarter people than me have noted already in this thread that a stronger motor doesn't automatically mean a faster race bike, and if you start digging into the electronics packages in ways that aren't currently legal in MotoGP (say, using GPS to tailor the engine management & traction control to specific corners), you're going to blow through that "I can make a faster bike for $100,000" boast faster than a turbo 'Busa through a school zone.

But ignoring the rider in the whole equation is what's going to limit my interest in this whole enterprise, and I suspect I'm not alone. How many people are there in the world that can handle - much less excel on -- a +250hp bike that's -300 lbs? OK, from that very limited pool how many of those aren't currently under binding, exclusive contract to MotoGP, AMA, BSB, or WSBK? If you have a bunch of identical-looking munchkins you've never heard of in leathers & helmets then I find it a whole lot harder to care who's winning and losing. It'll be mediocre racing with lots of carnage and no real story line from weekend to weekend.

The one thing this concept has going for it is the reality show aspect, because it crosses a line that no other show (so far) has dared to cross: for the first time, we'll have reality TV where someone (or a whole bunch of someones) is pretty well guaranteed to die, or at least suffer terrible, life-changing, pathos-infused injuries. I'd bet that would sell. Just not to me.


Title: Re: Run what you brung
Post by: derby on December 21, 2010, 10:17:50 AM

The problem I see is that the basic concept behind the race (races?) is way too focused on the motors, and hardly at all on the other things that make a motorcycle go fast or that make any racing series interesting to me -- most notably the riders/drivers.


the original ama formula xtreme concept was much like this. an "anything goes" class that brought out some interesting bikes (an r7/r1 hybrid, a big-motored, non-hayabusa gsxr, a big cbr w/ f1 tech in the motor... i think there were some exotics in there, at some point).

it was interesting to watch because the bikes were just brutal... sliding all over the splace. it was really a spectacle.

it was also interesting to see some of the younger riders take a shot on a high horsepower bike. coincidentally enough, some even went to fx as a stepping stone to superbikes.

fwiw, the rider is always going to be a factor. the limiting aspect of all these bikes is going to be tire technology and how well the rider can manage his traction budget.


Title: Re: Run what you brung
Post by: fastwin on December 21, 2010, 10:52:07 AM
That's the way I remember that class. What goes around comes around. ABC Wide World of Sports had the Superbikers all those many years ago... today we have SuperMoto. The original big bike WERA's Formula USA... today, this guy's idea. Nothing really new here. Other than the reality TV angle.


Title: Re: Run what you brung
Post by: mitt on December 21, 2010, 12:20:43 PM
“For $100,000, I can build a bike that’s faster than any MotoGP bike,” Crane claimed


Just quoting it again for future reference   ;D


mitt


Title: Re: Run what you brung
Post by: Spidey on December 21, 2010, 12:35:33 PM
Unless the series takes place on tracks that are just a series of racetracks, I don't think it'll be primarily focused on motors at all.   

I think a hopped-up and well-sorted WSBK bike would be the way to go.  The problem with GP bikes is that you can't ride point n' shoot b/c they need high cornering speed for grip and to keep pace.  And you can't pass on one.  So anyone riding a WSBK liter-bike with a lot of low-end grunt is gonna be able to hold a GP bike at bay.   And since the most important thing will be electronics to keep the power down, a one-off bike likely won't have a sufficiently well-developed engine to do it.  Then again, maybe allowing unlimited fuel capacity on the GP bikes, along with removal of the min weight limits would give them the grunt to compete.  

That $100k line is BS unless he's talkin' in a straight line.  


Title: Re: Run what you brung
Post by: fastwin on December 21, 2010, 02:22:45 PM
On a semi related topic to the last post. Has anyone bothered to compare or keep record of actual race lap times (not qualy) at tracks where both WSBK and MotoGP compete? Like Phillip Island, etc. Of course you'd need to find two races at the same track where the weather conditions were similar. Not 40 degrees, 50 mph wind gusts and pissing rain on Rossi & Co. and then 80 degrees, sunny and no wind for Biaggi & friends. Just curious in general and to see how these thoughts and ideas that have been mentioned would play out in this run what you brung class.


Title: Re: Run what you brung
Post by: El Matador on December 21, 2010, 02:27:44 PM
“For $100,000, I can build a bike that’s faster than any MotoGP bike,” Crane claimed


Just quoting it again for future reference   ;D


mitt

Step 1: buy a used 50K desmo

Step 2: spend 8k on race exhaust and ecu

Step 3 : 10K nitrous system

Step 4 : 10 K in bodywork and tuning

There you go, faster than a. MotoGp , sub 100 k and you have 22k left for umbrella girls and hookers

In all seriousness, this sounds awesome, in a Speed Racer -half-the-field-dies Awesome

I'd give my left nut to watch it. Not to mention participate. I'm just the kind of touched-in-the-head that this sport requires. Now all I need is the skill


Title: Re: Run what you brung
Post by: ducpainter on December 21, 2010, 02:32:56 PM
<snip>

I'd give my left nut to watch it. Not to mention participate. I'm just the kind of touched-in-the-head that this sport requires. Now all I need is the skill
...not to mention 100 large.


