Ducati Monster Forum

powered by:

February 05, 2025, 12:49:59 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to the DMF
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  



Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 14t front sprocket  (Read 11457 times)
ungeheuer
ɹǝʌO d∩ uıɐןɐɹʇsn∀
Local Moderator
Post Whore
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 20826


Often wrong. Never in doubt.


WWW
« Reply #15 on: April 02, 2009, 08:01:41 PM »

So why would Ducati sell 2 different front sprockets?...a solid front sprocket, and one with 8 or so ~3/8 inch holes drilled all around the sprocket?  Im not saying it makes a huge difference, but they do sell two 14t front sprockets and they do label one of them lightweight.

Truth and Marketing..... 
It's true: The sprocket with the holes really is gonna be lighter than the solid steel one. 
Its marketing: You could save the same amount of weight by carring 98 cents less change in your pocket each time you ride. 
Logged

Ducati 1100S Monster Ducati 1260ST Multistrada + Moto Guzzi Griso 1200SE


Previously: Ducati1200SMultistradaDucatiMonster696DucatiSD900MotoMorini31/2
Raux
Guest
« Reply #16 on: April 03, 2009, 12:11:19 AM »

but that's rotational weight. any mathmeticians want  to take a stab at what are the benefits of a lighter sprocket?
Logged
DucatiTorrey
My wife's super hero is my
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1748


Industrial Designer


WWW
« Reply #17 on: April 03, 2009, 02:08:04 AM »

then clean the dirt of your tires.
Logged

  - real place
Darth Paul
New Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 40


« Reply #18 on: April 03, 2009, 06:42:01 AM »

I went to a 14T sprocket on an S2R800 and took it off about 2 weeks later.  Sure it made coming off from a stop smoother, but when I was up riding twisties in the Santa Cruz mountains I found my self having to shift before and after just about every turn.  15T gives me a range wide enough to do just about everything in 3rd / 2nd gear, instead of having to go all the way up to 5th sometimes with the 14T.

I now run 15 front 42 rear and I'm really happy with that configuration.  I also have an AFAM 14T sprocket with only a few hundred miles on it for sale if anyone wants one cheap Smiley
Logged
tcspeedfreak
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 202



« Reply #19 on: April 03, 2009, 04:10:19 PM »

gotta pull the bike out of storage and check the chain and sprockets before i really do anything along with all the other preseason stuff, before i get to creative with the mods
Logged

just another fool playing with boats and bikes
CraigD426
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 91


If you can't be good, be good at it.


« Reply #20 on: April 05, 2009, 03:33:46 PM »

Ok, so I have about 8500 miles on the bike, original chain and sprockets. Is it a bad idea to put a new 14T sprocket on without changing anything else?
Logged

2003 M1000Sie, Carbon fiber Akrapovic high mount full system exhaust, Speedymoto frame sliders, Power Commander, open airbox, Dyno'd and runs like a bat outta hell!

http://s193.photobucket.com/albums/z55/craigd426/
LA
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1317

The Sleek Black Beauty


« Reply #21 on: April 05, 2009, 05:33:27 PM »

but that's rotational weight. any mathmeticians want  to take a stab at what are the benefits of a lighter sprocket?

Rotating mass does make a difference.  In the right circumstance, a big difference.  It's a physics thing - moment of inertia or something like that. In this case the dia. of the front sprocket is so small relative to say the rear sprocket, the difference rate of acceleration of the rotating assemble due to the weight front sprocket is immeasurably small.  And when you are taking weight off a rotating wheel, whether it's an internal engine part or a rear wheel and tire of the bike, taking off the weight at a point closest to the outside diameter of the wheel make the most difference.

If you were talking about unsprung weight and control by the suspension, it doesn't matter where the weight comes off - just total weight.

The moment of inertia of an object about a given axis describes how difficult it is to change its angular motion about that axis. For example, consider two discs, A and B, made of the same material and of equal mass. Disc A has a larger radius than B (therefore is thinner). Disc B is thicker and smaller in diameter. It requires more effort to accelerate disc A (change its angular velocity) because its mass is distributed farther from its axis of rotation: mass that is farther out from that axis must, for a given angular velocity, move more quickly than mass closer in. In this case, disc A has a larger moment of inertia than disc B.

LA Grin
Logged

"I'm leaving this one totally stock" - Full Termi kit, Ohlins damper, Pazzo levers, lane splitters, 520 quick change 14/43 gears, DP gold press plate w/open cover, Ductile iron rotors w/cp211 pads.

