Title: "Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does" Post by: Rudemouthsky on March 19, 2014, 07:39:22 PM Petty I know, but it sounds much better. And now you can smugly correct someone. :)
http://www.topspeed.com/cars/car-news/correction-audi-does-not-own-ducati-lamborghini-does-ar133326.html (http://www.topspeed.com/cars/car-news/correction-audi-does-not-own-ducati-lamborghini-does-ar133326.html) Title: Re: Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does Post by: hbliam on March 19, 2014, 09:25:31 PM I guess VW actually owns all of them. Blech [puke]
Title: Re: Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does Post by: Rudemouthsky on March 20, 2014, 04:55:46 AM I guess VW actually owns all of them. Blech [puke] Yeah I kinda feel the same way. No offense to German engineering or anything but I had no idea VW was so monstrously huge...sucks when everything on earth is owned by a handful of mega corps and the Italian bikes we love aren't even really Italian. Title: Re: Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does Post by: Kev M on March 20, 2014, 05:27:52 AM Taco Bell was the only restaurant to survive the franchise wars, now all restaurants are Taco Bell
Now All Restaurants are Taco Bell.flv (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFiDoOgRTpk#) Title: Re: Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does Post by: Rudemouthsky on March 20, 2014, 06:11:25 AM Taco Bell was the only restaurant to survive the franchise wars, now all restaurants are Taco Bell Now All Restaurants are Taco Bell.flv (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFiDoOgRTpk#) [laugh] That shit's almost true. One day WalMart will own everything and there will be "Great Value" brand motorcycles [puke] Title: Re: Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does Post by: Skybarney on March 20, 2014, 07:22:59 AM Can't tell ya how happy I am to have accidentally bought a 2013 Evo 1100. It is the only year of that bike and the last of a great brand.
Here is a fun thought, there is no way in hell I would own a Ferrari or a Lamborghini. Both are simply not well suited for real world driving and both are out of their element anywhere but a racetrack or showing off at some party somewhere. VW? They make nice enough cars but the better models are IMO overpriced as hell for something with a VW badge. I would drive an Audi as they make some really nice drivable road cars. Luckily I do not have to commute to work anywhere other than to my launch site and that being a whopping five miles from home I have no problem driving my ram 2500 when I need it. When I want to do a road trip I rent cars. Then I can thrash the crap out of them, wear out the tires and still get better mileage than my truck. Oh and so much for Ducati being the Ferrari of Motorcycles....... Bummer as "The Lamborghini of motorcycles" is simply complicated sounding. Title: Re: Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does Post by: Whiskey on March 20, 2014, 08:05:50 AM Petty I know, but it sounds much better. And now you can smugly correct someone. :) http://www.topspeed.com/cars/car-news/correction-audi-does-not-own-ducati-lamborghini-does-ar133326.html (http://www.topspeed.com/cars/car-news/correction-audi-does-not-own-ducati-lamborghini-does-ar133326.html) ...Audi owns Lamborghini. Sorry to break it to you. Title: Re: Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does Post by: NAKID on March 20, 2014, 08:14:55 AM ...Audi owns Lamborghini. Sorry to break it to you. And VW owns Audi... Title: Re: Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does Post by: Scooter Montgomery on March 20, 2014, 08:45:58 AM And VW owns Audi... And I own a VW, so I think that means I own Ducati. Title: Re: Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does Post by: NAKID on March 20, 2014, 09:22:35 AM And I own a VW, so I think that means I own A Ducati. Fixed... Title: Re: Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does Post by: Statler on March 20, 2014, 10:54:18 AM Can't tell ya how happy I am to have accidentally bought a 2013 Evo 1100. It is the only year of that bike and the last of a great brand. Here is a fun thought, there is no way in hell I would own a Ferrari or a Lamborghini. Both are simply not well suited for real world driving and both are out of their element anywhere but a racetrack or showing off at some party somewhere. VW? They make nice enough cars but the better models are IMO overpriced as hell for something with a VW badge. I would drive an Audi as they make some really nice drivable road cars. Luckily I do not have to commute to work anywhere other than to my launch site and that being a whopping five miles from home I have no problem driving my ram 2500 when I need it. When I want to do a road trip I rent cars. Then I can thrash the crap out of them, wear out the tires and still get better mileage than my truck. Oh and so much for Ducati being the Ferrari of Motorcycles....... Bummer as "The Lamborghini of motorcycles" is simply complicated sounding. How many Ferraris have you driven? Title: Re: Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does Post by: Skybarney on March 20, 2014, 11:01:43 AM I have only driven one. That being said it would be a Sunday track toy, not something I would drive around town. Unless of course I was single and unattractive then I would need one badly.
