Ducati Monster Forum

powered by:

February 24, 2025, 11:15:01 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Tapatalk users...click me
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  



Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 1100S Quick Review  (Read 3561 times)
duccarlos
Local Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7994



WWW
« on: April 20, 2009, 10:24:44 AM »

Got a chance to demo ride the 1100S on Saturday. My quick $0.02? Me no likey. I'm not going to trash it for the looks like all the other "purists" have. I consider it a natural evolution. Anyway, pros were mainly around the power and the Ohlins (no surpise there). Kept up pretty easily with the 848s that were leading the pack. Not many twisties in Florida, but it was planted on the few turns that the short ride had to offer.

Cons: ERGOS!! Now I understand the complaints about your manhood being less than comfortable. Where I would generally recommend new exhaust and tail chop for the old Monster, you have to and I mean HAVE TO change that seat. The angle is so agressive that my buddy's hands were numb. I expecting this from the 848, not the Monster. My other complaint might just be the specific bike I rode. You had to let out the clutch way far before it engaged the power. On those corners that I went into took me a while to power out of. Once the power engaged it took off, but that was a painful wait.

All in all, I don't think I would replace my old Monster with the new one unless they fix these issues. If I have to drop some extra cash just so that I can be just mildly comfortable, then forget it.
Logged

my keyboard just served me with paternity suit.
Spidey
Crashin' mofo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4842



« Reply #1 on: April 20, 2009, 10:44:56 AM »

My other complaint might just be the specific bike I rode. You had to let out the clutch way far before it engaged the power. On those corners that I went into took me a while to power out of. Once the power engaged it took off, but that was a painful wait.

I really disliked the clutch on the 1100 at first for exactly the same reason.  It's got a really late pick up.  After a few days riding, I figured it out and then ended up liking it a lot.  It was pretty easy to drag it with a single finger when riding hard, which I appreciated.  I found it easier to modulate the wheel hop that can accompany agressive downshifts.  It just took a coupla days to get used to.  I totally agree abou that seat.  It done gone broke my fun bits.   Cry
Logged

Occasionally AFM #702  My stuff:  The M1000SS, a mashed r6, Vino 125, the Blonde, some rugrats, yuppie cage, child molester van, bourbon.
duccarlos
Local Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7994



WWW
« Reply #2 on: April 20, 2009, 10:54:10 AM »

I always laughed when other kept talking about getting crushed. It wasn't funny when I was on there. I ride up to see the guys of the CDC and that means 250 miles of boring highway riding. I could not imagine 3 to 4 hours of that.
Logged

my keyboard just served me with paternity suit.
geoffduc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 894


18 till i die


« Reply #3 on: April 20, 2009, 12:10:37 PM »

Hey Carlos what's all this about crushed nut's  Embarrassed

When i rode the demo bike over the xmas holiday's i had no problem with the clutch and the shop had changed the seat so me no crushy nutties  laughingdp

How's the "T"  Huh?

 coffee
Logged

2015 scrambler FT
2009 monster 1100s
duccarlos
Local Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7994



WWW
« Reply #4 on: April 20, 2009, 12:36:15 PM »

My nutties were definitely hurting.
Logged

my keyboard just served me with paternity suit.
IdZer0
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 444


BE


« Reply #5 on: April 20, 2009, 12:47:53 PM »

Last week I did a short demo ride and the nut crushing is definitely something you immediately notice.  I mentioned it to the dealer and he said, well you can solve it with the touring seat because it's higher. I guess Ducati found a new must-do mod besides the exhaust they can sell to you as an option Roll Eyes.

The clutch late engagement is exactly like the one on my 695 so I don't know any better (or worse?). On my bike it's a bit annoying as they're non adjustable, but on the 1100 that's not an issue. I thought the late engagement was due to the slipper function of the 695, but as the 1100 has it too I wonder about what makes it this way (and why they chose to do it)

I found the ergonomics better then my bike. I've been comparing ergo's of my bike with both the S*R and 1100 but can't find what it is that makes it SO different. Both the 1100 and my buddy's S4R are a walk in the park compared to my bike (causing me pain in the hip and knee when riding 2+ hours). If the 1100S wasn't that overpriced I seriously would have bought one last week!

Logged

2007 Monster 695, DP ECU, Low mount Alu Termignonis
replaced by 2011 848 EVO
duccarlos
Local Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7994



WWW
« Reply #6 on: April 20, 2009, 01:08:40 PM »

I believe the only difference is the seat between the S4R and the 695.
Logged

my keyboard just served me with paternity suit.
geoffduc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 894


18 till i die


« Reply #7 on: April 20, 2009, 01:46:13 PM »

I believe the only difference is the seat between the S4R and the 695.

Carlos you are so right. bow down

On the 695 the seat was lower.  waytogo I think it was to encourage shorter riders onto monsters.  Wink Wink

 coffee
Logged

2015 scrambler FT
2009 monster 1100s
duccarlos
Local Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7994



WWW
« Reply #8 on: April 20, 2009, 01:49:18 PM »

There might be some thing else, like risers or something, but I can't think of anything.
Logged

my keyboard just served me with paternity suit.
Spidey
Crashin' mofo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4842



« Reply #9 on: April 20, 2009, 01:56:57 PM »

I found the ergonomics better then my bike. I've been comparing ergo's of my bike with both the S*R and 1100 but can't find what it is that makes it SO different. Both the 1100 and my buddy's S4R are a walk in the park compared to my bike (causing me pain in the hip and knee when riding 2+ hours). If the 1100S wasn't that overpriced I seriously would have bought one last week!