R90S (hot rod), 80-900SS, Norton 850 MkIII, S4RS
DucatiTorrey
My wife's super hero is my
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1748


Industrial Designer


WWW
« Reply #22 on: April 05, 2009, 05:55:10 PM »

Quote
In this case the dia. of the front sprocket is so small relative to say the rear sprocket, the difference rate of acceleration of the rotating assemble due to the weight front sprocket is immeasurably small.

thank you
Logged

  - real place
killerniceguy
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 183



« Reply #23 on: April 05, 2009, 06:04:15 PM »


I went for a ride today (first of the season, still snow around here Cry) with my newly installed 14t sprocket. What an incredible difference.  I had thought about installing one last season but put it off for whatever reason.  I should have listened and done it the second I got the bike.  It makes the bike much more rideable.  Totally recommended.

Logged

S2R800 race bike.  www.ducaticup.com
DucatiTorrey
My wife's super hero is my
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1748


Industrial Designer


WWW
« Reply #24 on: April 05, 2009, 06:33:35 PM »

is thsi something i can do on my own at home? what kind of tools? there is a tutorial right? ill do a search.


Logged

  - real place
hillbillypolack
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 470


« Reply #25 on: April 06, 2009, 06:52:11 PM »

You can do it at home, but have a torque wrench and a friend when you're ready to re-install the sprocket. 

You will want your friend to hold the rear brake when you're torquing the sprocket nut, and it's pretty easy.  Do a search for the correct torque.  Stripping out the countershaft would not be a cheap or easy fix.

Don't know where you guys get your sprockets, but mine was $23 at the local Ducati shop.  $53 as mentioned earlier is just flat out price gouging.

Back to the physics stuff.  Someone had posted here that a 15T front is optimal for chainrun clearances, and better leverage at the shaft.  You would of course then need to increase the rear sprocket (and or carrier) to obtain your lower final drive.  I'm looking at a 15T front, and either a 43 or 44T rear.  Either way, it's better accellerating than the tall stock.
Logged
Paegelow
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 192


« Reply #26 on: April 06, 2009, 07:53:00 PM »

If you were talking about unsprung weight and control by the suspension, it doesn't matter where the weight comes off - just total weight.

It does make a difference, at least on the rear suspension.  Since a swingarm is a big lever, weight reduction in parts way out at the end (wheel, axle, sprocket, brake caliper/rotor, etc.) will have a much greater effect than weight reduction near the swingarm pivot (fender, shock, and so on)!

 chug
Logged
LA
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1317

The Sleek Black Beauty


« Reply #27 on: April 07, 2009, 08:20:30 AM »

It does make a difference, at least on the rear suspension.  Since a swingarm is a big lever, weight reduction in parts way out at the end (wheel, axle, sprocket, brake caliper/rotor, etc.) will have a much greater effect than weight reduction near the swingarm pivot (fender, shock, and so on)! chug

I didn't mean it makes no difference where the weight comes off the swing arm assembly. I meant so far as the suspension controlling the total unsprung weight that it has to manage it doesn't matter if the weight comes off at the axcle/center of the sprocket or wheel, just the total weight taken off. The moment of inertia thing concerns rotational weight in this case.

I agree, taking weight off at the end of the swing arm at the outside radius certainly makes a bigger difference than takeing weight off at the swing arm pivot.  We are in agreement on that.

LA
Logged

"I'm leaving this one totally stock" - Full Termi kit, Ohlins damper, Pazzo levers, lane splitters, 520 quick change 14/43 gears, DP gold press plate w/open cover, Ductile iron rotors w/cp211 pads.

R90S (hot rod), 80-900SS, Norton 850 MkIII, S4RS
duccarlos
Local Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7994



WWW
« Reply #28 on: April 07, 2009, 08:33:58 AM »

Don't know where you guys get your sprockets, but mine was $23 at the local Ducati shop.  $53 as mentioned earlier is just flat out price gouging.

+1
Logged

my keyboard just served me with paternity suit.
ungeheuer
ɹǝʌO d∩ uıɐןɐɹʇsn∀
Local Moderator
Post Whore
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 20826


Often wrong. Never in doubt.


WWW
« Reply #29 on: April 08, 2009, 05:33:12 AM »

Don't know where you guys get your sprockets, but mine was $23 at the local Ducati shop.  $53 as mentioned earlier is just flat out price gouging.

+1 too
Logged

Ducati 1100S Monster Ducati 1260ST Multistrada + Moto Guzzi Griso 1200SE


Previously: Ducati1200SMultistradaDucatiMonster696DucatiSD900MotoMorini31/2
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.1.1