You do know the old joke about Corvettes? You only see two kinds of people driving Corvettes, hot blondes and ugly men. [cheeky] Title: Re: Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does Post by: Statler on March 20, 2014, 11:27:32 AM ;D
Title: Re: Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does Post by: Rudemouthsky on March 20, 2014, 12:29:16 PM ...Audi owns Lamborghini. Sorry to break it to you. Damn bro you really busted my bubble! :P Title: Re: Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does Post by: Rudemouthsky on March 20, 2014, 12:30:28 PM I have only driven one. That being said it would be a Sunday track toy, not something I would drive around town. Unless of course I was single and unattractive then I would need one badly. You do know the old joke about Corvettes? You only see two kinds of people driving Corvettes, hot blondes and ugly men. [cheeky] Soooo true ^^^^ :D Title: Re: Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does Post by: ungeheuer on March 20, 2014, 01:38:35 PM ;D :o It lives ;DTitle: Re: Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does Post by: Statler on March 20, 2014, 02:35:02 PM :o It lives ;D It's been a little busy. :-\ When we get the other house sold and the major service done on the old ferrari and the belts done on the bikes and I don't have to go testify before the State senate and the throttle cables replaced on the boat and the work contracts done and permits for the office acquired and various other first world problems about which I have no right at all to complain, things will settle down and I'll be around more. [thumbsup] Life is good, folks. Ride hard. On your Audi-owned monsters. Title: Re: Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does Post by: ducpainter on March 20, 2014, 02:45:20 PM It's been a little busy. :-\ All I hear is...When we get the other house sold and the major service done on the old ferrari and the belts done on the bikes and I don't have to go testify before the State senate and the throttle cables replaced on the boat and the work contracts done and permits for the office acquired and various other first world problems about which I have no right at all to complain, things will settle down and I'll be around more. [thumbsup] Life is good, folks. Ride hard. On your Audi-owned monsters. blah...blah...blah. :-* [laugh] Title: Re: Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does Post by: SpikeC on March 20, 2014, 05:56:33 PM I don't care who owns Bimota, as long as I can ride one.
Title: Re: Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does Post by: Rudemouthsky on March 20, 2014, 06:48:13 PM I can't imagine a Lamborghini without an image of Dong Johnson and Miami Vice and loud Hawaiian shirts. The Italian Corvette, for Italians with erectile dysfunction :P j/k
Title: Re: Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does Post by: lawbreaker on March 20, 2014, 07:01:38 PM I can't imagine a Lamborghini without an image of Dong Johnson and Miami Vice and loud Hawaiian shirts. The Italian Corvette, for Italians with erectile dysfunction :P j/k That was a testarossa .... unless I'm missing the joke (which happens often) Title: Re: Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does Post by: lawbreaker on March 20, 2014, 07:04:29 PM Aaaaaannnyyyway,
If its made in Italy, by Italians, then it's an Italian bike.... regardless of parent company. If not, then that would mean my Brutale is actually a Harley.... [puke] [puke] Title: Re: Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does Post by: Jonathan on March 20, 2014, 07:08:03 PM I think I own some VW stock through a mutual fund. That means I own Ducati too?
Title: Re: Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does Post by: hbliam on March 20, 2014, 08:26:50 PM People that can afford exotic cars but think people that buy them are douchebags: frugal
People that can't afford exotic cars but think people that buy them are douchebags: jealous Ferrari's, Lambo's, and such are bad ass machines. The sound is as magnificent as our Ducati's. The engineering, handling, and raw power is incredible. I think we see more around where I live then almost anywhere in the world and I never tire of them. Title: Re: Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does Post by: Rudemouthsky on March 21, 2014, 03:00:16 AM People that can afford exotic cars but think people that buy them are douchebags: frugal People that can't afford exotic cars but think people that buy them are douchebags: jealous Ferrari's, Lambo's, and such are bad ass machines. The sound is as magnificent as our Ducati's. The engineering, handling, and raw power is incredible. I think we see more around where I live then almost anywhere in the world and I never tire of them. I bet they are but just really not my thing. I don't really care enough about cars to be jealous of them. Bikes are an entirely different story.... Title: Re: "Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does" Post by: lethe on March 21, 2014, 03:37:33 AM I just want one of everything.