Title: Re: Run what you brung
Post by: El Matador on December 21, 2010, 02:35:10 PM
...not to mention 100 large.

This, my friend, is why god gave us two kidneys and a liver that functions perfectly when halved.


Title: Re: Run what you brung
Post by: Spidey on December 21, 2010, 02:36:31 PM
On a semi related topic to the last post. Has anyone bothered to compare or keep record of actual race lap times (not qualy) at tracks where both WSBK and MotoGP compete? Like Phillip Island, etc. Of course you'd need to find two races at the same track where the weather conditions were similar. Not 40 degrees, 50 mph wind gusts and pissing rain on Rossi & Co. and then 80 degrees, sunny and no wind for Biaggi & friends. Just curious in general and to see how these thoughts and ideas that have been mentioned would play out in this run what you brung class.

I *think* the WSBK bikes are a bit less than 2 seconds back.  Unless it's a zuke, in which case it was like 0.3 second.  

Edit:  here's the article I was thinking of.   I dunno if they had the same temp conditions.  And they certainly didn't have the same level of riders.  I'd never compare Toseland/Crutchlow to Rossi/Lorenzo http://www.crash.net/motogp/news/161068/1/assen_motogp_v_wsbk.html (http://www.crash.net/motogp/news/161068/1/assen_motogp_v_wsbk.html)


Title: Re: Run what you brung
Post by: mitt on December 21, 2010, 02:43:18 PM
Step 1: buy a used 50K desmo

Step 2: spend 8k on race exhaust and ecu

Step 3 : 10K nitrous system

Step 4 : 10 K in bodywork and tuning

There you go, faster than a. MotoGp , sub 100 k and you have 22k left for umbrella girls and hookers

In all seriousness, this sounds awesome, in a Speed Racer -half-the-field-dies Awesome

I'd give my left nut to watch it. Not to mention participate. I'm just the kind of touched-in-the-head that this sport requires. Now all I need is the skill

Wow - you should work as a race engineer if it is that easy and cheap.

mitt


Title: Re: Run what you brung
Post by: Spidey on December 21, 2010, 02:45:12 PM
Step 1: buy a used 50K desmo

Step 2: spend 8k on race exhaust and ecu

Step 3 : 10K nitrous system

Step 4 : 10 K in bodywork and tuning

There you go, faster than a. MotoGp , sub 100 k and you have 22k left for umbrella girls and hookers

In all seriousness, this sounds awesome, in a Speed Racer -half-the-field-dies Awesome

I'd give my left nut to watch it. Not to mention participate. I'm just the kind of touched-in-the-head that this sport requires. Now all I need is the skill

Desmos came race ECUs and exhausts.  $8k more hookers n' blow for us!!!!  [thumbsup]


Title: Re: Run what you brung
Post by: ducpainter on December 21, 2010, 02:49:00 PM
This, my friend, is why god gave us two kidneys and a liver that functions perfectly when halved.
You don't suppose you could get the going price for kidneys raised...

my liver isn't worth anything other than something for doctors to point at and say...

see...we told you so. ;)


Title: Re: Run what you brung
Post by: El Matador on December 21, 2010, 02:51:41 PM
Wow - you should work as a race engineer if it is that easy and cheap.

mitt

Faster in a straight line , yes, right up until the piston goes through the tank, kinda why I added the "in all seriousness" afterwards [thumbsup]

And , I kinda do wanna work as a race engineer.
Desmos came race ECUs and exhausts.  $8k more hookers n' blow for us!!!!  [thumbsup]

Not with the optional MotoGp spec one that went for a cool 8k  [beer]


Title: Re: Run what you brung
Post by: derby on December 21, 2010, 03:03:01 PM
I *think* the WSBK bikes are a bit less than 2 seconds back.  Unless it's a zuke, in which case it was like 0.3 second.  

Edit:  here's the article I was thinking of.   I dunno if they had the same temp conditions.  And they certainly didn't have the same level of riders.  I'd never compare Toseland/Crutchlow to Rossi/Lorenzo http://www.crash.net/motogp/news/161068/1/assen_motogp_v_wsbk.html (http://www.crash.net/motogp/news/161068/1/assen_motogp_v_wsbk.html)

they also didn't have the same spec of tire.


Title: Re: Run what you brung
Post by: Spidey on December 21, 2010, 03:11:10 PM
Good point.


Title: Re: Run what you brung
Post by: Drunken Monkey on December 21, 2010, 05:34:47 PM
Just out of curiosity, is there a requirement that the rider be human?

Never mind... I think I've said too much.




(Monkey riding rocket-powered pocket bike FTW!)



SimplePortal 2.1.1