Ducati Monster Forum

powered by:

April 16, 2024, 01:11:16 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to the DMF
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  



Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: When two cylinders just aren't enough  (Read 2581 times)
alexisonfire
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 425


« on: June 18, 2009, 09:09:22 AM »

There's this.

http://jalopnik.com/5294379/48+cylinder-kawasaki-pushes-boundaries-of-sanity
Logged

You can live to 100 if you give up all the things that make you want to live to 100.

07 S2R 1000
webspoke
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 861



« Reply #1 on: June 18, 2009, 11:03:25 AM »

If it used 848/1098 sparkplugs, plug changes would run over $1900 ($40x48)
Being conservative, I like this X4 idea.  Much simpler math.


More images http://www.asphaltandrubber.com/nggallery/page-2319/album-3/gallery-44/
Logged

Streetfighter 1098S
RED
carries my
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2894


'04 ST4s, '73 Triumph Bonneville 750 cafe


« Reply #2 on: June 18, 2009, 01:00:43 PM »

Didn't Ariel bikes in the early part of last millineum have an opposed 4 cyl layout like this but horizontally not vertically?
Logged
rickmillertx
Ride while you can!
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 123



« Reply #3 on: June 18, 2009, 05:29:04 PM »

I would think after creating something like that you would look in the mirror and say, "Boy, what a waste of time and money!"
I could have created a gas turbine riding mower instead.
 bang head
Logged
muskrat
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8335



« Reply #4 on: June 18, 2009, 06:23:32 PM »

I would think after creating something like that you would look in the mirror and say, "Boy, what a waste of time and money!"
I could have created a gas turbine riding mower instead.
 bang head


 Smiley
Logged

Can we thin the gene pool? 

2015 MTS 1200
09 Electra Glide
GeorgeInDallas
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 384



« Reply #5 on: June 19, 2009, 07:15:29 AM »

I would think after creating something like that you would look in the mirror and say, "Boy, what a waste of time and money!"
I could have created a gas turbine riding mower instead.
 bang head


I agree.  And where are the panniers?  The wind screen?  The passenger seat?  What a goofball.

G.
Logged

"It's about the ride.", Peter Fonda in Wild Hogs.
GeorgeInDallas
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 384



« Reply #6 on: June 19, 2009, 07:17:16 AM »

AND... I'm pretty sure this was PhotoShopped.   coffee

G.
Logged

"It's about the ride.", Peter Fonda in Wild Hogs.
Slag
Guest
« Reply #7 on: June 19, 2009, 07:43:42 AM »

AND... I'm pretty sure this was PhotoShopped.   coffee

G.



Kawasaki 48 Cylinder Runs!
Logged
Slag
Guest
« Reply #8 on: June 19, 2009, 07:50:18 AM »

1900's - That is the devil's work
1950's - goddamn Communists!
2009 - Must be photoshopped  laughingdp
Logged
Pinocchio
Unsung
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 779



« Reply #9 on: June 20, 2009, 02:36:44 PM »

More two-stroke multi madness from 2004, this time multi-engined:

Notice that the rider can reach the bars from the seat. Photoshopped or not, you can't say the same for the 48-cylinder Kawasaki.

More pics of "The Dolmette" 24-engined (yes, "24-engined", not merely a 24-cylinder engine) from wyldsyd:
http://www.wyldsyd.com/dolmette.htm

The tech from the Dolmar Website:
http://www.dolmar.com/news/dolmette/technical_facts.html


The bike nearly beat a professionally-driven Audi AS400, with only 20 of its 24 engines running, in a drag race at Lausitz. Unfortunately, it suffered from excessive wheel spin off the line:
http://www.dolmar.com/news/dolmette/the_race.html

Since the Dolmette lacked an ECU, traction control was definitely out of the question. So was electric starting, obviously. I haven't found out why it had a gas tank when each of the chain saw engines had its own fuel supply. Still, could this be the Spruce Goose of motorcycles?

Then, of course, there is this thing:
« Last Edit: June 20, 2009, 04:39:05 PM by bevelhead » Logged

1969 Scrambler (450 “Jupiter”), 2005 MTS 1000DS, 2007 Monster S4RS, 2010 MTS 1200S Touring, 2018 Monster 1200R, 2021 Monster 937+
RED
carries my
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2894


'04 ST4s, '73 Triumph Bonneville 750 cafe


« Reply #10 on: June 23, 2009, 08:47:57 AM »

More two-stroke multi madness from 2004, this time multi-engined:


All it needs is a propeller!

Then, of course, there is this thing:

Logged
Pinocchio
Unsung
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 779



« Reply #11 on: June 23, 2009, 02:32:37 PM »

Propellor? OK, I'll give you propellor!
« Last Edit: June 23, 2009, 02:35:26 PM by bevelhead » Logged

1969 Scrambler (450 “Jupiter”), 2005 MTS 1000DS, 2007 Monster S4RS, 2010 MTS 1200S Touring, 2018 Monster 1200R, 2021 Monster 937+
GeorgeInDallas
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 384



« Reply #12 on: June 23, 2009, 05:52:38 PM »

More two-stroke multi madness from 2004, this time multi-engined:


http://www.wyldsyd.com/dolmette.htm

The tech from the Dolmar Website:
http://www.dolmar.com/news/dolmette/technical_facts.html


Since the Dolmette lacked an ECU, traction control was definitely out of the question. So was electric starting, obviously. I haven't found out why it had a gas tank when each of the chain saw engines had its own fuel supply. Still, could this be the Spruce Goose of motorcycles?


That's not the gas tank, it's the drag chute container... Tongue
Logged

"It's about the ride.", Peter Fonda in Wild Hogs.
RED
carries my
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2894


'04 ST4s, '73 Triumph Bonneville 750 cafe


« Reply #13 on: June 23, 2009, 06:01:13 PM »

Propellor? OK, I'll give you propellor!


Would this be classified a Superbike?
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.1.1