Title: Re: "Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does" Post by: zooom on March 21, 2014, 04:09:41 AM I can't imagine a Lamborghini without an image of Dong Don Johnson and Miami Vice and loud Hawaiian shirts. The Italian Corvette, for Italians with erectile dysfunction :P j/k That was a testarossa .... unless I'm missing the joke (which happens often) actually, 1st it was a Ferrari Daytona Spyder and then later the Testarossa....but I may also be missing the joke too if there was one.... Title: Re: "Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does" Post by: zooom on March 21, 2014, 04:22:12 AM Ferrari's, Lambo's, and such are bad ass machines. The sound is as magnificent as our Ducati's. The engineering, handling, and raw power is incredible. I think we see more around where I live then almost anywhere in the world and I never tire of them. the problem with "most" exotic cars as I see it is this....most of them are WAAAAYYY over engineered for any kind of normal civilian street use and suffer issues from more or less atrophy because of being run in a manner less optimal than what they were origionally designed for....this based mostly on the fact that US streets don't provide legal opportunities to drive them as intended....kinda like the principle idea of the newb on a Hayabusa puttering around on a road while being passed like he is standing still by a guy on a 400cc motard....cars that are built to be used more within the realm of real potential on real roads are much more impressive to me.....hence why I give more respect to a car like Statler's Ferrari Mondial over a guy in a 599 or other cars of that ilk....especially when they are driven and done so regularly.... Title: Re: "Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does" Post by: Rudemouthsky on March 21, 2014, 05:12:48 AM Nope, nobody missed a joke...going off my memory I'd thought there were Lambos with suicide doors in Miami Vice. Was never a fan of that show, I was a kid at the time and didn't watch much teevee, mainly just the A-Team and Dukes of Hazzard, lol
Title: Re: "Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does" Post by: Skybarney on March 21, 2014, 07:38:59 AM If one is really into a fast car for the purity of driving why buy anything besides an Ariel Atom? I can crash five of those for one cheap Ferrari or ten for a decent Lambo.....
Although when money is no object I may buy a really nice Porsche..... Title: Re: "Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does" Post by: hbliam on March 21, 2014, 08:46:42 AM actually, 1st it was a Ferrari Daytona Spyder That was actually a replica built on a corvette chassis but I still thought it was cool. Title: Re: "Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does" Post by: zooom on March 21, 2014, 09:33:00 AM If one is really into a fast car for the purity of driving why buy anything besides an Ariel Atom? I can crash five of those for one cheap Ferrari or ten for a decent Lambo..... the Atom is sweet, but I am also slightly partial to a Caterham Super 7.... Title: Re: "Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does" Post by: Skybarney on March 21, 2014, 09:36:45 AM the Atom is sweet, but I am also slightly partial to a Caterham Super 7.... Also a great and fun toy. Silly as it sounds I am as happy racing a shifter cart as I would be racing a Ferrari. When you get low to the ground everything is fast ( :When it comes to racing I have had a ton of fun on 50cc pocket bikes with my buddies at a go cart track..... Instead of trading paint we traded dye, from our leathers. ;D Title: Re: "Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does" Post by: Dirty Duc on March 24, 2014, 08:35:13 PM I came to Ducati by way of turbocharged RX-7...