In addition to the seat, aren't the footpegs in the s*r and the 695 in different positions?  They're different.  Also, aren't the bars different as well?  Both of those will make a big difference.

As for the 1100 ergos, I've said my piece about 'em previously:  awesome for hard riding, ouchie on the meat rocket for loping around.  http://ducatimonsterforum.org/index.php?topic=13509.0
Logged

Occasionally AFM #702  My stuff:  The M1000SS, a mashed r6, Vino 125, the Blonde, some rugrats, yuppie cage, child molester van, bourbon.
duccarlos
Local Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7994



WWW
« Reply #10 on: April 20, 2009, 02:07:38 PM »

Yep, pretty much what I thought, except for the suspension. Ohlins are good on the street, but I can just imagine how good they would be on the track. I wish Ducati would being the 1100S to the track like they do for the HM. Something I did forget to mention was the you have a better view over the front due to the lack of huge cluster. That's definitely a pro.
Logged

my keyboard just served me with paternity suit.
IdZer0
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 444


BE


« Reply #11 on: April 21, 2009, 12:32:15 AM »

In addition to the seat, aren't the footpegs in the s*r and the 695 in different positions?  They're different.  Also, aren't the bars different as well?  Both of those will make a big difference.

Seat hight doesn't feel different to me whatever people say about it. I've compared both my OEM seat, with the DP Gel seat and the seat on an S*R, they all feel the same to me.

The footpegs are more out to the side on DSS bikes and that is the one thing I can surely say is bad for (my) ergonomics. On top of that the Sidi boots I wear, are wide at the ankels  which put my ankels more out than the toes.

The weird thing is because the 695 is more  focused on beginners & short people (bike sits lower & bars have more sweep,...) I would have thought it would be easier for me (being 5'7"  with 30" inseam) than the S*R, but it isn't. The 1100 is totally different, so I was expecting an improvement there ,but actually it felt a lot like the S*R to me.
On my bike I absolutely need to lean forward to have a good front-rear weight balance and keep my arms loose, on the S*R and 1100 I could sit up more straight and the bars where easier to reach.

Maybe the short rides weren't long enough to give a correct impression on the 1100 and S*R.
Logged

2007 Monster 695, DP ECU, Low mount Alu Termignonis
replaced by 2011 848 EVO
sfarchie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 542



« Reply #12 on: April 21, 2009, 05:04:39 AM »

It's interesting you thought the clutch was such a reach. I had a 696 and I had the hardest time with that until I changed to CRG adjustable levers. With my 1100S, I find it catching almost at the point of release. Even my buddy who bought my 696 liked the clutch on the 1100 better. My biggest gripe is I can't get into neutral as easily as the 696. Maybe still need some more breaking in. At 2300 miles it did loosen up a bit, but more would be nice.

As for the ergo, I swapped out the seat immediately to the DP touring seat. Did a 360 mile one day ride on it and I think I'm still fertile.
Logged

Ray
SFaRChie
'10 Streetfighter, '01 KTM Duke II, '09 M1100S (RIP), '08 Vespa GTS 250,'58 Vespa Allstate (RIP), M696 (sold)
dne1810
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 60


« Reply #13 on: April 21, 2009, 08:26:49 AM »

It's interesting you thought the clutch was such a reach. I had a 696 and I had the hardest time with that until I changed to CRG adjustable levers. With my 1100S, I find it catching almost at the point of release. Even my buddy who bought my 696 liked the clutch on the 1100 better. My biggest gripe is I can't get into neutral as easily as the 696. Maybe still need some more breaking in. At 2300 miles it did loosen up a bit, but more would be nice.

As for the ergo, I swapped out the seat immediately to the DP touring seat. Did a 360 mile one day ride on it and I think I'm still fertile.

you might want to check that N thing with your dealer.. have my 1100S since February, broke just over 1000 miles and from day 1 never had issue with N.
Logged
ungeheuer
ɹǝʌO d∩ uıɐןɐɹʇsn∀
Local Moderator
Post Whore
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 20831


Often wrong. Never in doubt.


WWW
« Reply #14 on: September 16, 2009, 03:31:42 PM »

.....My biggest gripe is I can't get into neutral as easily as the 696. Maybe still need some more breaking in. At 2300 miles it did loosen up a bit, but more would be nice.
Interesting.  I'm finding exactly the same thing.  On my 696 I could pop it into neutral first time every time but on my 1100S I have to sit there like an idiot flicking up and down between 1st and 2nd hunting for neutral.  Very annoying.  Did yours resolve itself?  Was it just a getting used to thing?  Or did you have it sorted at your dealer?  Mine has only done 500kms so far....  and its possible I have created/magnified the issue coz I have fitted Pazzo levers and Rizoma rear-sets... um?
Logged

Ducati 1100S Monster Ducati 1260ST Multistrada + Moto Guzzi Griso 1200SE


Previously: Ducati1200SMultistradaDucatiMonster696DucatiSD900MotoMorini31/2
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.1.1