Main Menu

why not the 750?

Started by Privateer, February 14, 2010, 05:37:06 AM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages 1 2 3
User actions

ducpainter

#30
February 17, 2010, 04:49:27 PM
Quote from: ato memphis on February 17, 2010, 04:58:23 AM
Perhaps friend was a bit of a weenie?

The newer fuelies, like the 695, have excellent fuelings and such so that has made a big difference. The 696's power is gobs more than the close-in-displacement 600, 620, etc.
I doubt it.

I had a fuelie 750 SS.

It was a dog. ;D
"Once you accept that a child on the autistic spectrum experiences the world in
 a completely different way than you, you will be open to understand how that
 perspective
    is even more amazing than yours."
    To realize the value of nine  months:
    Ask a mother who gave birth to a stillborn.
"Don't piss off old people The older we get, the less 'Life in Prison' is a deterrent."


junior varsity

#31
February 17, 2010, 05:06:17 PM
well, all i know is the new-fangled robot lookin' 696 has got some zip.

i'd be interested to see the wheel-weights on the newer dss monsters compared to the older monsters - not sure if they were the same.

That would make a good bit of difference in feel.

caperix

#32
February 18, 2010, 11:56:41 AM
The 750 is a good motor, I always felt like ducati set it up for smooth power delivery.  The low compression ratio, small valve heads, and mild cams do make it a smooth motor with very even torque.  620's do make about the same horse power, but they have higher compression and more agressive cams in almost the same head as the 750.
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2 3
User actions