My wife bought me one of those "drive a Ferrari on a track" experiences for people DP's age who are scared of motos. After the drive, I told her if I couldn't ride I would have to own a Ferrari, even given the atrocious maintenance (remove the engine and replace the clutch every 10k). Title: Re: "Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does" Post by: Speedbag on March 25, 2014, 12:07:36 PM the problem with "most" exotic cars as I see it is this....most of them are WAAAAYYY over engineered for any kind of normal civilian street use and suffer issues from more or less atrophy because of being run in a manner less optimal than what they were origionally designed for....this based mostly on the fact that US streets don't provide legal opportunities to drive them as intended....kinda like the principle idea of the newb on a Hayabusa puttering around on a road while being passed like he is standing still by a guy on a 400cc motard....cars that are built to be used more within the realm of real potential on real roads are much more impressive to me.....hence why I give more respect to a car like Statler's Ferrari Mondial over a guy in a 599 or other cars of that ilk....especially when they are driven and done so regularly.... This. I parted with my '07 GT500 primarily because after three years I came to the realization that 0-60 is all the fun I could legally have with the car on any regular basis without putting myself in serious jeopardy, plus the thing was a magnet for cops. Luckily I was never caught exercising the beast out in the boonies on a couple occasions. [evil] Throw in winters that last half the year and it just seemed like too much money to have tied up in such an animal. Fun? Hell yes, but on a nice summer day I'd prefer to ride one of the motorbikes. [Dolph] Title: Re: "Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does" Post by: Triple J on March 25, 2014, 02:38:45 PM the problem with "most" exotic cars as I see it is this....most of them are WAAAAYYY over engineered for any kind of normal civilian street use and suffer issues from more or less atrophy because of being run in a manner less optimal than what they were origionally designed for....this based mostly on the fact that US streets don't provide legal opportunities to drive them as intended....kinda like the principle idea of the newb on a Hayabusa puttering around on a road while being passed like he is standing still by a guy on a 400cc motard....cars that are built to be used more within the realm of real potential on real roads are much more impressive to me.....hence why I give more respect to a car like Statler's Ferrari Mondial over a guy in a 599 or other cars of that ilk....especially when they are driven and done so regularly.... That's the problem with any Superbike as well. I took my RSV4 on a ride, and besides being uncomfortable at every single light & slow traffic area, I never needed to get it out of 3rd...even on the freeway! At least the Ferrari/Lambo/whatever has a comfortable seat! ;D Title: Re: "Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does" Post by: Speeddog on March 25, 2014, 03:36:39 PM 1996-2005 Ducati was owned by TPG, a private equity investment firm.
I'd much rather have Ducati owned by an automotive company than a pack of soulless vampire beancounter sharks. Title: Re: "Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does" Post by: DRKWNG on March 25, 2014, 05:27:01 PM the Atom is sweet, but I am also slightly partial to a Caterham Super 7.... Thank you. Make mine a 620R please. http://uk.caterhamcars.com/cars/seven-620-r (http://uk.caterhamcars.com/cars/seven-620-r) (http://i1.ytimg.com/vi/8CRdQA7R9xs/maxresdefault.jpg) Title: Re: "Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does" Post by: Rudemouthsky on March 25, 2014, 05:37:27 PM 1996-2005 Ducati was owned by TPG, a private equity investment firm. I'd much rather have Ducati owned by an automotive company than a pack of soulless vampire beancounter sharks. Certainly can't disagree with that... It would just be nice if Ducati was just Ducati...MV was just MV...BMW was just BMW, etc. That's how brands keep their individuality while being pushed to improve by competition. Those days aren't coming back and it is what it is, but I'm jus' sayin'. Title: Re: "Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does" Post by: hbliam on March 25, 2014, 11:20:06 PM It would just be nice if Ducati was just Ducati...MV was just MV...BMW was just BMW, etc. That's how brands keep their individuality while being pushed to improve by competition. Those days aren't coming back and it is what it is, but I'm jus' sayin'. I agree. Title: Re: "Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does" Post by: Triple J on March 26, 2014, 08:46:25 AM 1996-2005 Ducati was owned by TPG, a private equity investment firm. I'd much rather have Ducati owned by an automotive company than a pack of soulless vampire beancounter sharks. TPG did a lot for Ducati though. I'm pretty sure they are responsible for installing better QC procedures, which was good for all of us. I also know that at least one of the TPG partners was a motorcycle guy, and a fan of Ducati...owning several. That said, it would be nice if Ducati was just owned by Ducati. I don't think a car company is automatically any better than a private equity firm...seems the motorcycles could always just be viewed as the red-headed stepchild. Title: Re: Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does Post by: duccarlos on March 26, 2014, 10:45:10 AM I think we see more around where I live then almost anywhere in the world and I never tire of them. If you lived in Dubai, you might be driving one for work. Title: Re: "Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does" Post by: 1.21GW on March 27, 2014, 11:28:20 AM 1996-2005 Ducati was owned by TPG, a private equity investment firm. I'd much rather have Ducati owned by an automotive company than a pack of soulless vampire beancounter sharks. Grass is greener, as far as I'm concerned. As a former Saab owner, I can say that having your favorite cult brand run by a massive international automotive conglomerate ain't so fun either. In less than a decade of ownership, GM killed an iconic 60 yr-old brand. Besides, I'm no Duc historian, but I thought the TPG years were prosperous compared to the dreadful eighties. Lot of good bikes from '96-'05. Title: Re: Audi does not own Ducati; Lamborghini does Post by: abby normal on March 28, 2014, 06:21:08 AM That was a testarossa .... unless I'm missing the joke (which happens often) in the first year or so it was a white daytona (replica). the characters crashed that one and miami PD somehow got hold of a testarossa (replica). |